Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Changing Family Law Orders, Awards and Agreements Involving Spousal Support"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{OKSUBSTANTIVE}}
{{OKCOPY}}
{{JP Boyd on Family Law TOC|expanded = spousalsupport}}
{{JP Boyd on Family Law TOC|expanded = spousalsupport}}


Line 6: Line 6:
This page talks about changing interim orders and final orders for spousal support, changing orders that were made in a different jurisdiction and changing agreements for spousal support.
This page talks about changing interim orders and final orders for spousal support, changing orders that were made in a different jurisdiction and changing agreements for spousal support.


==Changing Interim Orders for Spousal Support==
==Changing interim orders for spousal support==


An ''interim order'' is a kind of temporary order that is made after a court proceeding has started but before the proceeding is finally resolved by a trial or settlement. Changing an order is called ''varying'' an order.
An ''interim order'' is a kind of temporary order that is made after a court proceeding has started but before the proceeding is finally resolved by a trial or settlement. Changing an order is called ''varying'' an order.


The Court of Appeal has said that interim orders for spousal support are intended to be temporary, rough-and-ready decisions intended only to tide the parties over until a final order is made, rather than an exhaustive review of the merits of a claim for spousal support. As such, the courts often prefer to allow interim orders to stand when someone wants to change them, and someone asking to vary an interim order cannot expect to just walk into court and have the issue heard again; there must be a good reason why a change in the interim order is required. In the 1999 case ''Hama v. Werbes'', the Supreme Court said that interim order should only be varied when:
The Court of Appeal has said that interim orders for spousal support are intended to be temporary, rough-and-ready decisions intended only to tide the parties over until a final order is made, rather than an exhaustive review of the merits of a claim for spousal support. As such, the courts often prefer to allow interim orders to stand when someone wants to change them, and someone asking to vary an interim order cannot expect to just walk into court and have the issue heard again; there must be a good reason why a change in the interim order is required. In the 1999 case ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1d1rl Hama v. Werbes]'', 1999 CanLII 5828 (BCSC), the Supreme Court said that interim order should only be varied when:


<blockquote>"there is a compelling change in circumstances, such that one or both of the parties would be seriously prejudiced by waiting until trial."</blockquote>
<blockquote>"there is a compelling change in circumstances, such that one or both of the parties would be seriously prejudiced by waiting until trial."</blockquote>
Line 16: Line 16:
This "compelling change" in circumstances must be serious and of such importance that one or both of the parties will be severely disadvantaged unless the matter is addressed immediately. From the point of view of the spouse receiving support, the ''recipient'', a compelling change in circumstances might be:
This "compelling change" in circumstances must be serious and of such importance that one or both of the parties will be severely disadvantaged unless the matter is addressed immediately. From the point of view of the spouse receiving support, the ''recipient'', a compelling change in circumstances might be:


#a loss of supplementary income, such as employment income or WCB benefits, without which the recipient cannot support him- or herself on the amount of spousal support presently being paid;
*a loss of supplementary income, such as employment income or WCB benefits, without which the recipient cannot support him- or herself on the amount of spousal support presently being paid,
#an unexpected increase in expenses, such that the amount of spousal support being paid becomes inadequate; or,
*an unexpected increase in expenses, such that the amount of spousal support being paid becomes inadequate, or
#an unexpected increase in child care obligations, because of, for example, the extended illness of a child or the birth of a new child, such that the spousal support paid is no longer adequate.
*an unexpected increase in child care obligations, because of, for example, the extended illness of a child or the birth of a new child, such that the spousal support paid is no longer adequate.


From the point of view of the spouse paying support, the ''payor'', a compelling change might be:
From the point of view of the spouse paying support, the ''payor'', a compelling change might be:


#a loss of income, or an unexpected but long-lasting drop in income, such that he or she can no longer afford to make the spousal support payments; or,
*a loss of income, or an unexpected but long-lasting drop in income, such that he or she can no longer afford to make the spousal support payments, or
#an unexpected increase in the payor's child care or child support obligations, such that his or her disposable income has decreased and the spousal support payments cannot be maintained.
*an unexpected increase in the payor's child care or child support obligations, such that his or her disposable income has decreased and the spousal support payments cannot be maintained.


