Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parenting after Separation"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and
 
Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and
 
Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada.</tt></blockquote>--[[User:Nate Russell|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell|talk]]) 10:44, 12 June 2013 (PDT)
 
Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada.</tt></blockquote>--[[User:Nate Russell|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell|talk]]) 10:44, 12 June 2013 (PDT)
 +
 +
 +
:Thanks, Nate - I think we need to update the page as outlined in JP's Blog.  I will email Justin and Ron and hopefully between the three of us, we can edit the page.  If we need help, we'll let you know.  Note: by edit page, I suspect that means Justin will edit....M--[[User:Mary Mouat|Mary Mouat]] ([[User talk:Mary Mouat|talk]]) 10:50, 12 June 2013 (PDT)
  
 
== This page needs a refresher ==
 
== This page needs a refresher ==
  
 
I haven't really reviewed this page in several years. But in rereading it now, it needs a bit of a refresher. I'm not suggesting major changes, but it should be read critically for content, flow and tone and edited as necessary. -- 18:15, May 19, 2013‎ [[Jpboyd]]
 
I haven't really reviewed this page in several years. But in rereading it now, it needs a bit of a refresher. I'm not suggesting major changes, but it should be read critically for content, flow and tone and edited as necessary. -- 18:15, May 19, 2013‎ [[Jpboyd]]

Revision as of 09:50, 12 June 2013

New sample parenting plans from DOJ[edit]

JP's blog from June 11 brings to light new resources from the Department of Justice's website dealing with parenting plans. They appears to be a checklist and even a recommended sample precedent (that starts here). The sample is awkwardly split up over a couple of webpages that you have to click "Next Page" to keep on reading. This information would be a good candidate to copy and paste into a single, downloadable PDF of Word Doc. The Canadian government expressly allows this provided on the following terms:

Users are required to:

Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and

Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada.

--Nate Russell (talk) 10:44, 12 June 2013 (PDT)


Thanks, Nate - I think we need to update the page as outlined in JP's Blog. I will email Justin and Ron and hopefully between the three of us, we can edit the page. If we need help, we'll let you know. Note: by edit page, I suspect that means Justin will edit....M--Mary Mouat (talk) 10:50, 12 June 2013 (PDT)

This page needs a refresher[edit]

I haven't really reviewed this page in several years. But in rereading it now, it needs a bit of a refresher. I'm not suggesting major changes, but it should be read critically for content, flow and tone and edited as necessary. -- 18:15, May 19, 2013‎ Jpboyd