Loss of Permanent Resident Status (18:VIII) - Revision history

LSLAP at 19:35, 13 October 2025

2025-10-13T19:35:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 13 October 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= August ~~5, 2024~~}}		{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= 14 August 2025}}
	{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}		{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}

LSLAP: /* B. Inadmissibility */

2025-09-29T15:08:48Z

B. Inadmissibility

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 29 September 2025
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded from refugee protection in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.		:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded from refugee protection in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.

	:'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 ''Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)'', 2017 SCC 50]). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[Immigration_Issues_at_Sentencing_(18:XIII)\|Section XIII: Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].		:'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)]'', 2017 SCC 50). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[Immigration_Issues_at_Sentencing_(18:XIII)\|Section XIII: Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].


	{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-23}}		{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-23}}

LSLAP at 17:31, 7 August 2024

2024-08-07T17:31:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 7 August 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= ~~July 18~~, ~~2023~~}}		{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= August 5, 2024}}
	{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}		{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}

LSLAP: /* B. Inadmissibility */

2024-08-06T02:56:08Z

B. Inadmissibility

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 6 August 2024
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Inadmissibility means that a foreign national or permanent resident has contravened the IRPA in some way and may be issued a removal order.		Inadmissibility means that a foreign national or permanent resident has contravened the IRPA in some way and may be issued a removal order.

	There are three types of removal orders, which are discussed in [[~~Section_X~~ \| Section X of this chapter]].		There are three types of removal orders, which are discussed in [[Immigration_Removal_Orders_(18:X)\|Section X of this chapter]].

	If a permanent resident is deemed inadmissible, they may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).		If a permanent resident is deemed inadmissible, they may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).

LSLAP at 02:53, 6 August 2024

2024-08-06T02:53:34Z

Clicklaw Editor at 19:58, 5 September 2023

2023-09-05T19:58:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 5 September 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= ~~August 23~~, 2023}}		{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= July 18, 2023}}
	{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}		{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}

Line 13:		Line 13:

	A foreign national or permanent resident can be determined “inadmissible” to Canada for several reasons, including, but not limited to:		A foreign national or permanent resident can be determined “inadmissible” to Canada for several reasons, including, but not limited to:

	*Committing a serious crime;		*Committing a serious crime;
	*Being found to have misrepresented information in their immigration application;.		*Being found to have misrepresented information in their immigration application;
	*Medical reasons that endanger public health and safety;		*Medical reasons that endanger public health and safety;
	*If you are unable or unwilling to support yourself and your family members.		*If you are unable or unwilling to support yourself and your family members.
Line 29:		Line 30:


	{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-22}}		{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-23}}

LSLAP at 07:27, 23 August 2023

2023-08-23T07:27:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:27, 23 August 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= ~~July 29~~, ~~2022~~}}		{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= August 23, 2023}}
	{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}		{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}

Line 6:		Line 6:
	== A. Residency Requirement ==		== A. Residency Requirement ==

	A permanent resident must meet the residency requirements as outlined in the IRPA. '''Generally, a permanent resident must be physically present in Canada for 730 days out of every five years.''' If a person has been a permanent resident for less than five years, they must demonstrate at examination, that they will be able to meet the residency obligation in respect of the five-year period immediately after they became a permanent resident. The residency requirements can be met in a few different ways. See s. 28 of the IRPA for full details.		A permanent resident must meet the residency requirements as outlined in the IRPA. '''Generally, a permanent resident must be physically present in Canada for 730 days out of every five years.''' If a person has been a permanent resident for less than five years, they must demonstrate at examination, that they will be able to meet the residency obligation in respect of the five-year period immediately after they became a permanent resident. The residency requirements can be met in a few different ways. See s. 28 of the ''IRPA'' for full details.

	:'''NOTE:''' The onus is on the permanent resident to demonstrate with supporting documentation as considered necessary by an officer that they were physically present in Canada for the required number of days or have otherwise met (or will be able to meet) the residency obligation as prescribed in IRPA. The permanent resident also bears the onus of presenting documentation that is credible, in the opinion of an officer, to support any assertion(s) made by the permanent resident, or that may have been made on behalf of that permanent resident.		:'''NOTE:''' The onus is on the permanent resident to demonstrate with supporting documentation as considered necessary by an officer that they were physically present in Canada for the required number of days or have otherwise met (or will be able to meet) the residency obligation as prescribed in ''IRPA''. The permanent resident also bears the onus of presenting documentation that is credible, in the opinion of an officer, to support any assertion(s) made by the permanent resident, or that may have been made on behalf of that permanent resident.