If the court agrees and varies the interim order, the new order will also be an interim order and will remain in effect until the issue of spousal support is determined by a final order following trial or a settlement, or until it is varied by another interim order.
If the court agrees and varies the interim order, the new order will also be an interim order and will remain in effect until the issue of spousal support is determined by a final order following trial or a settlement, or until it is varied by another interim order.


===The ''Divorce Act''===
===The ''[[Divorce Act]]''===


Interim spousal support can be awarded under s. 15.2(2) of the federal ''Divorce Act''. Section 17(4.1) of the act allows the court to vary these orders if there gas been:
Interim spousal support can be awarded under s. 15.2(2) of the federal ''Divorce Act''. Section 17(4.1) of the act allows the court to vary these orders if there gas been:
Line 33: Line 33:
<blockquote><tt>... a change in the condition, means, needs or other circumstances of either former spouse has occurred since the making of the spousal support order or the last variation order made in respect of that order, and, in making the variation order, the court shall take that change into consideration.</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>... a change in the condition, means, needs or other circumstances of either former spouse has occurred since the making of the spousal support order or the last variation order made in respect of that order, and, in making the variation order, the court shall take that change into consideration.</tt></blockquote>


Only the Supreme Court can make or vary orders under the ''Divorce Act'', and the act only applies to people who are or were married to each other. Applications to vary interim orders are brought by filing a court form called a ''Notice of Application'', and the process for making interim applications is described in the ________ page.
Only the Supreme Court can make or vary orders under the ''Divorce Act'', and the act only applies to people who are or were married to each other. Applications to vary interim orders are brought by filing a court form called a ''Notice of Application'', and the process for making interim applications is described in the page called [How Do I Make an Interim Application in the Supreme Court?].


===The ''Family Law Act''===
===The ''[[Family Law Act]]''===


Spousal support can be awarded under s. 165 of the provincial ''Family Law Act''. Section 216(1) of the act allows the court to make interim orders for spousal support, and, under s. 216(3) allows the court to vary such orders:
Spousal support can be awarded under s. 165 of the provincial ''Family Law Act''. Section 216(1) of the act allows the court to make interim orders for spousal support, and, under s. 216(3) allows the court to vary such orders:
Line 53: Line 53:
Interim orders for spousal support under the ''Family Law Act'' can be made and varied by both the Provincial Court and the Supreme Court. Only the Provincial Court may vary Provincial Court orders and only the Supreme Court may vary Supreme Court orders.
Interim orders for spousal support under the ''Family Law Act'' can be made and varied by both the Provincial Court and the Supreme Court. Only the Provincial Court may vary Provincial Court orders and only the Supreme Court may vary Supreme Court orders.


Applications to vary Provincial Court orders are made by filing a court form called a ''Notice of Motion''. Supreme Court orders are varied by filing a ''Notice of Application''. The process for making interim applications is described in the ________ page.
Applications to vary Provincial Court orders are made by filing a court form called a ''Notice of Motion''. Supreme Court orders are varied by filing a ''Notice of Application''. The process for making interim applications is described in the page called [How Do I Make an Interim Application in the Provincial Court?].


==Changing Final Orders for Spousal Support==
==Changing final orders for spousal support==


A final order for spousal support is an order made following the trial of a court proceeding or made by the agreement of the parties as a settlement of the proceeding. Changing an order is called ''varying'' an order.
A final order for spousal support is an order made following the trial of a court proceeding or made by the agreement of the parties as a settlement of the proceeding. Changing an order is called ''varying'' an order.
Line 61: Line 61:
In general, a final order is just that, ''final''. Without an appeal, a final order represents the end of a court proceeding and cannot be changed. This rule is applied a little less strictly in family law proceedings, and someone who wants to vary a final order for spousal support must be able to show that there has been a serious change in circumstances since the final order was made.
In general, a final order is just that, ''final''. Without an appeal, a final order represents the end of a court proceeding and cannot be changed. This rule is applied a little less strictly in family law proceedings, and someone who wants to vary a final order for spousal support must be able to show that there has been a serious change in circumstances since the final order was made.


