Talk:Family Violence: Difference between revisions

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==New DOJ resources for child protection==
Does one of the editors want to check and then described and/or add this new [http://canada.justice.gc.ca/eng/fl-df/parent/pc-pe.html DOJ resource] somewhere on this page? --[[User:Nate Russell|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell|talk]]) 17:16, 25 June 2013 (PDT)


==Resources==
==Resources==
Line 15: Line 17:
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)


==Focus==
== Subject matter expert ==


This is outside the realm of copy editing, but I found it strange that a chapter on Family Violence would start off with a discussion of tort law. . .  If I was doing a substantive edit, I would move up the call the police, call VictimLink to be the lead items, and go on from there. The website has a how-to focus rather than a learning focus, and is for people who are dealing with the issue under discussion (and their intermediaries).
The portion about child protection could use a review by someone expert in the subject.
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
[[User:Jpboyd|JP Boyd]] ([[User talk:Jpboyd|talk]]) 22:19, 20 May 2013 (PDT)
 
==Section on Drawbacks of tort claims==
In 3.1, the '''Drawbacks of tort claims''' there is a sentence in para 3 that begins, '''Lawyers who practise family law''' . . .  Is this in context here?
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 16:41, 5 May 2013 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 00:16, 26 June 2013

New DOJ resources for child protection[edit]

Does one of the editors want to check and then described and/or add this new DOJ resource somewhere on this page? --Nate Russell (talk) 17:16, 25 June 2013 (PDT)

Resources[edit]

I have added some resources - I am afraid that the generic lists of resources at the bottom of this section may not get readers to core publications. . . and that would be a shame.

1. Re calling police if you have suffered abuse, I added a reference to two LSS resources.

2. Re contacting groups like Battered Women's Support Services - these days the go-to is VictimLink. I added a paragraph about that - it's standard VictimLink language.

3. At the end of the part on protection orders, I included a reference to the booklet, For Your Protection. (main ministry/lss book on the topic)

4. At the end of child protection (end of copy) I made reference to an LSS publication, Parents' Rights, Kids' Rights.

6. In terms of Resources and links, I took out the Dial-a-Law Dating Violence script (not relevant) and added the LSS family law website stuff on child protection. But the text does not seem to be fitting inside the text box - you can see the problem in View. (I hunted about to try to solve this but could not.) Gayla Reid (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

Subject matter expert[edit]

The portion about child protection could use a review by someone expert in the subject. JP Boyd (talk) 22:19, 20 May 2013 (PDT)