Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Divorce (3:IV)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
78 bytes removed ,  05:12, 24 August 2023
no edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 10, 2022}}
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= July 12, 2023}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = family}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = family}}


Line 26: Line 26:
To obtain a divorce in a particular province, one of the parties to the claim must have been “ordinarily resident” in that province for at least one year immediately preceding the presentation of the Notice of Family Claim (''DA'', s 3(1)). A person can be “ordinarily resident” in a province and still travel or have casual or temporary residence outside the province.  
To obtain a divorce in a particular province, one of the parties to the claim must have been “ordinarily resident” in that province for at least one year immediately preceding the presentation of the Notice of Family Claim (''DA'', s 3(1)). A person can be “ordinarily resident” in a province and still travel or have casual or temporary residence outside the province.  


[http://www.parl.gc.ca/legisinfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=5387766&Language=E&Mode=1 ''An Act to Amend the Civil Marriage Act''] received Royal Assent and came into force on June 26, 2013. It allows non-resident couples married in Canada to divorce in Canada if they cannot get a divorce where they live.   
[http://www.parl.gc.ca/legisinfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=5387766&Language=E&Mode=1 ''An Act to Amend the Civil Marriage Act''] received Royal Assent and came into force on June 26, 2013. It allows non-resident couples married in Canada to divorce in Canada if they cannot get a divorce in their country of residence.   




There must not be another divorce proceeding involving the same parties in another jurisdiction. If two actions are pending and were commenced on different days (divorce, corollary relief or variation), the court in which a divorce proceeding was commenced first has exclusive jurisdiction unless the first proceeding is discontinued (DA s 3(2)). As of March 1, 2021 there is no requirement that the first proceeding be discontinued within a certain amount of time in order to instead move forward with the second proceeding.
There must not be another divorce proceeding involving the same parties in another jurisdiction. If two actions are pending and were commenced on different days (divorce, corollary relief or variation), the court in which a divorce proceeding was commenced first has exclusive jurisdiction unless the first proceeding is discontinued (DA s 3(2)). As of March 1, 2021 there is no requirement that the first proceeding be discontinued within a certain amount of time to instead move forward with the second proceeding.


If two proceedings were commenced on the same day, the parties have 40 days to discontinue one of such proceedings (divorce, corollary relief, or variation) (DA s 3(3), 4(3), 5(3)). If neither proceeding is discontinued within the allotted time, an application can be made by either or both of the parties to have the Federal Court determine which court retains jurisdiction by applying the following:
If two proceedings were commenced on the same day, the parties have 40 days to discontinue one of such proceedings (divorce, corollary relief, or variation) (DA s 3(3), 4(3), 5(3)). If neither proceeding is discontinued within the allotted time, an application can be made by either or both of the parties to have the Federal Court determine which court retains jurisdiction by applying the following:
Line 89: Line 89:
=== 2. Physical or Mental Cruelty: s 8(2)(b)(ii) ===
=== 2. Physical or Mental Cruelty: s 8(2)(b)(ii) ===


The test for cruelty is subjective. The question asked in a cruelty case is whether the conduct is of such a kind as to render intolerable the continued cohabitation of the spouses. There is no objective standard in the sense that certain conduct will constitute cruelty in every case while other conduct will not. The respondent’s conduct may constitute cruelty even if there is no intent to be cruel. What has to be determined is the effect of the conduct on a particular person, rather than the nature of the acts committed (''Burr v Burr'', [1983] BCJ No 743).  
The test for cruelty is subjective. The question asked in a cruelty case is whether the conduct is of such a kind as to render intolerable the continued cohabitation of the spouses. There is no objective standard in the sense that certain conduct will constitute cruelty in every case while other conduct will not. The respondent’s conduct may constitute cruelty even if there is no intent to be cruel. What must be determined is the effect of the conduct on a particular person, rather than the nature of the acts committed (''Burr v Burr'', [1983] BCJ No 743).  


If the spouses are still cohabiting, the Court will infer that the conduct was not intolerable unless the claimant had no means or opportunity for leaving (''Cridge v Cridge'' (1974), 12 RFL 57, (BCSC)). Lack of income, children at home, and difficulty with the English language may qualify as reasons for continuing cohabitation.  
If the spouses are still cohabiting, the Court will infer that the conduct was not intolerable unless the claimant had no means or opportunity for leaving (''Cridge v Cridge'' (1974), 12 RFL 57, (BCSC)). Lack of income, children at home, and difficulty with the English language may qualify as reasons for continuing cohabitation.  


