Anonymous

ICBC and Basic Compulsory Autoplan Coverage (12:X): Difference between revisions

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{LSLAP 12 Old System Notice}}
{{LSLAP 12 Old System Notice}}


ICBC is the sole provider of basic insurance for non-exempt vehicles in BC.  Exempt vehicles are described in sections 43–44 of the ''IVA'' and also in section 2 of the ''IVR''.  For most vehicles owned, leased, or operated in BC, third-party liability coverage up to $200,000 is only available from ICBC.  Full coverage for exempt vehicles, extended coverage in excess of the basic coverage (third party liability insurance over $200,000, ''IVR'', s 67), and collision (“own damage”) insurance may be purchased from either ICBC or from private insurers. See [[Optional ICBC Insurance (12:XI)|Section XI: Optional Insurance]], below. Note that private insurers may have their own requirement for coverage that may be above and beyond the requirements of ICBC
ICBC is the sole provider of basic insurance for non-exempt vehicles in BC.  Exempt vehicles are described in sections 43–44 of the ''IVA'' and also in section 2 of the ''IVR''.  For most vehicles owned, leased, or operated in BC, third-party liability coverage up to $200,000 is only available from ICBC.  Full coverage for exempt vehicles, extended coverage in excess of the basic coverage (third party liability insurance over $200,000, ''IVR'', s 67), and collision (“own damage”) insurance may be purchased from either ICBC or from private insurers. See [[Optional ICBC Insurance (12:XI)|Section XI: Optional Insurance]], below. Private insurers may have their own requirement for coverage that may be above and beyond the requirements of ICBC


Vehicles licensed in BC are required by law to carry basic compulsory coverage, which is evidenced by a certificate of automobile insurance issued under the ''IVA'' to someone licensed under the ''MVA'' (i.e., the “insured”).  
Vehicles licensed in BC must carry basic compulsory coverage, evidenced by a certificate of automobile insurance issued under the ''IVA'' to someone licensed under the ''MVA'' (i.e., the “insured”).  


'''NOTE''': The definition of “the insured” varies somewhat from section to section in the ''IVA'' and ''IVR''.
'''NOTE''': The definition of “the insured” varies somewhat from section to section in the ''IVA'' and ''IVR''.
Line 25: Line 25:
=== 1. Indemnity ===
=== 1. Indemnity ===


This insurance indemnifies the insured against liability imposed on the insured by law for the injury or death of another, and/or loss or damage to another’s property, to a total limit of $200,000 (''IVR'', s 67), to be shared among the victims of a motor vehicle accident (Schedule 3, s 1). The base limit of liability is $500,000 in claims made for a bus, and $300,000 in claims made for a taxi or limousine. Extended Third-Party Legal Liability coverage may be purchased at the insured’s discretion. ([[Optional ICBC Insurance (12:XI)|See Section XI: Optional Insurance,]] below). '''If the insured is found legally liable, and no extended coverage has been purchased, they are responsible for payment of any claims in excess of the above limits.'''
This insurance indemnifies the insured against liability for the injury or death of another, and/or loss or damage to another’s property, up to $200,000 (''IVR'', s 67), to be shared among the victims of a motor vehicle accident (Schedule 3, s 1). The base limit of liability is $500,000 for buses and $300,000 for taxis or limousines. Extended Third Party Legal Liability coverage may be purchased. (See Section XII: Optional Insurance, below). '''If the insured is found legally liable, and has no extended coverage, they are responsible for payment of any claims in excess of the above limits'''.


As of September 16, 2019, ICBC introduced a new insurance category (blanket insurance certificate) for transportation network services (TNS) or ride-hailing companies such as Uber and Lyft. The blanket basic coverage provides coverage up to $1,000,000 third party liability when the vehicle is a) hailed by passengers through the online platform and b) is operated to transport the passengers (''IVR'', s 154). This blanket coverage is not for individual drivers and it is mandatory for ride-hailing companies.
As of September 16, 2019, ICBC offers a new insurance category (blanket insurance certificate) for transportation network services (TNS) or ride-hailing companies. It provides coverage up to $1,000,000 third party liability when the vehicle is a) hailed by passengers through the online platform and b) is operated to transport the passengers (''IVR'', s 154). This blanket coverage is mandatory for ride-hailing companies, not for individual drivers.


