View source for Talk:Introduction to JP Boyd on Family Law


I have written a brief introduction.  Also added a sentence or two to the existing copy in the following paragraph. I focus on JP rather than on the "team" because the great strength of this material is the feeling you get of an individual voice. See what you think.


A few challenges:

1. '''Chapters headings doubling as section headings'''. 

I strongly recommend adding a sub-heading, Overview, to the start of each chapter (following the chapter's introduction). 

Here is my thinking about this:

In the copy I'm editing, the chapter heading is also de facto the heading of the overview section. This is followed by "more detailed" sections. Logically this bothers me. It should be (a) heading; (b) section/section/section. And in the in-print TOC it will need to look like this.  

The problem then becomes a style sheet headache, where each section (aka page) starts with an (a) heading, even though subsequent sections are actually (b) section headings. In an online non-book format, I'd take a heading page, put in the intro, then line up the sections for folks to link to: overview section/more detailed section/more detailed section. (The heading for the overview section could just say "overview."


2. '''Names of chapters'''. For some chapters, there is a short title (in the TOC that you can see on the right) and a longer title when you arrive at the destination. This creates uncertainty when you link internally (am I in the right place?) Ideally, both for online and print, the name of the chapter heading should be '''exactly''' as it appears in '''any''' direction to it. Otherwise readers will feeling anxious. Right now the readers are looking at the short title in the brief TOC on the right, but when the reader is being '''linked''' in the text the long title is used.  It has to be consistent, not puzzling. (I don't care if long or short titles are used, but only one title would be a grand idea.)
 

3. '''In-print TOC'''. We are having a nice numbered manual, right?


4. The links to sections (and to forms) are sometimes different from the sections you can see on the short TOC. They are consistent when you get there. (This again is a short TOC issue rather than a linking issues.)