	== B. Inadmissibility ==		== B. Inadmissibility ==

	A foreign national or permanent resident can be determined “inadmissible” to Canada for several reasons, including, but not limited to~~, committing~~ a serious crime ~~or being~~ found to have misrepresented information in their immigration application. Inadmissibility means that a foreign national or permanent resident has contravened the IRPA in some way, and ~~will~~ be issued a removal order.		A foreign national or permanent resident can be determined “inadmissible” to Canada for several reasons, including, but not limited to:
			*Committing a serious crime;
			*Being found to have misrepresented information in their immigration application;.
			*Medical reasons that endanger public health and safety;
			*If you are unable or unwilling to support yourself and your family members.

			Inadmissibility means that a foreign national or permanent resident has contravened the IRPA in some way and may be issued a removal order.

	There are three types of removal orders, which are discussed below.		There are three types of removal orders, which are discussed below.

	If a permanent resident is ~~determined~~ inadmissible, they may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).		If a permanent resident is deemed inadmissible, they may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).

	:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.		:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded from refugee protection in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.

	:'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50]). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[Immigration_Issues_at_Sentencing_(18:XIII)\|XIII: Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].		:'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50]). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[Immigration_Issues_at_Sentencing_(18:XIII)\|XIII: Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].

Clicklaw Editor: /* B. Inadmissibility */

2022-10-15T02:23:10Z

B. Inadmissibility

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:23, 15 October 2022
Line 16:		Line 16:
	There are three types of removal orders, which are discussed below.		There are three types of removal orders, which are discussed below.

	If a permanent resident is determined inadmissible, ~~he or she~~ may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).		If a permanent resident is determined inadmissible, they may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).

	:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.		:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.

Clicklaw Editor: /* B. Inadmissibility */

2022-10-15T02:20:31Z

B. Inadmissibility

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 15 October 2022
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.		:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.

	:'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50]). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[~~Immigration Issues at Sentencing~~ (18:XI) \| XIII Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].		:'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50]). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[Immigration_Issues_at_Sentencing_(18:XIII)\|XIII: Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].


	{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-22}}		{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-22}}

Clicklaw Editor at 23:24, 14 October 2022

2022-10-14T23:24:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 14 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= July 4, 2022}}		{{REVIEWED LSLAP \| date= July 29, 2022}}
	{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}		{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}

Line 8:		Line 8:
	A permanent resident must meet the residency requirements as outlined in the IRPA. '''Generally, a permanent resident must be physically present in Canada for 730 days out of every five years.''' If a person has been a permanent resident for less than five years, they must demonstrate at examination, that they will be able to meet the residency obligation in respect of the five-year period immediately after they became a permanent resident. The residency requirements can be met in a few different ways. See s. 28 of the IRPA for full details.		A permanent resident must meet the residency requirements as outlined in the IRPA. '''Generally, a permanent resident must be physically present in Canada for 730 days out of every five years.''' If a person has been a permanent resident for less than five years, they must demonstrate at examination, that they will be able to meet the residency obligation in respect of the five-year period immediately after they became a permanent resident. The residency requirements can be met in a few different ways. See s. 28 of the IRPA for full details.

	'''NOTE:''' The onus is on the permanent resident to demonstrate with supporting documentation as considered necessary by an officer that they were physically present in Canada for the required number of days or have otherwise met (or will be able to meet) the residency obligation as prescribed in IRPA. The permanent resident also bears the onus of presenting documentation that is credible, in the opinion of an officer, to support any assertion(s) made by the permanent resident, or that may have been made on behalf of that permanent resident.		:'''NOTE:''' The onus is on the permanent resident to demonstrate with supporting documentation as considered necessary by an officer that they were physically present in Canada for the required number of days or have otherwise met (or will be able to meet) the residency obligation as prescribed in IRPA. The permanent resident also bears the onus of presenting documentation that is credible, in the opinion of an officer, to support any assertion(s) made by the permanent resident, or that may have been made on behalf of that permanent resident.

	== B. Inadmissibility ==		== B. Inadmissibility ==
Line 18:		Line 18:
	If a permanent resident is determined inadmissible, he or she may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).		If a permanent resident is determined inadmissible, he or she may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).

	'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.		:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.

			:'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50]). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[Immigration Issues at Sentencing (18:XI) \| XIII Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].

	'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50]). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[Immigration Issues at Sentencing (18:XI) \| XIII Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].

	{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-22}}		{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-22}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 6 August 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}		{{LSLAP Manual TOC\|expanded = immigration}}

	It is possible for a permanent resident to lose their permanent resident status and ~~can~~ even be removed from Canada in certain circumstances. ~~Further, a~~ permanent resident may also voluntarily relinquish their status as a permanent resident.		It is possible for a permanent resident to lose their permanent resident status and to even be removed from Canada in certain circumstances. A permanent resident may also voluntarily relinquish their status as a permanent resident.