=== 2. Who is Covered ===
=== 2. Who is Covered ===
Line 42: Line 42:
=== 3. Extension of Indemnity ===
=== 3. Extension of Indemnity ===


According to ''IVR'', s 65, indemnity is extended to an insured who operates a motor vehicle not described in an owner’s certificate issued to the insured (i.e., someone else’s car).
According to ''IVR'', s 65, indemnity is extended to an insured who operates a motor vehicle not described in an owner’s certificate issued to the insured (i.e., someone else’s car). For the purposes of s 65 only, “insured” includes the following:
For the purposes of s 65 only, “insured” includes the following:
   
   
:(a) a person named as an owner in an owner’s certificate;
:(a) a person named as an owner in an owner’s certificate;
Line 50: Line 49:
:(d) the spouse of an employee or partner described in paragraph (c) where the spouse resides with the employee or partner.
:(d) the spouse of an employee or partner described in paragraph (c) where the spouse resides with the employee or partner.


Note that, absent this expanded definition, “insured” would not otherwise cover a member of the insured’s household operating a vehicle not described in an owner’s certificate issued to the insured.
As of September 1, 2019, ICBC requires drivers to list out all the household members who may drive their vehicles, regardless of the number of times they may drive it, and non-household members who may drive the insured’s vehicle more than 12 times a year. The additional drivers are factored into the premium calculation.


As of September 1, 2019, ICBC requires drivers to list out all the household members who may drive their vehicles, regardless of the number of times they may drive it. In addition, non-household members such as employees who may be driving the insured’s vehicle for more than 12 times a year will also be required to be listed at the time of purchasing the policy. The additional members listed will be factored into the calculation for the premium paid.
See [www.icbc.com/insurance/costs/drivers-experience-crash-history/Pages/Default.aspx ICBC's webpage on who should be listed as a driver] for more information.


If a household member or non-household member, who was not listed on the principal’s policy, gets involved in an accident, ICBC will have the right to impose a financial penalty on the principal’s policy and the principal may also be subjected to a higher premium rate when renewing the policy in the future.
If an unlisted driver is in an accident, ICBC can impose a financial penalty on the principal’s policy and a higher premium rate when the principal renews the policy in the future.


=== 4. Restrictions on Indemnity ===
=== 4. Restrictions on Indemnity ===


Section 65(2) of the ''IVR'' states that if an insured is operating a motor vehicle that is not described in an owner’s certificate issued to them, indemnity is not extended to the insured if:
Section 65(2) of the ''IVR'' states that if an insured is operating a motor vehicle that is not described in an owner’s certificate issued to them, indemnity is not extended to the insured if:
*the insured is operating the motor vehicle in connection with the business of a garage service operator;
*the vehicle is operated in connection with the business of a garage service operator;
*the motor vehicle is owned or regularly operated by the insured;
*the motor vehicle is owned or regularly operated by the insured;
*the motor vehicle is for commercial use,
*the motor vehicle is for commercial use,
**In respect of a TNS-only vehicle operated under a transportation network services authorization, the corporation's exemption applies only if injury or death of another, or loss or damage to property of another, arises out of the operation of the TNS-only vehicle when
***(a) the vehicle has been hailed by or for passengers through the use of the online platform to which the transportation network services authorization relates, and
***(b) the insured is operating the vehicle for the purposes of picking up, transporting or dropping off those passengers.
*the motor vehicle is in fact not licensed under the MVA (or similar legislation) and the insured does not have reasonable grounds to believe the motor vehicle is licensed; or
*the insured is operating the vehicle without the consent of the owner and does not have reasonable grounds to believe that they have the consent of the owner.