===Changing an Order Refusing Support===
===Changing an order refusing support===


It used to be the case that a claim for spousal support which was rejected in a final judgment was permanently dismissed, such that any future application for support could not proceed, no matter how things might have changed for someone in financial need.
It used to be the case that a claim for spousal support which was rejected in a final judgment was permanently dismissed, such that any future application for support could not proceed, no matter how things might have changed for someone in financial need.


A 2002 case from the Court of Appeal, ''Gill-Sager v. Sager'', called into question just how "final" final orders about spousal support should be. In this case, the court issued a strong caution to trial judges against permanently dismissing a spouse's claim for support. Subsequent cases have interpreted this decision to mean that spousal support claims should never be permanently dismissed, only ''adjourned'', so that it will always be open to a spouse to apply for spousal support later on even if the spouse wasn't awarded spousal support at trial
A 2003 case from the Court of Appeal, ''[http://canlii.ca/t/5cdj Gill-Sager v. Sager]'', 2003 BCCA 46, called into question just how "final" final orders about spousal support should be. In this case, the court issued a strong caution to trial judges against permanently dismissing a spouse's claim for support. Subsequent cases have interpreted this decision to mean that spousal support claims should never be permanently dismissed, only ''adjourned'', so that it will always be open to a spouse to apply for spousal support later on even if the spouse wasn't awarded spousal support at trial


In practice this means that a final order should not say that a claim for support is ''dismissed'' but is only ''adjourned generally''.
In practice this means that a final order should not say that a claim for support is ''dismissed'' but is only ''adjourned generally''.


===Changing an Order Granting Support===
===Changing an order granting support===


When a party seeks to vary a final order for spousal support, he or she must show that there has been a ''material change'' in circumstances affecting one or both of the parties. A material change is a significant change. In the 1996 case of ''T. (T.L.A.) v. T. (W.W.)'', the Court of Appeal said that a material change is one which is "substantial, unforeseen and of a continuing nature." In the 1995 case of ''G. (L.) v. B. (G.)'', the Supreme Court of Canada said that a material change is one which, if known at the time of the original order, would have resulted in a different order being made.
When a party seeks to vary a final order for spousal support, he or she must show that there has been a ''material change'' in circumstances affecting one or both of the parties. A material change is a significant change. In the 1996 case of ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1f0dj T. (T.L.A.) v. T. (W.W.)]'', 1996 CanLII 1190 (BCCA), the Court of Appeal said that a material change is one which is "substantial, unforeseen and of a continuing nature." In the 1995 case of ''G. (L.) v. B. (G.)'', the Supreme Court of Canada said that a material change is one which, if known at the time of the original order, would have resulted in a different order being made.


Section 17(4.1) of the ''Divorce Act'' says this on the subject:
Section 17(4.1) of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' says this on the subject:


<blockquote><tt>Before the court makes a variation order in respect of a spousal support order, the court shall satisfy itself that a change in the condition, means, needs or other circumstances of either former spouse has occurred since the making of the spousal support order or the last variation order made in respect of that order, and, in making the variation order, the court shall take that change into consideration.</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>Before the court makes a variation order in respect of a spousal support order, the court shall satisfy itself that a change in the condition, means, needs or other circumstances of either former spouse has occurred since the making of the spousal support order or the last variation order made in respect of that order, and, in making the variation order, the court shall take that change into consideration.</tt></blockquote>


Section 167 of the ''Family Law Act'' says this:
Section 167 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' says this:


<blockquote><tt>(1) On application, a court may change, suspend or terminate an order respecting spousal support, and may do so prospectively or retroactively.</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>(1) On application, a court may change, suspend or terminate an order respecting spousal support, and may do so prospectively or retroactively.</tt></blockquote>
Line 87: Line 87:
Although both the ''Divorce Act'' and the ''Family Law Act'' agree that a change in the "condition, means, needs or other circumstances" of a spouse is required, the ''Family Law Act'' provides two additional factors that would allow the court to change an order, when new evidence or proof of a lack of property disclosure is discovered after the last hearing.
Although both the ''Divorce Act'' and the ''Family Law Act'' agree that a change in the "condition, means, needs or other circumstances" of a spouse is required, the ''Family Law Act'' provides two additional factors that would allow the court to change an order, when new evidence or proof of a lack of property disclosure is discovered after the last hearing.


