Talk:Family Violence - Revision history

Nate Russell at 00:16, 26 June 2013

2013-06-26T00:16:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 26 June 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
			==New DOJ resources for child protection==
			Does one of the editors want to check and then described and/or add this new [http://canada.justice.gc.ca/eng/fl-df/parent/pc-pe.html DOJ resource] somewhere on this page? --[[User:Nate Russell\|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell\|talk]]) 17:16, 25 June 2013 (PDT)

	==Resources==		==Resources==

Jpboyd: /* Subject matter expert */ new section

2013-05-21T05:19:41Z

Subject matter expert: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 21 May 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:
	6. In terms of ''Resources and links'', I took out the Dial-a-Law Dating Violence script (not relevant) and added the LSS family law website stuff on child protection. But the text does not seem to be fitting inside the text box - you can see the problem in View. (I hunted about to try to solve this but could not.)		6. In terms of ''Resources and links'', I took out the Dial-a-Law Dating Violence script (not relevant) and added the LSS family law website stuff on child protection. But the text does not seem to be fitting inside the text box - you can see the problem in View. (I hunted about to try to solve this but could not.)
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

			== Subject matter expert ==

			The portion about child protection could use a review by someone expert in the subject.
			[[User:Jpboyd\|JP Boyd]] ([[User talk:Jpboyd\|talk]]) 22:19, 20 May 2013 (PDT)

Jpboyd: /* Focus */

2013-05-21T04:56:23Z

Focus

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:56, 21 May 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:

	6. In terms of ''Resources and links'', I took out the Dial-a-Law Dating Violence script (not relevant) and added the LSS family law website stuff on child protection. But the text does not seem to be fitting inside the text box - you can see the problem in View. (I hunted about to try to solve this but could not.)		6. In terms of ''Resources and links'', I took out the Dial-a-Law Dating Violence script (not relevant) and added the LSS family law website stuff on child protection. But the text does not seem to be fitting inside the text box - you can see the problem in View. (I hunted about to try to solve this but could not.)
	~~[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)~~

	~~==Focus==~~

	This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . . If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there. The website has a how-to focus rather than a learning focus, and is for people who are dealing with the issue under discussion (and their intermediaries).
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid at 23:46, 5 May 2013

2013-05-05T23:46:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 5 May 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:
	This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . . If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there. The website has a how-to focus rather than a learning focus, and is for people who are dealing with the issue under discussion (and their intermediaries).		This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . . If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there. The website has a how-to focus rather than a learning focus, and is for people who are dealing with the issue under discussion (and their intermediaries).
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

	~~==Section on Drawbacks of tort claims==~~
	~~In 3.1, the '''Drawbacks of tort claims''' there is a sentence in para 3 that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . . Is this in context here?~~
	~~[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)~~

Gayla Reid at 23:44, 5 May 2013

2013-05-05T23:44:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:44, 5 May 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:

	==Section on Drawbacks of tort claims==		==Section on Drawbacks of tort claims==
	In 3.1, the '''Drawbacks of tort claims''' there is a sentence that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . . Is this in context here?		In 3.1, the '''Drawbacks of tort claims''' there is a sentence in para 3 that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . . Is this in context here?
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid at 23:43, 5 May 2013

2013-05-05T23:43:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 5 May 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:

	==Section on Drawbacks of tort claims==		==Section on Drawbacks of tort claims==
	~~Under~~ the '''Drawbacks of tort ~~claim~~''' there is a sentence that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . . Is this in context here?		In 3.1, the '''Drawbacks of tort claims''' there is a sentence that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . . Is this in context here?
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid at 23:43, 5 May 2013

2013-05-05T23:43:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 5 May 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

	==Section on Drawbacks of tort ~~law~~==		==Section on Drawbacks of tort claims==
	Under the '''Drawbacks of tort ~~law~~''' there is a sentence that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . . Is this in context here?		Under the '''Drawbacks of tort claim''' there is a sentence that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . . Is this in context here?
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid: /* Section on Drawbacks of tort law */

2013-05-05T23:41:58Z

Section on Drawbacks of tort law

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 5 May 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:

	==Section on Drawbacks of tort law==		==Section on Drawbacks of tort law==
	Under the '''Drawbacks of tort law''' there is a ~~comment~~, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' Is this in context here?		Under the '''Drawbacks of tort law''' there is a sentence that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . . Is this in context here?
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid at 23:41, 5 May 2013

2013-05-05T23:41:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 5 May 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:
	This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . . If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there. The website has a how-to focus rather than a learning focus, and is for people who are dealing with the issue under discussion (and their intermediaries).		This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . . If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there. The website has a how-to focus rather than a learning focus, and is for people who are dealing with the issue under discussion (and their intermediaries).
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

			==Section on Drawbacks of tort law==
			Under the '''Drawbacks of tort law''' there is a comment, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' Is this in context here?
			[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid at 23:21, 5 May 2013

2013-05-05T23:21:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 5 May 2013
Line 17:		Line 17:
	==Focus==		==Focus==

	This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . . If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there.		This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . . If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there. The website has a how-to focus rather than a learning focus, and is for people who are dealing with the issue under discussion (and their intermediaries).
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)