Anonymous

Limitation on Experts (12:IX): Difference between revisions

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
m
no edit summary
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


Changes:
Changes:
# For fast-track claims (Rule 15-1 of the Supreme Court Rules), there will be a limit of one expert per party, ''EAA'' 12.1 (2)(b).
# For fast-track claims (Rule 15-1 of the Supreme Court Rules), there will be a limit of one expert per party (''EAA'' 12.1 (2)(b));
# For claims that are not conducted under the fast-track rule, that are not considered to be fast-track claims, there will be a maximum of three experts for each party, ''EAA'' 12.1 (2)(a).
# For claims that are not conducted under the fast-track rule, that are not considered to be fast-track claims, there will be a maximum of three experts for each party (''EAA'' 12.1 (2)(a));
# Parties involved in the claim can agree to use more experts than the limit if every party to the claim agrees, ''EAA'' 12.1 (4)(a)(b).
# Parties involved in the claim can agree to use more experts than the limit if every party to the claim agrees (''EAA'' 12.1 (4)(a)(b));
# ''EAA'' 12.1(5) provides a court with the discretion to allow for additional experts.
# ''EAA'' 12.1(5) provides a court with the discretion to allow for additional experts;
# A limit is placed on the maximum amount recoverable from an unsuccessful litigant to $3,000.00 per each expert report in motor vehicle personal injury cases, ''EAA'' 12.1 (9)(a)(i)(A). The total recoverable disbursements in motor vehicle personal injury cases will also be limited to 5% of the judgment or settlement, ''EAA'' 12.1 (9)(a)(i)(B).  
# A limit is placed on the maximum amount recoverable from an unsuccessful litigant to $3,000.00 per each expert report in motor vehicle personal injury cases (''EAA'' 12.1 (9)(a)(i)(A)). The total recoverable disbursements in motor vehicle personal injury cases will also be limited to 5% of the judgment or settlement (''EAA'' 12.1 (9)(a)(i)(B)).  


Exceptions:  
Exceptions:  
6,151

edits