Talk:Children and Parenting after Separation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Gayla Reid (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) m (Nate Russell moved page Talk:Children in Family Law Matters to Talk:Children and Parenting after Separation: new title for edition 2020) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am sure it's correct to have the ''Charlton'' model using italics for ''Charlton'', but it | I am sure it's correct to have the ''Charlton'' model using italics for ''Charlton'', but it could be a distracting puzzle for the reader. I have moved it to roman. | ||
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 19:24, 30 April 2013 (PDT) | [[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 19:24, 30 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
: It may also be worth including the new Melnick form of the Joyce clause from the case JP was cited in. [[User:Rebecca Slaven|Rebecca Slaven]] ([[User talk:Rebecca Slaven|talk]]) 10:48, 23 May 2013 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:54, 5 August 2022
I am sure it's correct to have the Charlton model using italics for Charlton, but it could be a distracting puzzle for the reader. I have moved it to roman.
Gayla Reid (talk) 19:24, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
- It may also be worth including the new Melnick form of the Joyce clause from the case JP was cited in. Rebecca Slaven (talk) 10:48, 23 May 2013 (PDT)