====Changing Reviewable Orders for Support====
====Changing reviewable orders for support====


''Reviewable order'' for spousal support are orders that impose an obligation to pay spousal support, but allow the order to be reassessed every now and then. Reviewable orders will say something like this:
''Reviewable order'' for spousal support are orders that impose an obligation to pay spousal support, but allow the order to be reassessed every now and then. Reviewable orders will say something like this:
Line 97: Line 97:
A review of spousal support can be handled through negotiation, collaborative settlement processes, mediation, arbitration or in court. If the one of the parties applies to court for the review, the court will hear the matter ''de novo'', a fresh hearing as if the question of spousal support was being determined for the first time. There is no need to establish a change in circumstances at a review hearing.  
A review of spousal support can be handled through negotiation, collaborative settlement processes, mediation, arbitration or in court. If the one of the parties applies to court for the review, the court will hear the matter ''de novo'', a fresh hearing as if the question of spousal support was being determined for the first time. There is no need to establish a change in circumstances at a review hearing.  


====Changing Consent Orders for Support====
====Changing consent orders for support====


A ''consent order'' is an order that the parties agree the court should make. As such, consent orders have a different status than orders that were argued about, since there is a strong presumption that the parties to the order knew what they were doing when they agreed to the terms of the order, and knew what their circumstances were at the time of the order and what they were likely to be in the future.
A ''consent order'' is an order that the parties agree the court should make. As such, consent orders have a different status than orders that were argued about, since there is a strong presumption that the parties to the order knew what they were doing when they agreed to the terms of the order, and knew what their circumstances were at the time of the order and what they were likely to be in the future.


The test for changing consent orders for spousal support used to be the "material change" test, referred to above. The question was "has there been a material change in the means and needs connected to the marriage of either spouse that, if known of at the time of the original order, would have resulted in a different order being made?" In the 2003 case of ''Miglin v. Miglin'', the Supreme Court of Canada decided that the material change test shouldn't apply to changing agreements and consent for support and described a three-step test to be used when deciding whether a change is warranted:
The test for changing consent orders for spousal support used to be the "material change" test, referred to above. The question was "has there been a material change in the means and needs connected to the marriage of either spouse that, if known of at the time of the original order, would have resulted in a different order being made?" In the 2003 case of ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1g5lh Miglin v. Miglin]'', 2003 SCC 24, the Supreme Court of Canada decided that the material change test shouldn't apply to changing agreements and consent for support and described a three-step test to be used when deciding whether a change is warranted:


*Was the order negotiated and entered into fairly, that is, was there an equality of bargaining power?
*Was the order negotiated and entered into fairly, that is, was there an equality of bargaining power?
Line 109: Line 109:
In other words, a court asked to change a consent order for spousal support should first look at the circumstances under which the order was made. Was a party at an unfair advantage? Was a party pressured into agreeing to the order? Secondly, the court should consider whether the order met the criteria for spousal support set out in the ''Divorce Act''. Thirdly, if the order passes the first two parts of the test, the court should look at whether the order continues to reflect the parties' intentions at the time the order was made, and whether the order continues to meet the criteria set out in the act.
In other words, a court asked to change a consent order for spousal support should first look at the circumstances under which the order was made. Was a party at an unfair advantage? Was a party pressured into agreeing to the order? Secondly, the court should consider whether the order met the criteria for spousal support set out in the ''Divorce Act''. Thirdly, if the order passes the first two parts of the test, the court should look at whether the order continues to reflect the parties' intentions at the time the order was made, and whether the order continues to meet the criteria set out in the act.


==Orders Made Outside of British Columbia==
==Orders made outside of British Columbia==


It is not always very easy to change an order that was made outside the province because the courts of our province give a great deal of respect to the judgment of court that made the original order. There a bunch of other reasons why it can be hard to change an order made outside of British Columbia, but that's the meat of it.
It is not always very easy to change an order that was made outside the province because the courts of our province give a great deal of respect to the judgment of court that made the original order. There a bunch of other reasons why it can be hard to change an order made outside of British Columbia, but that's the meat of it.
Line 119: Line 119:
Orders that were made elsewhere in Canada under the federal ''Divorce Act'' can be changed here under s. 5 of the act, as long as both parties live in British Columbia. Where one party still lives in the province whose courts made the original order, a party living in BC can apply to change the original order using a process described in ss. 18 and 19 of the act:
Orders that were made elsewhere in Canada under the federal ''Divorce Act'' can be changed here under s. 5 of the act, as long as both parties live in British Columbia. Where one party still lives in the province whose courts made the original order, a party living in BC can apply to change the original order using a process described in ss. 18 and 19 of the act:


