Difference between revisions of "Clicklaw Wikibooks Cheatsheet"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 107: Line 107:
::second indent
::second indent
:::third indent
:::third indent
|-<!--EXAMPLES-->
|-<!--CASELAW EXAMPLES-->
| colspan="3" style="background:#FFCC66; padding: 0.2em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;" | '''Examples'''
| colspan="3" style="background:#FFCC66; padding: 0.2em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;" | '''Working Example of a Case Citation and Link'''
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS-->
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS-->
| width="30%" style="background:#FFCC66; padding:0.3em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;"|Description
| width="30%" style="background:#FFCC66; padding:0.3em; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;"|Description

Revision as of 23:36, 3 June 2013

This is a help page for contributors or users.


See the Clicklaw Wikibooks Style Guide for style and word usage.

Clicklaw Wikibooks Cheatsheet

Works anywhere in the text
Description You type You get
Italic text

''italic''

italic

Bold text

'''bold'''

bold

Bold and italic text

'''''bold & italic'''''

bold & italic

Link to another Clicklaw wiki page

[[Name of page]]
[[Name of page|Text to display]]

Name of page
Text to display

Works only at the beginning of lines
Description You type You get
Section headings
A Table of Contents will automatically be generated when four headings are added to an article.
Do not use =Level 1=; it is reserved for page titles.

== Level 2 ==
=== Level 3 ===
==== Level 4 ====

Level 2
Level 3

Level 4

Bulleted list

* One
* Two
** Two point one
* Three

  • One
  • Two
    • Two point one
  • Three
Numbered list

# One
# Two
## Two point one
# Three

  1. One
  2. Two
    1. Two point one
  3. Three
Indenting text

no indent (normal)
:first indent
::second indent
:::third indent

no indent (normal)

first indent
second indent
third indent
Working Example of a Case Citation and Link
Description You type You get
Case reference
For linking and providing the proper citation of a case law, see Style Guide.

In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/2d35m Domirti v. Domirti]'', 2010 BCCA 472, the Court of Appeal ruled that a spousal support award outside the Advisory Guidelines could be an appealable error.

In Domirti v. Domirti, 2010 BCCA 472, the Court of Appeal ruled that a spousal support award outside the Advisory Guidelines could be an appealable error.