Talk:Children and Parenting after Separation: Difference between revisions

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "GR: I'm sure there is a good reason why the ''Charlton'' model uses italics for ''Charlton'', but it would be a complete mystery to the reader. I have moved it to roman.")
 
m (Nate Russell moved page Talk:Children in Family Law Matters to Talk:Children and Parenting after Separation: new title for edition 2020)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
GR: I'm sure there is a good reason why the ''Charlton'' model uses italics for ''Charlton'', but it would be a complete mystery to the reader. I have moved it to roman.
I am sure it's correct to have the ''Charlton'' model using italics for ''Charlton'', but it could be a distracting puzzle for the reader. I have moved it to roman.
 
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 19:24, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
: It may also be worth including the new Melnick form of the Joyce clause from the case JP was cited in. [[User:Rebecca Slaven|Rebecca Slaven]] ([[User talk:Rebecca Slaven|talk]]) 10:48, 23 May 2013 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 17:54, 5 August 2022

I am sure it's correct to have the Charlton model using italics for Charlton, but it could be a distracting puzzle for the reader. I have moved it to roman.

Gayla Reid (talk) 19:24, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

It may also be worth including the new Melnick form of the Joyce clause from the case JP was cited in. Rebecca Slaven (talk) 10:48, 23 May 2013 (PDT)

(1) In law, a court proceeding; a lawsuit; an action; a cause of action; a claim. (2) A historic decision of the court; case law. See "action," "case law, " "court proceeding," and "precedent."

Retrieved from "https://wiki.clicklaw.bc.ca/index.php?title=Talk:Children_and_Parenting_after_Separation&oldid=52530"