5,109
edits
Difference between revisions of "Revocation of a Will (16:VI)"
From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Revocation of a Will (16:VI) (view source)
Revision as of 23:00, 4 August 2020
, 23:00, 4 August 2020no edit summary
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Also, there is the question of whether the intention to revoke the will was absolute or conditional. If it was absolute, revocation is complete. However, if the intent depended on the condition of reviving an old will or writing a new one and the condition or contingency has not been satisfied, the revocation is ineffective. This is known as the doctrine of dependent relative revocation: see ''Jung v Lee Estate'', 2005 BCSC 1537. | Also, there is the question of whether the intention to revoke the will was absolute or conditional. If it was absolute, revocation is complete. However, if the intent depended on the condition of reviving an old will or writing a new one and the condition or contingency has not been satisfied, the revocation is ineffective. This is known as the doctrine of dependent relative revocation: see ''Jung v Lee Estate'', 2005 BCSC 1537. | ||
== C. By Subsequent Will == | == C. By Subsequent Will == | ||
