Talk:Indigenous Families - Revision history

Nate Russell: Nate Russell moved page Talk:Aboriginal Families to Talk:Indigenous Families: new title for edition 2020

2022-08-10T22:44:52Z

Nate Russell moved page Talk:Aboriginal Families to Talk:Indigenous Families: new title for edition 2020

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 10 August 2022
(No difference)

Nate Russell: Nate Russell moved page Talk:Aboriginal Family Law Issues to Talk:Aboriginal Families

2017-07-20T17:58:32Z

Nate Russell moved page Talk:Aboriginal Family Law Issues to Talk:Aboriginal Families

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:58, 20 July 2017
(No difference)

Jpboyd: /* Subject matter expert */ new section

2013-05-21T04:34:17Z

Subject matter expert: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:34, 21 May 2013
Line 11:		Line 11:

	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 19:45, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 19:45, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

			== Subject matter expert ==

			This page should be reviewed by a subject matter expert.
			[[User:Jpboyd\|JP Boyd]] ([[User talk:Jpboyd\|talk]]) 21:34, 20 May 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid at 23:12, 5 May 2013

2013-05-05T23:12:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:12, 5 May 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Suggestions?		Suggestions?

			3. The section on '''Access, parenting time and contact''', uses only the term "access" in its final paragraph. Does this matter?

	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 19:45, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 19:45, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid at 02:45, 1 May 2013

2013-05-01T02:45:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 1 May 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Hi JP and Nate~~

	I ~~have made some substantive changes here you will want~~ to ~~check~~.		1.'''Language''': I use Aboriginal (capitalized)to include "Indians," Inuit and Metis - but use First Nations rather than "Indians." I refer to heritage rather than "roots." I do not use "native."

	1. '''~~In the introduction~~''', ~~I just refer to the Indian Act~~, ~~rather than talking about~~ the ~~federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians~~ . ~~. . Where~~ the ~~text recommends~~ that ~~readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''',~~ I ~~added "who has expertise~~ in ~~Aboriginal law." See what you think~~.		2. In '''Resources and links''' I removed Native Community Law Offices (gone, alas, and grievously missed) and put in the current LSS services. I took out the Native Friendship Centre suggestion because Clicklaw seems to offer only one that I can see - in Quesnel. (I would have thought folks would go to the Friendship Centre - am I missing something here?)

	~~2. '''In~~ the ~~information about paying child support~~'~~'', I changed the first couple of sentences~~ to ~~make it more simple~~. ~~(I also put in some para breaks~~.)		BTW they go to the Courtworkers, who aren't funded to do family . . .

	3. '''Language''': I use Aboriginal (capitalized) in the standard way (to include "Indians," Inuit and Metis) - but use First Nations rather than "Indians." I refer to heritage rather than "roots." I do not use "native."		Suggestions?

	~~4. In '''Resources and links''' I removed Native Community Law Offices~~ (~~gone~~, ~~alas, alas, and grievously missed~~) ~~and put in the current LSS services. I took out the Native Friendship Centre suggestion because Clicklaw seems to offer only one I can see - in Quesnel.~~		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 19:45, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid at 04:39, 22 April 2013

2013-04-22T04:39:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 22 April 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.		I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.

	1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . . Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "~~'''~~who has expertise in Aboriginal law~~'''~~". See what you think.		1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . . Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "who has expertise in Aboriginal law." See what you think.

	2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)		2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)

Gayla Reid at 04:38, 22 April 2013

2013-04-22T04:38:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:38, 22 April 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.		I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.

	1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . . Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''. See what you think.		1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . . Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''". See what you think.

	2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)		2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)

Gayla Reid at 04:38, 22 April 2013

2013-04-22T04:38:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:38, 22 April 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.		I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.

	1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . . Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''. ~~If a reader needed help with on- and off-reserve issues and was phoning Lawyer Referral, that could be helpful. . . '''~~See what you think.~~'''~~		1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . . Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''. See what you think.


	2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)		2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)

Gayla Reid at 04:37, 22 April 2013

2013-04-22T04:37:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:37, 22 April 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.		I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.

	1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . . Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''.~~" (~~If a reader needed help with on- and off-reserve issues and was phoning Lawyer Referral, that could be helpful. . .) '''See what you think.'''		1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . . Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''. If a reader needed help with on- and off-reserve issues and was phoning Lawyer Referral, that could be helpful. . . '''See what you think.'''

Gayla Reid at 04:36, 22 April 2013

2013-04-22T04:36:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:36, 22 April 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.		I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.

	1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . .		1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . . Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''." (If a reader needed help with on- and off-reserve issues and was phoning Lawyer Referral, that could be helpful. . .) '''See what you think.'''


	2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)		2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)
Line 9:		Line 10:
	3. '''Language''': I use Aboriginal (capitalized) in the standard way (to include "Indians," Inuit and Metis) - but use First Nations rather than "Indians." I refer to heritage rather than "roots." I do not use "native."		3. '''Language''': I use Aboriginal (capitalized) in the standard way (to include "Indians," Inuit and Metis) - but use First Nations rather than "Indians." I refer to heritage rather than "roots." I do not use "native."

	4. Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''." (If a reader needed help with on- and off-reserve issues and was phoning Lawyer Referral, that could be helpful. . .) '''See what you think.'''		4. In '''Resources and links''' I removed Native Community Law Offices (gone, alas, alas, and grievously missed) and put in the current LSS services. I took out the Native Friendship Centre suggestion because Clicklaw seems to offer only one I can see - in Quesnel.

	5. In '''Resources and links''' I removed Native Community Law Offices (gone, alas, alas, and grievously missed) and put in the current LSS services. I took out Native Friendship Centre suggestion because Clicklaw seems to offer only one I can see - in Quesnel.