Difference between revisions of "Complaints Concerning Police Conduct (5:V)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) |
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
===== (1) Retired Judge ===== | ===== (1) Retired Judge ===== | ||
Previously, only a police commissioner would review the file. However, complainants can now request that the Commissioner appoint a retired judge to review the file and determine whether or not the decision was correct (''Police Act'', s 117(1)). The complainant must make the request in writing within '''10 business days''' of receiving the discipline authority's decision (''Police Act'', s 117(2)). It is rare to have a retired judge review the file in less serious cases due to limited resources. | Previously, only a police commissioner would review the file. However, complainants can now request that the Commissioner appoint a retired judge to review the file and determine whether or not the decision was correct (''Police Act'', s 117(1)). The complainant must make the request in writing within '''10 business days''' of receiving the discipline authority's decision (''Police Act'', s 117(2)). It is rare to have a retired judge review the file in less serious cases due to limited resources. There is a more realistic chance of success when the Commission appoints a retired judge. | ||
For further information, please see http://www.opcc.bc.ca. | For further information, please see http://www.opcc.bc.ca. | ||
==== Public Hearing ==== | ==== Public Hearing ==== |