Section 77 provides, in part, that an owner seeking to rely on the coverage provided for a vehicle not named in the owner’s certificate cannot do so if they also own (or lease) the non-described vehicle that has been involved in the accident (i.e. you cannot just insure one vehicle and expect this to cover all of the other vehicles in your fleet).
For a TNS-only vehicle operated under a transportation network services authorization, the corporation's exemption applies only if injury or death of another, or loss or damage to property of another, arises out of the operation of the TNS-only vehicle when
:(a) the vehicle has been hailed by or for passengers through the use of the online platform to which the transportation network services authorization relates, and
:(b) the insured is operating the vehicle for the purposes of picking up, transporting or dropping off those passengers.
:(c) the motor vehicle is in fact not licensed under the MVA (or similar legislation) and the insured does not have reasonable grounds to believe the motor vehicle is licensed; or
:(d) the insured is operating the vehicle without the consent of the owner and does not have reasonable grounds to believe that they have the consent of the owner.  


Neither garage service operators nor their employees are covered by the owner’s certificate issued for customers’ vehicles while the vehicle is in the care, custody, or control of the garage service operator or their employee for a purpose relating to the business. “Garage service operator” is defined in Part 1 of the ''IVR'' as “the operator of a motor vehicle service facility and includes a dealer, service station operator, motor vehicle repairman, auto body shop repairman, wrecker operator, and the operator of a vehicle parking or storage facility” (s 57). To offset the effect of s 57, the garage service operator must obtain special coverage pursuant to s 150.
Section 77 provides that an owner seeking to rely on the coverage provided for a vehicle not named in the owner’s certificate cannot do so if they also own (or lease) the non-described vehicle that has been involved in the accident (i.e. you cannot just insure one vehicle and expect this to cover all of the other vehicles in your fleet).
 
Garage service operators and their employees are '''not''' covered by the owner’s certificate issued for customers’ vehicles while the vehicle is in their care, custody, or control. “Garage service operator” is defined in Part 1 of the ''IVR'' as “the operator of a motor vehicle service facility and includes a dealer, service station operator, motor vehicle repairman, auto body shop repairman, wrecker operator, and the operator of a vehicle parking or storage facility” (s 57). To offset the effect of s 57, the garage service operator must obtain special coverage pursuant to s 150.


=== 5. What is Covered ===
=== 5. What is Covered ===


In addition to the legal liability coverage (i.e., s 65 indemnification) outlined above, ''IVR'' ss 67 and 69 states that ICBC may also pay for:
In addition to the legal liability coverage outlined above, ''IVR'' s 67 and 69 states that ICBC may also pay for:
:(a) reimburse an insured for reasonable payments for emergency medical aid necessary to a person injured as the result of an accident for which indemnity is payable under this Part, if reimbursement is not provided to the insured under another Part or by another insurer,
:(a) reimbursement an insured for reasonable payments for emergency medical aid necessary to a person injured as the result of an accident for which indemnity is payable under this Part, if reimbursement is not provided to the insured under another Part or by another insurer,
:(b) pay costs incurred for fire extinguishers, jacks or other necessary emergency equipment or supplies provided to the insured,
:(b) costs incurred for fire extinguishers, jacks or other necessary emergency equipment or supplies provided to the insured,
:(c) pay that proportion of the costs taxed against an insured in an action respecting a claim under this Part that
:(c) pay that proportion of the costs taxed against an insured in an action respecting a claim under this Part that
::(1) the amount offered by the corporation as its total liability for indemnity to the insured under this Part in an offer to settle served in accordance with the Supreme Court Civil Rules bears to
::(1) the amount offered by the corporation as its total liability for indemnity to the insured under this Part in an offer to settle served in accordance with the Supreme Court Civil Rules bears to
Line 82: Line 82:
:(d) pay
:(d) pay
::(1) prejudgment interest under the Court Order Interest Act or similar legislation of another jurisdiction, and
::(1) prejudgment interest under the Court Order Interest Act or similar legislation of another jurisdiction, and
::(2) post-judgment interest under the Interest Act (Canada) or similar legislation of another jurisdiction
::(2) post-judgment interest under the Interest Act (Canada) or similar legislation of another jurisdiction
on that part of the judgment that is within the applicable limit set out in section 1 of Schedule 3, and
on that part of the judgment that is within the applicable limit set out in section 1 of Schedule 3, and
:(e) if indemnity is provided to the insured under this Part and by one or more optional insurance contracts provided by an insurer other than the corporation, contribute to the payment of expenses, costs and reimbursements for which provision is made under section 172 in accordance with that other insurer's and the corporation's respective liabilities for
:(e) if indemnity is provided to the insured under this Part and by one or more optional insurance contracts provided by an insurer other than the corporation, contribute to the payment of expenses, costs and reimbursements for which provision is made under section 172 in accordance with that other insurer's and the corporation's respective liabilities for
Line 90: Line 90:
=== 6. What is Not Covered ===
=== 6. What is Not Covered ===


