Difference between revisions of "Mental Health Theory and Approach (14:III)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = mentalhealth}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = mentalhealth}}


Admission to a mental health facility can seriously affect an individual’s rights. Textbooks have advocated a “functional” approach to mental health law, encouraging courts to consider only how the disability may relate to the specific issue brought before them. Incapacity in one area does not necessarily mean incapacity in all areas. Most mental health legislation, however, is over-inclusive, and therefore impairs the rights  of mentally ill persons in areas where they might have the mental capacity to act for themselves. The common-law tests for capacity can be found in Chapter 15: Adult Guardianship
Admission to a mental health facility can seriously affect an individual’s rights. Textbooks have advocated a “functional” approach to mental health law, encouraging courts to consider only how the disability may relate to the specific issue brought before them. Incapacity in one area does not necessarily mean incapacity in all areas. Most mental health legislation, however, is over-inclusive, and therefore impairs the rights  of mentally ill persons in areas where they might have the mental capacity to act for themselves. The common-law tests for capacity can be found in Chapter 15: Adult Guardianship.


Section 15(1) of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms'' [''Charter''] has made it easier to preserve the rights of those affected by mental health law. While most discriminatory legislation in BC remains unchallenged, the MHA "deemed consent provisions" and the HCCFA and Representation Agreement Act "substitute decision making" provisions, are currently being challenged as unconstitutional at the BC Supreme Court. This litigation isn’t expected to be resolved for quite some time however. All ''Charter'' challenges have been directed towards either the MHA, the HCCFA, or the ''Criminal Code''. The Community Legal Assistance Society may be able to assist with serious ''Charter'' challenges, including test litigation.
Section 15(1) of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms'' [''Charter''] has made it easier to preserve the rights of those affected by mental health law. While most discriminatory legislation in BC remains unchallenged, the MHA "deemed consent provisions" and the HCCFA and Representation Agreement Act "substitute decision making" provisions, are currently being challenged as unconstitutional at the BC Supreme Court (see MacLaren v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1753). This litigation isn’t expected to be resolved for quite some time however.  


All ''Charter'' challenges have been directed towards either the MHA, the HCCFA, or the ''Criminal Code''. The Community Legal Assistance Society may be able to assist with serious ''Charter'' challenges, including test litigation.


{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= July 29, 2019}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}

Revision as of 23:49, 23 November 2019



Admission to a mental health facility can seriously affect an individual’s rights. Textbooks have advocated a “functional” approach to mental health law, encouraging courts to consider only how the disability may relate to the specific issue brought before them. Incapacity in one area does not necessarily mean incapacity in all areas. Most mental health legislation, however, is over-inclusive, and therefore impairs the rights of mentally ill persons in areas where they might have the mental capacity to act for themselves. The common-law tests for capacity can be found in Chapter 15: Adult Guardianship.

Section 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [Charter] has made it easier to preserve the rights of those affected by mental health law. While most discriminatory legislation in BC remains unchallenged, the MHA "deemed consent provisions" and the HCCFA and Representation Agreement Act "substitute decision making" provisions, are currently being challenged as unconstitutional at the BC Supreme Court (see MacLaren v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCSC 1753). This litigation isn’t expected to be resolved for quite some time however.

All Charter challenges have been directed towards either the MHA, the HCCFA, or the Criminal Code. The Community Legal Assistance Society may be able to assist with serious Charter challenges, including test litigation.


This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on July 29, 2019.
© Copyright 2023, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society.