Criminal Charges (1:IV): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→e) Are there any other Exclusion Rules
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 236: | Line 236: | ||
Consider whether there are other exclusionary rules that could be used to exclude any key pieces of evidence that the Crown needs to prove its case. Generally, if a piece of evidence has more prejudicial effects than probative value, the evidence will be excluded (''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1991/1991canlii76/1991canlii76.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQARciB2IHNlYWJveWVyIDE5OTEAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=1 R v. Seaboyer]'' [1991] 2 SCR 577). | Consider whether there are other exclusionary rules that could be used to exclude any key pieces of evidence that the Crown needs to prove its case. Generally, if a piece of evidence has more prejudicial effects than probative value, the evidence will be excluded (''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1991/1991canlii76/1991canlii76.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQARciB2IHNlYWJveWVyIDE5OTEAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=1 R v. Seaboyer]'' [1991] 2 SCR 577). | ||
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters1-7}} | {{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters1-7}} | ||