Difference between revisions of "ICBC and Compulsory Coverage (12:X)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
==== f) Reinstatement and Revival of No Fault Benefits ==== | ==== f) Reinstatement and Revival of No Fault Benefits ==== | ||
No-fault benefits can be reinstated if a person receiving benefits goes back to work only to find that the injury comes back and prevents them from working ([http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1999/1999canlii6570/1999canlii6570.html?autocompleteStr=brewer%20v%20ins&autocompletePos=1 ''Brewer v | No-fault benefits can be reinstated if a person receiving benefits goes back to work only to find that the injury comes back and prevents them from working ([http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1999/1999canlii6570/1999canlii6570.html?autocompleteStr=brewer%20v%20ins&autocompletePos=1 ''Brewer v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia''] 1999 CanLII 6570 (BC SC). This includes a situation where a plaintiff goes back to work prior to the end of the 104-week period and leaves work after the end of the 104-week period ([http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2016/2016bcca207/2016bcca207.html?autocompleteStr=symons%20v%20insu&autocompletePos=3 ''Symons v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia''], 2016 BCCA 207 (CanLII)). | ||
=== 4. Restrictions and Exclusion of Benefits === | === 4. Restrictions and Exclusion of Benefits === | ||