Again, to make a case based on cruelty, there must be proof on the balance of probabilities. Things that could be entered as evidence in this area include medical evidence such as charts and doctors' statements.
Again, to make a case based on cruelty, there must be proof on the balance of probabilities. Things that could be entered as evidence in this area include medical evidence such as charts and doctors' statements.
Line 155: Line 155:
Each spouse must be aware of the potential influence of any agreement on future expectations, and the legal implications of the agreement on questions of ownership and title in family property. Each spouse should have independent legal advice, even in cases where the parties seem to be in agreement on the terms of a separation agreement. If a separation agreement has been signed and one party did not have independent legal advice this may go towards evidence of unfair contracting and it may be possible to overturn the contract.  
Each spouse must be aware of the potential influence of any agreement on future expectations, and the legal implications of the agreement on questions of ownership and title in family property. Each spouse should have independent legal advice, even in cases where the parties seem to be in agreement on the terms of a separation agreement. If a separation agreement has been signed and one party did not have independent legal advice this may go towards evidence of unfair contracting and it may be possible to overturn the contract.  


It is possible that a separation agreement containing provisions for support may be regarded by the Court as evidence of liability on the part of the supporting spouse. While the agreement does not usurp the Court’s jurisdiction in support, guardianship or parenting arrangements, the Court will consider the terms of the agreement when making the order. Whether the Court will uphold the terms of the agreement changes depending on the subject matter of the agreement. See sections of the ''FLA'' that apply to each subject matter. Note also that any orders respecting agreements are subject to s 214 of the ''FLA''.  
It is possible that a separation agreement containing provisions for support may be regarded by the Court as evidence of liability on the part of the supporting spouse. While the agreement does not usurp the Court’s jurisdiction in support, guardianship or parenting arrangements, the Court will consider the terms of the agreement when making the order. Whether the Court will uphold the terms of the agreement changes depending on the subject matter of the agreement. See sections of the ''FLA'' that apply to each subject matter. Note also that any orders respecting agreements are subject to s 214 of the ''FLA''.  


In addition to property settlements, guardianship or parenting arrangements, and support, the separation agreement may embrace any other matters the parties wish to include in it, and often includes estate provisions, releases, penalties for breach of the contract, etc. A  separation agreement can be more flexible than a Court order. For example, a Court order cannot contain contingent terms, but a separation agreement can.  
In addition to property settlements, guardianship or parenting arrangements, and support, the separation agreement may embrace any other matters the parties wish to include in it, and often includes estate provisions, releases, penalties for breach of the contract, etc. A  separation agreement can be more flexible than a Court order. For example, a Court order cannot contain contingent terms, but a separation agreement can.  
Line 179: Line 179:
=== 4. Support Order After Divorce Has Been Granted ===
=== 4. Support Order After Divorce Has Been Granted ===


Under s 15 of the current ''DA'', for the purposes of child support, “spouse” means either of two persons a male or female who are married to each other (s 2(1)) and also includes “former spouse”. This means that a former spouse may be able to get a support order after the divorce has been granted.  
Under s 2(1) of the current DA “spouse” means two persons who are currently married to each or were formerly married to one another. As such, a former spouse may be able to get a support order after the divorce has been granted. '''The amended DA has repealed s 15 and updated the definition of “spouse” under s 2(1) to reflect the sections under which the meaning of “spouse” is inclusive of “former spouse.” This change came into effect March 1, 2021.
 
'''
The amended ''DA'' has repealed s 15 and updated the definition of “spouse” under s 2(1) to reflect the sections under which the meaning of “spouse” is inclusive of “former spouse.” This change came into effect March 1, 2021.
 
=== 5. Mediation ===
=== 5. Mediation ===


A form of mediation for separating couples is provided by the Family Justice Counsellors of the Ministry of Attorney General. It is intended to steer people out of the Court system. Similar to the small claims process, if the two parties come to an agreement through mediation they may choose to sign a binding contract after the process. Should either party choose not to sign, the agreement will not be binding. There are offices throughout BC, which can be located using the blue pages of the telephone book under BC Corrections Branch, or Family Court: Probation and  Family Court Services. The service is confidential and free. Family Justice Counsellors cannot deal with property and debt division.   
A form of mediation for separating couples is provided by the Family Justice Counsellors of the Ministry of Attorney General. It is intended to steer people out of the Court system. Similar to the small claims process, if the two parties come to an agreement through mediation they may choose to sign a binding contract after the process. Should either party choose not to sign, the agreement will not be binding. There are offices throughout BC, which can be located using the blue pages of the telephone book under BC Corrections Branch, or Family Court: Probation and  Family Court Services. The service is confidential and free. Family Justice Counsellors cannot deal with property and debt division.   


There is also the Family Mediation Practicum Program which aims to provide affordable mediation services to participants while also offering practical training to new mediators (along with an experienced mentor mediator). See [[Governing Legislation and Resources for Family Law (3:II)#B. Resources on the Internet | II.B. Resources on the Internet]].  
There is also the Family Mediation Practicum Program which aims to provide affordable mediation services to participants while also offering practical training to new mediators (along with an experienced mentor mediator). See [[Governing Legislation and Resources for Family Law (3:II)#B. Resources on the Internet | II.B. Resources on the Internet]].  