	== A. Residency Requirement ==		== A. Residency Requirement ==

	A permanent resident must meet the residency requirements as outlined in the IRPA. '''Generally, a permanent resident must be physically present in Canada for 730 days out of every five years.''' If a person has been a permanent resident for less than five years, they must demonstrate at examination, that they will be able to meet the residency obligation in respect of the five-year period immediately after they became a permanent resident. The residency requirements can be met in a few different ways. See s. 28 of the ''IRPA'' for full details.		A permanent resident must meet the residency requirements as outlined in the ''IRPA''. '''Generally, a permanent resident must be physically present in Canada for 730 days out of every five years.''' If a person has been a permanent resident for less than five years, they must demonstrate at examination, that they will be able to meet the residency obligation in respect of the five-year period immediately after they became a permanent resident. The residency requirements can be met in a few different ways. See s 28 of the ''IRPA'' for full details.

	:'''NOTE:''' The onus is on the permanent resident to demonstrate with supporting documentation as considered necessary by an officer that they were physically present in Canada for the required number of days or have otherwise met (or will be able to meet) the residency obligation as prescribed in ''IRPA''. The permanent resident also bears the onus of presenting documentation that is credible, in the opinion of an officer, to support any assertion(s) made by the permanent resident, or that may have been made on behalf of that permanent resident.		:'''NOTE:''' The onus is on the permanent resident to demonstrate with supporting documentation as considered necessary by an officer that they were physically present in Canada for the required number of days or have otherwise met (or will be able to meet) the residency obligation as prescribed in ''IRPA''. The permanent resident also bears the onus of presenting documentation that is credible, in the opinion of an officer, to support any assertion(s) made by the permanent resident, or that may have been made on behalf of that permanent resident.
Line 14:		Line 14:
	A foreign national or permanent resident can be determined “inadmissible” to Canada for several reasons, including, but not limited to:		A foreign national or permanent resident can be determined “inadmissible” to Canada for several reasons, including, but not limited to:

	*Committing a serious crime;		* Committing a serious crime;
	*Being found to have misrepresented information in their immigration application;		* Being found to have misrepresented information in their immigration application;
	*Medical reasons that endanger public health and safety;		* Medical reasons that endanger and/or burden public health and safety;
	*~~If you are~~ unable or unwilling to support ~~yourself~~ and ~~your~~ family members.		* Being unable or unwilling to support themselves and their family members.

	Inadmissibility means that a foreign national or permanent resident has contravened the IRPA in some way and may be issued a removal order.		Inadmissibility means that a foreign national or permanent resident has contravened the IRPA in some way and may be issued a removal order.

	There are three types of removal orders, which are discussed ~~below~~.		There are three types of removal orders, which are discussed in [[Section_X \| Section X of this chapter]].

	If a permanent resident is deemed inadmissible, they may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).		If a permanent resident is deemed inadmissible, they may lose their permanent resident status. The inadmissibility provisions relating to foreign nationals and permanent residents overlap for the most part, but there are some differences. For example, permanent residents will be inadmissible for serious criminality if they commit an indictable offence, while foreign nationals will be inadmissible for committing a less serious summary offence. Refer to the IRPA directly for specific grounds of inadmissibility (ss 34 – 43).
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded from refugee protection in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.		:'''NOTE:''' Convention refugees are not inadmissible on the same health and criminality grounds as most other kinds of applicants, but they may be excluded from refugee protection in cases of serious criminality or crimes against humanity.

	:'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 SCC 50]). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[Immigration_Issues_at_Sentencing_(18:XIII)\|XIII: Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].		:'''NOTE:''' '''A permanent resident sentenced to 6 months or more of incarceration''' (including time in custody awaiting trial) is inadmissible to Canada and '''does not have an appeal to the IAD''' of their removal. This means that permanent residents who are arrested and charged with crimes, even relatively minor ones, must ensure their criminal counsel are aware of this consequence from the beginning of the criminal process. A conditional sentence does not equal imprisonment for the purposes of this provision and sentencing must be considered at the time of conviction (see [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2017/2017scc50/2017scc50.html?autocompleteStr=Tran%20v%20Canada%20(Public%20Safety%20and%20Emergency%20Preparedness)%2C%202017%20SCC%2050&autocompletePos=1 ''Tran v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)'', 2017 SCC 50]). Users of this manual should check for developments in this area of the law as it is undergoing continued legal development. See also [[Immigration_Issues_at_Sentencing_(18:XIII)\|Section XIII: Immigration Issues at Sentencing]].


	{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-23}}		{{LSLAP Manual Navbox\|type=chapters15-23}}