ICBC will ''not'' indemnify an insured for certain types of damage, including:
ICBC will ''not'' indemnify an insured for:
*loss or damage to property carried in or on a vehicle owned, rented or in the care, custody or control of an insured (s 72.1); or
*loss or damage to property carried in or on a vehicle owned, rented or in the care, custody or control of an insured (s 72.1); or
*liability directly or indirectly arising out of the operation of attached equipment (i.e., machinery or equipment that is mounted on or attached to the vehicle, and which is not required for the safe operation of that vehicle) at a site where such equipment is operated, unless the attached equipment is used in accordance with the ''IVR'' (s 72(2)); or
*liability arising out of the operation of attached equipment (which is not required for the safe operation of that vehicle) at a site where such equipment is operated, unless the attached equipment is used in accordance with the ''IVR'' (s 72(2)); or
*under Part 4, 6, 7, or 10 in respect of injury, death, loss or damage arising, directly or indirectly, out of radioactive, toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of nuclear substances within the meaning of the ''Nuclear Safety and Control Act'' (Canada), s 56(1)(a)); or  
*under Part 4, 6, 7, or 10 in respect of injury, death, loss or damage arising, directly or indirectly, out of radioactive, toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of nuclear substances within the meaning of the ''Nuclear Safety and Control Act'' (Canada), s 56(1)(a)); or  
*under sections 20 or 24 of the Act or section 49.3, Part 7 or Part 10 of the ''IVR'' in respect of any injury, death, loss or damage arising, directly or indirectly out of a declared or undeclared war or insurrection, rebellion or revolution (''IVR'', s 56(1)(b)); or
*under sections 20 or 24 of the Act or section 49.3, Part 7 or Part 10 of the ''IVR'' in respect of any injury, death, loss or damage arising, directly or indirectly out of a declared or undeclared war or insurrection, rebellion or revolution (''IVR'', s 56(1)(b)); or
*under ''IVA'', ss 20 or s 24, under ''IVR'', ss 49 or 49.3(1)(b), Part 6 or Part 10 in respect of punitive or exemplary damages or other similar non-compensatory damages (''IVR'', s 56(1)(c)); or
*under ''IVA'', ss 20 or s 24, under ''IVR'', ss 49 or 49.3(1)(b), Part 6 or Part 10 in respect of punitive or exemplary damages or other similar non-compensatory damages (''IVR'', s 56(1)(c)); or
*a general or special assessment, penalty or premium, payable under the ''Workers’ Compensation Act'' (British Columbia) or similar Act (''IVR'', s 72.1(1)(a)).
*assessments, penalties or premiums, payable under the ''Workers’ Compensation Act'' (British Columbia) or similar Act (''IVR'', s 72.1(1)(a)).


=== 7. Duties of the Insured ===
=== 7. Duties of the Insured ===
Line 114: Line 114:
:(3) If the premium for a vehicle is established on the basis of the territory in which the vehicle is primarily located when not in use and that territory as set out in the owner's certificate is changed, the insured named on the certificate must, unless the vehicle is being used by the insured for vacation purposes, report the change to a person referred to in section 3 within 30 days of the change, and pay or be refunded the resulting difference in premium.
:(3) If the premium for a vehicle is established on the basis of the territory in which the vehicle is primarily located when not in use and that territory as set out in the owner's certificate is changed, the insured named on the certificate must, unless the vehicle is being used by the insured for vacation purposes, report the change to a person referred to in section 3 within 30 days of the change, and pay or be refunded the resulting difference in premium.


