Talk:Understanding the Legal System for Family Law Matters: Difference between revisions
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) (Created page with " == Use Discussion Pages like this one for editorial side-talk == It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ...") |
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) m (Nate Russell moved page Talk:Introduction to the Legal System for Family Matters to Talk:Understanding the Legal System for Family Law Matters: From staging May 2022) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Use Discussion Pages like this one for editorial side-talk == | == Use Discussion Pages like this one for editorial side-talk == | ||
It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ideas for a given article, rather than place comments in the content of articles directly. We will see a lower incident of editorial notes being left to confuse readers if we take to this convention now | It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ideas for a given article, rather than place comments in the content of articles directly. We will see a lower incident of editorial notes being left to confuse readers if we take to this convention now [[User:Nate|Nate]] ([[User talk:Nate|talk]]) 17:49, 18 February 2013 (MST) | ||
: One more thing. Be vigilant about signing your entries on the Discussion page with four tilde marks. [[User:Nate Russell|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell|talk]]) 16:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
==Formatting of first paragraph - an issue throughout== | |||
Somewhat odd space before the first para here. You might want to check formatting. | |||
To my eye, we'd want the first para to align with the top of the graphic about the book format. It's visually important. | |||
Some chapters and sections are aligned in this way; some are not. I started noting the ones that were not but gave up. | |||
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (PDT) | |||
'''May 4''': I see that the formatting of the first paragraph issue '''has been addressed'''. Is there a way of deleting discussion when the issue has been addressed? | |||
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:53, 18 May 2022
Use Discussion Pages like this one for editorial side-talk
It will be cleaner to use the Talk/Discussion pages for their intended use, namely for editors to talk about ideas for a given article, rather than place comments in the content of articles directly. We will see a lower incident of editorial notes being left to confuse readers if we take to this convention now Nate (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2013 (MST)
- One more thing. Be vigilant about signing your entries on the Discussion page with four tilde marks. Nate Russell (talk) 16:04, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
Formatting of first paragraph - an issue throughout
Somewhat odd space before the first para here. You might want to check formatting.
To my eye, we'd want the first para to align with the top of the graphic about the book format. It's visually important.
Some chapters and sections are aligned in this way; some are not. I started noting the ones that were not but gave up. Gayla Reid (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2013 (PDT)
May 4: I see that the formatting of the first paragraph issue has been addressed. Is there a way of deleting discussion when the issue has been addressed?