Choosing the Proper Forum for Small Claims (20:IV)

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Revision as of 00:04, 4 July 2016 by Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = smallclaims}} There are several options for resolving most civil disputes in British Columbia: Alternative Dispute Resolution, specialised tribu...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search



There are several options for resolving most civil disputes in British Columbia: Alternative Dispute Resolution, specialised tribunals, Small Claims Court, and the Supreme Court of British Columbia. On May 31, 2012, the Civil Resolution Tribunal Act, SBC 2012, c 25 [CRTA] was given Royal Assent and may be proclaimed in force by regulation. Once in force, the Civil Resolution Tribunal will become another option for resolving civil disputes.

Certain claims must be made through administrative tribunals instead of the courts. See, for example, Chapter 9: Employment Law, Chapter 7: Workers’ Compensation, Chapter 8: Employment Insurance, Chapter 19: Landlord and Tenant Law, and Chapter 6: Human Rights.

In order to bring a claim in British Columbia, the court or tribunal must have territorial jurisdiction. If either the subject matter of the claim (e.g., the contract or wrongful act) occurred in British Columbia or the Defendant resides or does business in British Columbia, this may be a sufficient connection for a court or tribunal to assert jurisdiction. It is sometimes unclear whether British Columbia has a sufficient connection to the claim and is the most appropriate forum. If the court’ s jurisdiction is not clear, a claimant should obtain legal advice and review applicable case law16.

Where the dispute is contractual, the existence of a “forum selection clause” may provide further jurisdictional difficulties. Forum selection clauses require the adjudication of claims in the named jurisdiction. Such clauses will generally be upheld absent a finding of “strong cause” to hear the matter in the jurisdiction of another court17. A.Small Claims Court The Small Claims Court is the civil division of the British Columbia Provincial Court and is designed to accommodate unrepresented parties who do not have legal training. The overriding purpose of the Small Claims Court is to resolve disputes in a “just, speedy, inexpensive, and simple manner.”18The Court uses simplified forms, procedures, and rules and encourages settlement. Small Claims Court is a formal court that applies the law. Although the procedures and rules of evidence are slightly relaxed in order to make it more accessible to the public, it is significantly more formal and principled than the courts portrayed in television programmes. There are three primary considerations when choosing Small Claims Court: the amount claimed, the court’ s jurisdiction, and costs. 1.A mount Claimed Small Claims Court can award a judgment of up to $25,000.A person whose claim exceeds $25,000 may still choose Small Claims Court but must expressly state in the notice of claim or counterclaim that they will abandon the amount necessary to bring their claim or counterclaim within the court’ s jurisdiction19. Interest and costs are not included in calculating the $25,000 limit. A claimant must sue all responsible parties for damages arising from a single event in oneclaim; the claimant cannot split claims for damages arising out of a single event into multiple claims in an attempt to circumvent the $25,000 limit. If, however, there are multiple events giving rise to a claim, even if closely related, they may be brought in separate actions20. For