Difference between revisions of "Factors That May Affect Welfare Eligibility (21:V)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 67: Line 67:
These family units are liable to repay the government, under section 27 of the EAA (s 18 of the EAPWDA), the amount or value of the overpayment that was the subject of the ''Criminal Code'' conviction and/or conviction under the EAA/EAPWDA and/or civil judgment. This amount is known as an “offence overpayment.”
These family units are liable to repay the government, under section 27 of the EAA (s 18 of the EAPWDA), the amount or value of the overpayment that was the subject of the ''Criminal Code'' conviction and/or conviction under the EAA/EAPWDA and/or civil judgment. This amount is known as an “offence overpayment.”


Section 89 and 89.1 of the EAR (74 and 74.1 of the EAPWDA) detail a minimum monthly welfare benefit deduction and repayment structure that applies to an “offence overpayment,” as well as the exemptions from those deductions.   The basic rule is a reduction of $100 per month reduction in welfare benefits for each person in a family unit who has an “offence overpayment.” Where a person was convicted under the Criminal Code, that deduction continues until the  amount of the overpayment is repaid in full. Where a person was convicted of a statutory offence under the EAA or EAPDA, that deduction continues for:  
Section 89 and 89.1 of the EAR (74 and 74.1 of the EAPWDA) detail a minimum monthly welfare benefit deduction and repayment structure that applies to an “offence overpayment,” as well as the exemptions from those deductions. The basic rule is a reduction of $100 per month reduction in welfare benefits for each person in a family unit who has an “offence overpayment.” Where a person was convicted under the ''Criminal Code'', that deduction continues until the  amount of the overpayment is repaid in full. Where a person was convicted of a statutory offence under the EAA or EAPDA, that deduction continues for:  
#12 months for a first conviction (unless the overpayment is repaid in less than 12 months)   
#12 months for a first conviction (unless the overpayment is repaid in less than 12 months)   
#24 months for   second conviction, (unless the overpayment is repaid in less than 24 months); and   
#24 months for second conviction, (unless the overpayment is repaid in less than 24 months); and   
#For a third or subsequent conviction, until the amount of the third or subsequent overpayment is repaid.   
#For a third or subsequent conviction, until the amount of the third or subsequent overpayment is repaid.   


There is some degree of ministerial discretion to waive the minimum $100 repayment requirements in a given benefit month. The minister may waive the repayment for the following reasons:  
There is some degree of ministerial discretion to waive the minimum $100 repayment requirements in a given benefit month. The minister may waive the repayment for the following reasons:  
*The minister is satisfied that the family unit is homeless or at risk of becoming homeless
*The minister is satisfied that the family unit is homeless or at risk of becoming homeless
*The minister is satisfied that a deduction would result in danger to the health of a person in the family unit; OR  
*The minister is satisfied that a deduction would result in danger to the health of a person in the family unit; OR  
Line 83: Line 83:
If a household provides inaccurate or incomplete information regarding eligibility (under s 10 or 11 of the EAA or EAPWDA), and as a result receives assistance for which it was not eligible, MSDSI may apply sanctions under s 15.1 of the EAA (s 14.1 of the EAPWDA) and ss 32-34 of the EAR (ss 28-30 of the EAPWDR).  
If a household provides inaccurate or incomplete information regarding eligibility (under s 10 or 11 of the EAA or EAPWDA), and as a result receives assistance for which it was not eligible, MSDSI may apply sanctions under s 15.1 of the EAA (s 14.1 of the EAPWDA) and ss 32-34 of the EAR (ss 28-30 of the EAPWDR).  


'''NOTE:''' The details of the sanctions that MSDSI may apply under s 15.1 of the EAA (s 14.1 of the EAPWDA) and ss 32-34 of the EAR (ss 28-30 of the EAPWDR) are summarized in the Ministry's Policy an Procedures Manual at http://wwwon  the Online Resource in a table as above: http://www.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/policies-ffor-government/bcea-policy-and-procedure-manual/eligibility/sanctions
'''NOTE:''' The details of the sanctions that MSDSI may apply under s 15.1 of the EAA (s 14.1 of the EAPWDA) and ss 32-34 of the EAR (ss 28-30 of the EAPWDR) are summarized in the Ministry's Policy an Procedures Manual at http://www on the Online Resource in a table as above: http://www.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/policies-ffor-government/bcea-policy-and-procedure-manual/eligibility/sanctions


== F. Outstanding Warrants ==
== F. Outstanding Warrants ==


Effective 1 June 2010, the legislation (EAA, s.\ 15.2 and EAPWDA, s 14.2) provides that where there is an outstanding warrant for a person under the ''Immigration and Refugee Protection Act'' or any other enactment of Canada in relation to an indictable offence, that person will be ineligible to receive income assistance, disability assistance, or hardship assistance.   Exceptions to these rules include people under 18, pregnant women, and people in the end stage of a terminal illness (see  the EAR, s 38.1 and EAPWDR, s 34.1 for details).  
Effective 1 June 2010, the legislation (EAA, s.\ 15.2 and EAPWDA, s 14.2) provides that where there is an outstanding warrant for a person under the ''Immigration and Refugee Protection Act'' or any other enactment of Canada in relation to an indictable offence, that person will be ineligible to receive income assistance, disability assistance, or hardship assistance. Exceptions to these rules include people under 18, pregnant women, and people in the end stage of a terminal illness (see  the EAR, s 38.1 and EAPWDR, s 34.1 for details).  


If MSDSI cuts off a person’s assistance due to an outstanding  warrant,  the  person  may appeal  the decision  by  requesting  reconsideration  by  MSDSI.  If  the  reconsideration  is  unsuccessful,  a  further appeal may be filed to the Employment and Assistance Appeal Tribunal (EAAT). While the appeal is in progress, the person should be able to collect a repayable appeal supplement.   
If MSDSI cuts off a person’s assistance due to an outstanding  warrant,  the  person  may appeal  the decision  by  requesting  reconsideration  by  MSDSI.  If  the  reconsideration  is  unsuccessful,  a  further appeal may be filed to the Employment and Assistance Appeal Tribunal (EAAT). While the appeal is in progress, the person should be able to collect a repayable appeal supplement.   


If a person is ineligible to collect assistance due to an outstanding warrant, he or  she may be able to collect two other forms of financial help:  
If a person is ineligible to collect assistance due to an outstanding warrant, he or  she may be able to collect two other forms of financial help:  

Navigation menu