Furthermore, ICBC is not liable to indemnify an insured who, to the prejudice of ICBC, fails to comply with duties outlined in s 73 of the ''IVR''. This section states that an insured:
Furthermore, ICBC is not liable to indemnify an insured who, to the prejudice of ICBC, fails to comply with duties outlined in s 73 of the ''IVR'':


'''73'''
'''73'''
Line 138: Line 138:
=== 10. Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture ===
=== 10. Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture ===


Certain conduct by the insured or applicant can result in “forfeiture”, whereby the insured is deemed to have given up their right to be indemnified by ICBC.  In this situation, the claim for indemnification becomes invalid.  Apart from exclusions, a claim may be forfeited under s 75 of the ''IVA'' if:
Certain conduct by the insured or applicant can result in “forfeiture”, voiding their right to be indemnified by ICBC.  In this situation, the claim for indemnification becomes invalid.  A claim may be forfeited under s 75 of the ''IVA'' if:
:(a) an applicant for coverage falsely describes the vehicle in respect of which the application is made to the prejudice of the insurer (s 75(a)(i));
:(a) an applicant falsely describes the vehicle in respect of which the application is made to the prejudice of the insurer (s 75(a)(i));
:(b) an applicant for coverage knowingly misrepresents or fails to disclose a fact required to be stated in it (s 75(a)(ii));
:(b) an applicant for coverage knowingly misrepresents or fails to disclose a fact required to be stated (s 75(a)(ii));
:(c) then insured violates a term or condition of or commits a fraud in relation to the plan or the OIC (s 75(b); see [[{{PAGENAME}}#11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences | Section X.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences]];
:(c) An insured violates a term or condition of or commits a fraud in relation to the plan or the OIC (s 75(b), or makes a "willingly false statement regarding the claim (s 75(c)); see [[{{PAGENAME}}#11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences | Section X.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences]].
:(d) an insured makes a “wilfully false statement” with respect to the claim (s 75(c)).


:'''NOTE''': According to [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1994/1994canlii3304/1994canlii3304.html?autocompleteStr=brooks%20v%20insurance&autocompletePos=3 Brooks v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia], 1994 CanLII 3304 (BC SC), per Bouck J, the purpose of s 19(1)(e) (now ''IVA'', s 75(c)) is to prevent intentionally deceitful misstatements for the purpose of defrauding the insurer; “exaggerated guesses” by an insured as to the value of a lost motor vehicle, or figures inserted for the purpose of goading an insurer into action, are insufficient to deny coverage unless a fraudulent purpose on the part of the insured is shown.
:'''NOTE''': According to [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1994/1994canlii3304/1994canlii3304.html?autocompleteStr=brooks%20v%20insurance&autocompletePos=3 Brooks v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia], 1994 CanLII 3304 (BC SC), the purpose of s 19(1)(e) (now ''IVA'', s 75(c)) is to prevent intentionally deceitful misstatements for the purpose of defrauding the insurer. “Exaggerated guesses” by an insured as to the value of a lost motor vehicle, or figures meant to prompt an insurer into action, are insufficient to deny coverage without demonstrated fraudulent purpose.


However, ICBC may relieve the insured from forfeiture under s 75 if said forfeiture would be “inequitable”.  Furthermore, ICBC must relieve an insured from forfeiture if: a) it is equitable to do so, and b) the insured dies or suffers a loss of mind or bodily function that renders the insured permanently incapable of engaging in any occupation for wages or profit (''IVA'', s 19(3)).
However, ICBC may relieve the insured from forfeiture under s 75 if it would be “inequitable”.  Furthermore, ICBC '''must''' relieve an insured from forfeiture if: a) it is equitable to do so, and b) the insured dies or suffers a loss of mind or bodily function that renders the insured permanently incapable of engaging in any occupation for wages or profit (''IVA'', s 19(3)).