#the person making the application, the ''Applicant'', applies here for a ''provisional'' order changing the original order;
#the person making the application, the ''Applicant'', applies here for a ''provisional'' order changing the original order,
#the court sends the provisional order to the court that made the original order; and,
#the court sends the provisional order to the court that made the original order, and
#on notice to the other party, the original court holds a hearing to ''confirm'' the provisional order.
#on notice to the other party, the original court holds a hearing to ''confirm'' the provisional order.


This process requires two hearings: one here in British Columbia for a provisional order, and a second in the original court to confirm that order. The court in the other province may or may not confirm the provisional order, and may choose to send the order back to BC for more information. Until the provisional order is confirmed, it has no effect and the original order will continue to be the operative order.
This process requires two hearings: one here in British Columbia for a provisional order, and a second in the original court to confirm that order. The court in the other province may or may not confirm the provisional order, and may choose to send the order back to BC for more information. Until the provisional order is confirmed, it has no effect and the original order will continue to be the operative order.


===Other Orders===
===Other orders===


Orders that were made elsewhere in Canada under provincial family law legislation, or were made in certain countries other than Canada, can be changed by someone living in British Columbia using the provincial ''Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act''. Governments that have agreed to follow this process under the ''Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act'' are called ''reciprocating jurisdictions''.
Orders that were made elsewhere in Canada under provincial family law legislation, or were made in certain countries other than Canada, can be changed by someone living in British Columbia using the provincial ''[http://canlii.ca/t/84l3 Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act]''. Governments that have agreed to follow this process under the ''Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act'' are called ''reciprocating jurisdictions''.


The countries that will cooperate with a proceeding under the ''Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act'' are: South Africa, Zimbabe, Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Gibraltar, Norway, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, New Zealand and Barbados.
The countries that will cooperate with a proceeding under the ''Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act'' are: South Africa, Zimbabe, Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Gibraltar, Norway, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, Fiji, Papua New Guinea, New Zealand and Barbados.
Line 133: Line 133:
The process under this act is as follows:
The process under this act is as follows:


#the Applicant completes a bunch of forms provided by the provincial Reciprocals Office;
#the Applicant completes a bunch of forms provided by the provincial Reciprocals Office,
#our Reciprocals Office sends the forms to the court that made the original order; and,
#our Reciprocals Office sends the forms to the court that made the original order, and
#on notice of the other party, the original court holds a hearing on the applicant's application and may make an order varying the original order.
#on notice of the other party, the original court holds a hearing on the applicant's application and may make an order varying the original order.


Line 145: Line 145:
To vary an order of a country that does not participate in ''Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act'' applications, you will have to apply to vary the order in that country.
To vary an order of a country that does not participate in ''Interjurisdictional Support Orders Act'' applications, you will have to apply to vary the order in that country.


==Changing Agreements for Spousal Support==
==Changing agreements for spousal support==


People can reach an agreement that spousal support will or will not be paid, without having to go to court. Usually a deal on spousal support is worked out in a separation agreement, but marriage agreements and cohabitation agreements can also talk about whether support will be payable when a relationship ends. Family law agreements are discussed in more detail in the _________ chapter.
People can reach an agreement that spousal support will or will not be paid, without having to go to court. Usually a deal on spousal support is worked out in a separation agreement, but marriage agreements and cohabitation agreements can also talk about whether support will be payable when a relationship ends. Family law agreements are discussed in more detail in the [[Family Law Agreements]] chapter.