Parties may wish to retain a private family law mediator to assist them in mediating a resolution to their family law matter. They may contact the British Columbia Mediator Roster Society for names of family law mediators. See [[Governing Legislation and Resources for Family Law (3:II)#B. Resources on the Internet | II.B. Resources on the Internet]]. Not all family law mediators are listed on the roster, and there are many family lawyers who are specifically trained and accredited in family law mediation.  
Parties may wish to retain a private family law mediator to assist them in mediating a resolution to their family law matter. They may contact the British Columbia Mediator Roster Society for names of family law mediators. See [[Governing Legislation and Resources for Family Law (3:II)#B. Resources on the Internet | II.B. Resources on the Internet]]. Not all family law mediators are listed on the roster, and there are many family lawyers who are specifically trained and accredited in family law mediation.  


The new ''FLA'' favours out of Court resolution of issues, and even gives courts the authority to refer parties to counselling and mediation (s 224 ''FLA''). It also formally recognizes the role of and duties of family dispute resolution professionals (Section 8), family justice counsellors (Section 10), and parenting coordinators (Part 2, Division 3).
The new ''FLA'' favours out of Court resolution of issues, and even gives courts the authority to refer parties to counselling and mediation (s 224 ''FLA''). It also formally recognizes the role of and duties of family dispute resolution professionals (Section 8), family justice counsellors (Section 10), and parenting coordinators (Part 2, Division 3).
Line 195: Line 193:
=== 6. Collaborative Divorce ===  
=== 6. Collaborative Divorce ===  


Another option for parties dealing with family law matters is the Collaborative Divorce Model. This offers an option for parties to resolve disputes respectfully and without going to Court. Parties work out a negotiated settlement with the help of collaboratively trained professionals including (as needed) lawyers, divorce coaches, child specialists and financial specialists. This allows the parties to negotiate a settlement without the threat of Court. If the parties are unable to resolve matters through the Collaborative process, the Collaborative professionals will not be involved in Court proceedings. See the websites listed in [[Governing Legislation and Resources for Family Law (3:II)#B. Resources on the Internet | II.B. Resources on the Internet]] for more information.
Another option for parties dealing with family law matters is the Collaborative Divorce Model. This offers an option for parties to resolve disputes respectfully and without going to Court. Parties work out a negotiated settlement with the help of collaboratively trained professionals including (as needed) lawyers, divorce coaches, child specialists and financial specialists. This allows the parties to negotiate a settlement without the threat of Court. If the parties are unable to resolve matters through the Collaborative process, the Collaborative professionals will not be involved in Court proceedings. See the websites listed in [[Governing Legislation and Resources for Family Law (3:II)#B. Resources on the Internet | II.B. Resources on the Internet]] for more information.


=== 7. Rule 7-1: Judicial Case Conferences ===  
=== 7. Rule 7-1: Judicial Case Conferences ===  
Line 219: Line 217:


There are many other procedural options available to parties in Family Law disputes. Section 8 of the ''FLA'' requires counsel and other  Family Dispute Resolution Professionals to discuss the advisability of the various types of family dispute resolution, which include those listed above as well as the following:  
There are many other procedural options available to parties in Family Law disputes. Section 8 of the ''FLA'' requires counsel and other  Family Dispute Resolution Professionals to discuss the advisability of the various types of family dispute resolution, which include those listed above as well as the following:  
* Family Law Arbitration. See http://family.legalaid.bc.ca/visit/arbitrators for more information
* Family Law Arbitration. For more information see https://family.legalaid.bc.ca/visit/arbitrators
* Med/Arb, which is a combination of both Mediation and Arbitration.  
* Med/Arb, which is a combination of both Mediation and Arbitration.  
* Judicial Settlement Conferences pursuant to Rule 7-2 of the ''Supreme Court Family Rules''
* Judicial Settlement Conferences pursuant to Rule 7-2 of the ''Supreme Court Family Rules''
Line 233: Line 231:
=== 2. Lawyers ===
=== 2. Lawyers ===


All lawyers will expect an initial payment from their client. The amount of the initial retainer will vary depending on the lawyer’s hourly rate and their estimation of the complexity of the case. The cost of a simple, uncontested divorce begins at approximately $1,000 and up. Advise clients to use the [http://www.cbabc.org/for-the-public/lawyer-referral-service Lawyer Referral Service] (604) 687-3221 or 1-800-663-1919. The first half-hour will only cost $25, with the lawyer charging their standard rate thereafter.  
All lawyers will expect an initial payment from their client. The amount of the initial retainer will vary depending on the lawyer’s hourly rate and their estimation of the complexity of the case. The cost of a simple and uncontested divorce begins at approximately $1,500 and up. We advise clients to use the Lawyer Referral Service (604) 687-3221 or 1-800-663-1919. The 15 minutes of the initial consultation with the lawyer are free and conducted over the phone, with the lawyer charging a fee after the 15 minutes have elapsed.


To minimize costs when retaining a lawyer, clients should be advised to:  
To minimize costs when retaining a lawyer, clients should be advised to:  
5,109

edits