Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3 bytes removed ,  08:44, 20 November 2019
Line 121: Line 121:     
* if the parties have “substantially equal” time with the children, the person who wants to move has to prove that the relocation is in the best interests of the children,
 
* if the parties have “substantially equal” time with the children, the person who wants to move has to prove that the relocation is in the best interests of the children,
* if the relocating party has the child for the “vast majority" of the children’s time,the person objecting to the move has to prove that the relocation is not in the best interests of the children lies,
+
* if the relocating party has the child for the “vast majority" of the children’s time, the person objecting to the move has to prove that the relocation is not in the best interests of the children lies,
 
* in cases falling in the mid-range between these extremes, both parties have the burden of proof.
 
* in cases falling in the mid-range between these extremes, both parties have the burden of proof.
  

Navigation menu