Difference between revisions of "ICBC and Personal Injury Claims (12:XII)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
#the plea of ''non est factum'' and want of ''consensus ad idem'' were unfounded in the circumstances. | #the plea of ''non est factum'' and want of ''consensus ad idem'' were unfounded in the circumstances. | ||
The implication of the ''Mix'' judgment is that the presence of any of the above factors in a particular set of facts may be sufficient to invalidate a general release. Note, however, that the mere fact that a plaintiff’s injuries became more serious than he or she anticipated when signing a release will generally not invalidate the release. | The implication of the ''Mix'' judgment is that the presence of any of the above factors in a particular set of facts may be sufficient to invalidate a general release. Note, however, that the mere fact that a plaintiff’s injuries became more serious than he or she anticipated when signing a release will generally '''not''' invalidate the release. | ||
== F. Plaintiff's Duty to Mitigate == | == F. Plaintiff's Duty to Mitigate == |