===Family Law Agreements and Contract Law===
===Family law agreements and contract law===


Family law agreements are private contracts reached between two people. While family law agreements can be attacked and enforced on the principles of contract law, the support provisions of an agreement can also be argued under the ''Divorce Act''. This is because a couple's private agreement on spousal support doesn't oust the authority of the court to make an order for support under the ''Divorce Act''.
Family law agreements are private contracts reached between two people. While family law agreements can be attacked and enforced on the principles of contract law, the support provisions of an agreement can also be argued under the ''Divorce Act''. This is because a couple's private agreement on spousal support doesn't oust the authority of the court to make an order for support under the ''Divorce Act''.
Line 157: Line 157:
Because of the importance the court will usually give to an agreement, it can sometimes be necessary to attack the agreement itself under the law that applies to contacts. An agreement might be found to be invalid for one or more of the following reasons:
Because of the importance the court will usually give to an agreement, it can sometimes be necessary to attack the agreement itself under the law that applies to contacts. An agreement might be found to be invalid for one or more of the following reasons:


#one of the parties was forced to enter into the agreement;
*one of the parties was forced to enter into the agreement,
#one party was too much under the influence or control of the other party in consenting to the terms of the agreement;
*one party was too much under the influence or control of the other party in consenting to the terms of the agreement,
#the agreement is fundamentally unfair; or,
*the agreement is fundamentally unfair, or
#one party lied to the other party or hid information from that party, and these misleading representations were the basis on which the agreement was executed.
*one party lied to the other party or hid information from that party, and these misleading representations were the basis on which the agreement was executed.


All of these arguments are based on the law of contracts, not on a particular piece of legislation.  
All of these arguments are based on the law of contracts, not on a particular piece of legislation.  
Line 166: Line 166:
If the court sets aside an agreement for spousal support, the person asking for support must convince the court that it should make an order for spousal support, under s. 15.2 of the ''Divorce Act'' or s. 165 of the ''Family Law Act''. This application will be treated in the same way that all other applications for support are treated.  
If the court sets aside an agreement for spousal support, the person asking for support must convince the court that it should make an order for spousal support, under s. 15.2 of the ''Divorce Act'' or s. 165 of the ''Family Law Act''. This application will be treated in the same way that all other applications for support are treated.  


===Agreements for Spousal Support and the ''Family Law Act''===
===Agreements for spousal support and the ''Family Law Act''===


The ''Family Law Act'' provides some important rules about agreements dealing with spousal support. First, under s. 165(3), the court cannot make an order for spousal support if there is an agreement on spousal support, including an agreement that support not be paid, until the agreement is set aside. Second, under s. 164, two tests are set out to help the court decide when an agreement on spousal support should be set.
The ''Family Law Act'' provides some important rules about agreements dealing with spousal support. First, under s. 165(3), the court cannot make an order for spousal support if there is an agreement on spousal support, including an agreement that support not be paid, until the agreement is set aside. Second, under s. 164, two tests are set out to help the court decide when an agreement on spousal support should be set.
Line 191: Line 191:
If the court sets aside an agreement for spousal support, the person asking for support must convince the court that it should make an order for spousal support, under s. 165 of the ''Family Law Act''. This application will be treated in the same way that all other applications for support are treated.
If the court sets aside an agreement for spousal support, the person asking for support must convince the court that it should make an order for spousal support, under s. 165 of the ''Family Law Act''. This application will be treated in the same way that all other applications for support are treated.


===Amending the Agreement===
===Amending the agreement===


It may be possible to avoid court altogether if the spouses can agree about the new arrangemetns and are willing to change the part of the agreement which deals with spousal support. All things considered, this is a much cheaper and much less confrontational way of dealing with the problem. It may well be that the payor is willing to agree to continue or start paying support, or that recipient is willing to agree to a reduction in the amount of support paid.
It may be possible to avoid court altogether if the spouses can agree about the new arrangemetns and are willing to change the part of the agreement which deals with spousal support. All things considered, this is a much cheaper and much less confrontational way of dealing with the problem. It may well be that the payor is willing to agree to continue or start paying support, or that recipient is willing to agree to a reduction in the amount of support paid.
Line 202: Line 202:
An amending agreement can also:
An amending agreement can also:


#reduce the amount someone must pay as spousal support;
*reduce the amount someone must pay as spousal support,
#increase the amount payable as spousal support; or,
*increase the amount payable as spousal support, or
#impose a new obligation to pay support.
*impose a new obligation to pay support.


==Further Reading in this Chapter==
==Further Reading in this Chapter==