Because there are various definitions of “insured” in the ''IMVAR'' (and ''IVR''), the only reasonable interpretation of s 19 (the relief of forfeiture provision discussed above) is that it is to be read broadly to include all of the definitions: see ''Khatkar v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia'' (1993), 25 CCLI (2d) 243 (BC Prov. Ct.), per Stansfield Prov. Ct. J.
Due to the various definitions of “insured” in the ''IMVAR'' and ''IVR'', the only reasonable interpretation of s 19 (the relief of forfeiture provision discussed above) is that it is to be read broadly to include all of the definitions (''Khatkar v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia'' (1993), 25 CCLI (2d) 243 (BC Prov. Ct.), per Stansfield Prov. Ct. J).


=== 11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences ===
=== 11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences ===


Insured persons must be careful to abide by the terms and conditions of their plans and OICs. Coverage may be lost if an insured breaches certain conditions, including, but not limited to:
Insured persons must abide by the terms and conditions of their plans and OICs. Coverage may be lost if an insured breaches certain conditions, including, but not limited to:


:(a) failing to comply with s 73 of the ''IVR'', to the prejudice of ICBC [[{{PAGENAME}}#7. Duties of the Insured| See Section X.B.7: Duty of Insured]]
:(a) failing to comply with s 73 of the ''IVR'', to the prejudice of ICBC;
:(b) operating a vehicle when not authorized and/or not qualified to do so by law (''IVR'', s 55(3)(a));
:(b) operating a vehicle when not authorized and/or not qualified to do so by law (''IVR'', s 55(3)(a));
:(c) using the vehicle in illicit trades, racing, or to escape or avoid arrest or other similar police action (''IVR'', s 55(3)(b), (c) and (d));
:(c) using the vehicle in illicit trades, racing, or to escape or avoid arrest or other similar police action (''IVR'', s 55(3)(b), (c) and (d));
Line 161: Line 160:
:(f) naming in the owner’s certificate someone as the principal operator of the insured vehicle who is not actually the principal operator (''IVR'', s 75).
:(f) naming in the owner’s certificate someone as the principal operator of the insured vehicle who is not actually the principal operator (''IVR'', s 75).


:'''NOTE''': When the court determines who the principle driver is, it will consider the entire period covered by the insurance plan: see [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1981/1981canlii608/1981canlii608.html?resultIndex=1 ''Dehm v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia'', 1981 CanLII 608 (BC SC)].  
:'''NOTE''': When the court determines who the principle driver is, it will consider the entire period covered by the insurance plan ([https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1981/1981canlii608/1981canlii608.html?resultIndex=1 ''Dehm v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia'', 1981 CanLII 608 (BC SC)]).  


Despite any breach of condition by an insured, insurance money is still payable to third parties by ICBC in cases where the insured person was:
Despite any breach of condition by an insured, insurance money is still payable to third parties by ICBC in cases where the insured was:
:(a) incapable of properly controlling the vehicle because of the influence of alcohol or drugs;
:(a) incapable of properly controlling the vehicle because of the influence of alcohol or drugs;
:(b) convicted under any one of the following sections of the ''Criminal Code'', RSC 1985, c C-46 (see also ''MVA Regulations'', s 28.01 Table 4):   
:(b) convicted under any one of the following sections of the ''Criminal Code'', RSC 1985, c C-46 (see also ''MVA Regulations'', s 28.01 Table 4):   
Line 177: Line 176:
:*“similar result” or conviction of these offences in a jurisdiction in the U.S.; or
:*“similar result” or conviction of these offences in a jurisdiction in the U.S.; or
:*a conviction under ss 95 or 102 of the MVA or similar convictions under another Canadian or American jurisdiction (both concern driving while prohibited); or
:*a conviction under ss 95 or 102 of the MVA or similar convictions under another Canadian or American jurisdiction (both concern driving while prohibited); or
:(c) permitting another person to use the insured vehicle in a way that results in a conviction for any of the offences outlined above (IMVA Regulations, s 55).
:(c) permitting another person to use the insured vehicle in a way that results in a conviction for any of the offences outlined above (''IMVA Regulations'', s 55).


=== 12. Making a Claim Under Part 6: Procedural Steps and Considerations ===
=== 12. Making a Claim Under Part 6: Procedural Steps and Considerations ===
6,151

edits