Talk:Understanding the Legal System for Family Law Matters - Revision history

Nate Russell: Nate Russell moved page Talk:Introduction to the Legal System for Family Matters to Talk:Understanding the Legal System for Family Law Matters: From staging May 2022

2022-05-18T20:53:00Z

Nate Russell moved page Talk:Introduction to the Legal System for Family Matters to Talk:Understanding the Legal System for Family Law Matters: From staging May 2022

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 18 May 2022
(No difference)

Gayla Reid at 23:19, 5 May 2013

2013-05-05T23:19:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 5 May 2013
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

	I see that the formatting of the first paragraph issue '''has been addressed'''. Is there a way of deleting discussion when the issue has been addressed?		'''May 4''': I see that the formatting of the first paragraph issue '''has been addressed'''. Is there a way of deleting discussion when the issue has been addressed?

	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]])		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]])

Gayla Reid at 23:18, 5 May 2013

2013-05-05T23:18:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 5 May 2013
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Some chapters and sections are aligned in this way; some are not. I started noting the ones that were not but gave up.		Some chapters and sections are aligned in this way; some are not. I started noting the ones that were not but gave up.
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

			I see that the formatting of the first paragraph issue '''has been addressed'''. Is there a way of deleting discussion when the issue has been addressed?

			[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]])

Gayla Reid: /* Formatting of first paragraph */

2013-05-01T02:05:03Z

Formatting of first paragraph

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 1 May 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:


	==Formatting of first paragraph==		==Formatting of first paragraph - an issue throughout==
	Somewhat odd space before the first para here. You might want to check formatting.		Somewhat odd space before the first para here. You might want to check formatting.

Gayla Reid: /* Formatting of first paragraph */

2013-04-30T23:55:25Z

Formatting of first paragraph

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, 30 April 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Somewhat odd space before the first para here. You might want to check formatting.		Somewhat odd space before the first para here. You might want to check formatting.

	To my eye, we'd want the first para to align with the top of the graphic about the book format. ~~Visually~~ important.		To my eye, we'd want the first para to align with the top of the graphic about the book format. It's visually important.

	Some chapters and sections are aligned; some are not. I started noting the ones that were not but gave up.		Some chapters and sections are aligned in this way; some are not. I started noting the ones that were not but gave up.
	[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (PDT)		[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

Gayla Reid: /* Formatting of first paragraph */

2013-04-30T23:53:39Z

Formatting of first paragraph

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 30 April 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Formatting of first paragraph==		==Formatting of first paragraph==
	Somewhat odd space before the first para ~~begins~~ here. You might want to check formatting.		Somewhat odd space before the first para here. You might want to check formatting.

	To my eye, we'd want the first para to align with the top of the graphic about the book format. Visually important.		To my eye, we'd want the first para to align with the top of the graphic about the book format. Visually important.

Gayla Reid at 23:53, 30 April 2013

2013-04-30T23:53:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 30 April 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:


	Somewhat odd space before the first para begins here. You might want to check formatting. GR		==Formatting of first paragraph==
			Somewhat odd space before the first para begins here. You might want to check formatting.

			To my eye, we'd want the first para to align with the top of the graphic about the book format. Visually important.

			Some chapters and sections are aligned; some are not. I started noting the ones that were not but gave up.
			[[User:Gayla Reid\|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

Nate Russell at 23:04, 30 April 2013

2013-04-30T23:04:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 30 April 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Use Discussion Pages like this one for editorial side-talk ==		== Use Discussion Pages like this one for editorial side-talk ==
	It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ideas for a given article, rather than place comments in the content of articles directly. We will see a lower incident of editorial notes being left to confuse readers if we take to this convention now [[User:Nate\|Nate]] ([[User talk:Nate\|talk]]) 17:49, 18 February 2013 (MST)		It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ideas for a given article, rather than place comments in the content of articles directly. We will see a lower incident of editorial notes being left to confuse readers if we take to this convention now [[User:Nate\|Nate]] ([[User talk:Nate\|talk]]) 17:49, 18 February 2013 (MST)
			: One more thing. Be vigilant about signing your entries on the Discussion page with four tilde marks. [[User:Nate Russell\|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell\|talk]]) 16:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)


	Somewhat odd space before the first para begins here. You might want to check formatting. GR		Somewhat odd space before the first para begins here. You might want to check formatting. GR

Gayla Reid at 23:28, 29 April 2013

2013-04-29T23:28:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 29 April 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ideas for a given article, rather than place comments in the content of articles directly. We will see a lower incident of editorial notes being left to confuse readers if we take to this convention now [[User:Nate\|Nate]] ([[User talk:Nate\|talk]]) 17:49, 18 February 2013 (MST)		It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ideas for a given article, rather than place comments in the content of articles directly. We will see a lower incident of editorial notes being left to confuse readers if we take to this convention now [[User:Nate\|Nate]] ([[User talk:Nate\|talk]]) 17:49, 18 February 2013 (MST)

	Somewhat odd space before the first para begins here. You might want to check formatting.

			Somewhat odd space before the first para begins here. You might want to check formatting. GR

Gayla Reid at 23:28, 29 April 2013

2013-04-29T23:28:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 29 April 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Use Discussion Pages like this one for editorial side-talk ==		== Use Discussion Pages like this one for editorial side-talk ==
	It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ideas for a given article, rather than place comments in the content of articles directly. We will see a lower incident of editorial notes being left to confuse readers if we take to this convention now [[User:Nate\|Nate]] ([[User talk:Nate\|talk]]) 17:49, 18 February 2013 (MST)		It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ideas for a given article, rather than place comments in the content of articles directly. We will see a lower incident of editorial notes being left to confuse readers if we take to this convention now [[User:Nate\|Nate]] ([[User talk:Nate\|talk]]) 17:49, 18 February 2013 (MST)

			Somewhat odd space before the first para begins here. You might want to check formatting.