5,109
edits
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Sections 7, 10, and 24 of the ''Charter'' have some measure of effect on arrest procedure, particularly in relation to the conduct of arresting officers and the admissibility of evidence (see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1988/1988canlii44/1988canlii44.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQALciB2IHN0ZXZlbnMAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=2 R v Stevens]'', [1988] 1 SCR 1153). There is also well-developed case law on arrest procedure. See ''Christie v Leachinsky'', [1947] AC 573 (HL) and section 29 of the ''Criminal Code''. | Sections 7, 10, and 24 of the ''Charter'' have some measure of effect on arrest procedure, particularly in relation to the conduct of arresting officers and the admissibility of evidence (see ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1988/1988canlii44/1988canlii44.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQALciB2IHN0ZXZlbnMAAAAAAQ&resultIndex=2 R v Stevens]'', [1988] 1 SCR 1153). There is also well-developed case law on arrest procedure. See ''Christie v Leachinsky'', [1947] AC 573 (HL) and section 29 of the ''Criminal Code''. | ||
edits