5,483
edits
Difference between revisions of "Rights of the Child (6:VI)"
From Clicklaw Wikibooks
no edit summary
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = rights}} == A. School == === 1. Compulsory Attendance and Registration == The ''School Act'', RSBC 1996, c 412 states that all children must b...") |
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== A. School == | == A. School == | ||
=== 1. Compulsory Attendance and Registration == | === 1. Compulsory Attendance and Registration === | ||
The ''School Act'', RSBC 1996, c 412 states that all children must be enrolled by the first school day of a school year if, on or before December 31 of that school year, the child will have reached the age of 5 years (s 3(1)(a)). Parents may, however, defer enrolment until the first school day of the next school year (i.e. until age 6) (s 3(2)). Once enrolled, children must remain in an educational program until they are 16 (s 3(1)(b)). Whether children attend public or private schools, they must be registered on or before September 30 in each year either with a school or with the Minister (s 13). Students must also comply with the rules, code of conduct, and policies set by the Board or school (s 6). | The ''School Act'', RSBC 1996, c 412 states that all children must be enrolled by the first school day of a school year if, on or before December 31 of that school year, the child will have reached the age of 5 years (s 3(1)(a)). Parents may, however, defer enrolment until the first school day of the next school year (i.e. until age 6) (s 3(2)). Once enrolled, children must remain in an educational program until they are 16 (s 3(1)(b)). Whether children attend public or private schools, they must be registered on or before September 30 in each year either with a school or with the Minister (s 13). Students must also comply with the rules, code of conduct, and policies set by the Board or school (s 6). | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The ''School Act'' states that public schools must be conducted on strictly secular and non-sectarian principles (s 76(1)). | The ''School Act'' states that public schools must be conducted on strictly secular and non-sectarian principles (s 76(1)). | ||
''Moore v British Columbia (Education)'', 2012 SCC 61 at para 36 determined that BC had discriminated against a dyslexic boy when it cut the special needs program during a financial crisis. The SCC found that he was denied a service customarily available to the public. The service denied was not access to a special needs program, but meaningful access to education generally. Discrimination was found because the cuts disproportionately affected special needs programs and there was no evidence that BC considered other options. Parents are jointly | ''Moore v British Columbia (Education)'', 2012 SCC 61 at para 36 determined that BC had discriminated against a dyslexic boy when it cut the special needs program during a financial crisis. The SCC found that he was denied a service customarily available to the public. The service denied was not access to a special needs program, but meaningful access to education generally. Discrimination was found because the cuts disproportionately affected special needs programs and there was no evidence that BC considered other options. | ||
Parents are jointly and severally liable for intentional or negligent damage to school property caused by their children (s 10). There is no action against a Board or its employees unless the actionable conduct included dishonesty, gross negligence, malicious or wilful misconduct, or the cause of action is libel or slander (s 94(2)). Section 94 does not absolve a Board from vicarious liability. | |||
Any person who believes a child, whether registered or not, is not receiving an educational program can make a report to the superintendent of schools (s 14(1)). An action lies against that person only if the report is made maliciously (s 14(3)). | |||
School boards have a duty to provide an educational environment that is free from discriminatory harassment. This rule was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada on October 20, 2005, when it upheld a BC Human Rights Tribunal finding of discrimination against a BC school board in the homophobic harassment of one of its students: see ''Board of School Trustees of School District No 44 (North Vancouver) v Azmi Jubran'', et al [2005] SCCA No. 260 at para 91-102 (with costs and without reasons). Note that while the student was found to have been discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation, it was irrelevant whether he identified himself as homosexual, or whether his harassers knew or believed him to be homosexual. | |||
== B. Medical Attention == | |||
=== 1. Obligation to Provide Treatment === | |||
The ''Criminal Code'' (s 215) imposes criminal sanctions on parents who fail to provide their children with the necessaries of life until they reach the age of 16. This has been held to include adequate medical treatment, and a court may also extend the duty to an older child who cannot become independent of their parent(s) due to factors including age and illness. Section 218 of the ''Criminal Code'' imposes criminal sanctions on any person who abandons or exposes a child less than 10 years of age to the risk of permanent injury, damage to his or her health, or risk to his or her life. | |||
Under the CFCSA, children under the age of 19 may be removed if they are deprived of necessary medical attention, but only by a court order (s 29). Where a child is removed, emergency medical care can be given at the Director’s authorization (s 32). In cases where the only issue is the parents’ refusal of necessary medical attention, the Director can apply for a court order authorizing the medical care without removing the child from the parents’ custody (s 29). | |||
=== 2. Consent to Treatment === | |||
In Canadian case law, the courts have found that a minor can consent to treatment as a “mature minor” if that particular person has the mental capacity to understand the nature and risks of that particular treatment (see also ''Infants Act'', s 17). A minor, who is living away from home, working, or married, may be found to be autonomous, and free from parental control, and thus capable of consenting to or refusing treatment on his or her own behalf. | |||
Under the ''Infants Act'', (s 17), a minor can consent to surgical, medical, mental, or dental treatment without the agreement of their parents, so long as the health care provider has: i) explained to the infant and has been satisfied that the infant understands the nature and consequences and the reasonably foreseeable benefits and risks of the health care; and ii) has made reasonable efforts to determine and has concluded that the health care is in the infant's best interests. This includes requests for birth control advice and products, and for abortions. | |||
A court of competent jurisdiction may order medical treatment for any child if the court is satisfied that such treatment is required, and that parental consent is being unreasonably withheld. This is part of the inherent parens patriae (guardian of persons under a legal disability) jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, and is now codified under s 29 of the ''Child, Family and Community Service Act'' [CFCSA]. | |||
