Talk:Supreme Court Forms (Family Law): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Gayla Reid (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Format issues: Big gap between intro and information at the moment . . .") |
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Title: why not '''get rid''' of that (Family law) in the title and use the title '''Supreme Court: Forms and Examples'''? | |||
Format issues: Big gap between intro and information at the moment . . . | Format issues: Big gap between intro and information at the moment . . . | ||
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 20:10, 30 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
:We have left (Family Law) in the title because it disambiguates form pages for family versus other areas of law that a Clicklaw Wikibook may cover. We do not plan to deal with forms other than for family law, so we cannot tie up a general page for forms with specific information only applicable to family law users.--[[User:Nate Russell|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell|talk]]) 15:31, 17 June 2013 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 22:31, 17 June 2013
Title: why not get rid of that (Family law) in the title and use the title Supreme Court: Forms and Examples?
Format issues: Big gap between intro and information at the moment . . .
Gayla Reid (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
- We have left (Family Law) in the title because it disambiguates form pages for family versus other areas of law that a Clicklaw Wikibook may cover. We do not plan to deal with forms other than for family law, so we cannot tie up a general page for forms with specific information only applicable to family law users.--Nate Russell (talk) 15:31, 17 June 2013 (PDT)