Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Avenues to Address Crime for Victims (4:IV)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Line 27: Line 27:


Although the restitution order is made by a criminal court as part of an offender’s sentence, it is similar to a civil order in some respects.  If the offender does not pay the amount ordered, the victim can file the order in the civil court and use civil enforcement methods to collect the money.  For example, bank accounts may be seized or liens may be placed on property.  
Although the restitution order is made by a criminal court as part of an offender’s sentence, it is similar to a civil order in some respects.  If the offender does not pay the amount ordered, the victim can file the order in the civil court and use civil enforcement methods to collect the money.  For example, bank accounts may be seized or liens may be placed on property.  


=== 1. The Canadian Victims Bill of Rights ===
=== 1. The Canadian Victims Bill of Rights ===
Line 59: Line 58:


Additional information can be found [https://www.canada.ca/en/services/policing/victims/rolerights.html here].  
Additional information can be found [https://www.canada.ca/en/services/policing/victims/rolerights.html here].  


=== 2. Court Orientation, Preparation and Accompaniment ===
=== 2. Court Orientation, Preparation and Accompaniment ===
Line 68: Line 66:


Victims can also request language assistance, including visual language assistance, if they are required to testify in court. The Ministry of Justice provides court interpreters to translate criminal and family law court proceedings in a variety of different languages. Additional language support for other court-related activities is available through outside organizations. Individuals can find a full list of language assistance services available [https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/justice/criminal-justice/bcs-criminal-justice-system/services-and-resources/translation-services here].
Victims can also request language assistance, including visual language assistance, if they are required to testify in court. The Ministry of Justice provides court interpreters to translate criminal and family law court proceedings in a variety of different languages. Additional language support for other court-related activities is available through outside organizations. Individuals can find a full list of language assistance services available [https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/justice/criminal-justice/bcs-criminal-justice-system/services-and-resources/translation-services here].


=== 3. Things you should know about being a witness ===
=== 3. Things you should know about being a witness ===


Although as stated above there are many resources available to witnesses to assist them and to make the process of giving evidence in court less stressful it is important that before a person decides to be a witness in a criminal case, they understand the possibly intrusive and uncomfortable experience that they may be put through by agreeing to give evidence. This is particularly important for victims as the process may make them feel as if they are being revictimized.  
Although as stated above there are many resources available to witnesses to assist them and to make the process of giving evidence in court less stressful it is important that before a person decides to be a witness in a criminal case, they understand the possibly intrusive and uncomfortable experience that they may be put through by agreeing to give evidence. This is particularly important for victims as the process may make them feel as if they are being revictimized.  


'''All witnesses are generally compellable'''  
'''All witnesses are generally compellable'''  


It is also important to understand that a competent witness is generally a compellable witness. Therefore, once you agree to give evidence or clearly make it known that you are a witness to a crime, a subpoena can be issued which compels you to attend court on a specific date to give evidence. If you have been served with a subpoena and you then fail to show up for the trial or later refuse to give evidence at trial, you can be charged with contempt. Also, if you lie while giving evidence in court, you can be charged with perjury.  
It is also important to understand that a competent witness is generally a compellable witness. Therefore, once you agree to give evidence or clearly make it known that you are a witness to a crime, a subpoena can be issued which compels you to attend court on a specific date to give evidence. If you have been served with a subpoena and you then fail to show up for the trial or later refuse to give evidence at trial, you can be charged with contempt. Also, if you lie while giving evidence in court, you can be charged with perjury.  


'''Cross-examination can be stressful'''
'''Cross-examination can be stressful'''


Cross-examination can be a stressful experience for a witness. Defence counsel will likely challenge a witness’ evidence in an attempt to show that they are not a credible witness or that the evidence they are giving is unreliable.  Defence counsel will generally do this by showing: the witness’s testimony is inconsistent with other independent evidence; they have made prior inconsistent statements; or their testimony has changed during direct examination and cross-examination.  Defence counsel may also attempt to show that the witness has a motive to lie or mislead the court, which may include cross-examining them on any bias or prejudice they have towards the accused.  Even if a witness appears credible, the defence may attempt to show that their evidence is unreliable because they are mistaken about what they saw.   
Cross-examination can be a stressful experience for a witness. Defence counsel will likely challenge a witness’ evidence in an attempt to show that they are not a credible witness or that the evidence they are giving is unreliable.  Defence counsel will generally do this by showing: the witness’s testimony is inconsistent with other independent evidence; they have made prior inconsistent statements; or their testimony has changed during direct examination and cross-examination.  Defence counsel may also attempt to show that the witness has a motive to lie or mislead the court, which may include cross-examining them on any bias or prejudice they have towards the accused.  Even if a witness appears credible, the defence may attempt to show that their evidence is unreliable because they are mistaken about what they saw.   


'''Discreditable conduct of a witness can be used to challenge their credibility'''
'''Discreditable conduct of a witness can be used to challenge their credibility'''


S 12 of the ''Canadian Evidence Act'' states “a witness may be questioned as to whether the witness has been convicted of any offence, excluding any offence designated as a contravention under the ''Contraventions Act'', but including such an offence where the conviction was entered after a trial on an indictment.” In [https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/1989/1989canlii7241/1989canlii7241.html ''R v Cullen'', 52 CCC (3d) 459] the Ontario Court of Appeal stated at para 9 that, “for the purpose of challenging a witness’ credibility, cross-examination is permissible to demonstrate that a witness has been involved in discreditable conduct.” Therefore, with the exception of the accused a witness can not only be cross-examined on any criminal record that they have, but they can also be cross-examined on the details of those convictions, any pending charges, acquittals, or any other discreditable conduct which they may not have been charged with. So, for example, the defence could hire a private investigator to follow a witness and if they gather evidence of discreditable conduct that the witness has been involved in, they could cross-examine that witness on that conduct for the purpose of discrediting the witness in court.  
S 12 of the ''Canadian Evidence Act'' states “a witness may be questioned as to whether the witness has been convicted of any offence, excluding any offence designated as a contravention under the ''Contraventions Act'', but including such an offence where the conviction was entered after a trial on an indictment.” In [https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/1989/1989canlii7241/1989canlii7241.html ''R v Cullen'', 52 CCC (3d) 459] the Ontario Court of Appeal stated at para 9 that, “for the purpose of challenging a witness’ credibility, cross-examination is permissible to demonstrate that a witness has been involved in discreditable conduct.” Therefore, with the exception of the accused a witness can not only be cross-examined on any criminal record that they have, but they can also be cross-examined on the details of those convictions, any pending charges, acquittals, or any other discreditable conduct which they may not have been charged with. So, for example, the defence could hire a private investigator to follow a witness and if they gather evidence of discreditable conduct that the witness has been involved in, they could cross-examine that witness on that conduct for the purpose of discrediting the witness in court.  


'''An accused can make an application to have third-party records of witnesses such as counselling records disclosed'''  
'''An accused can make an application to have third-party records of witnesses such as counselling records disclosed'''  
Line 95: Line 88:


The process the court undergoes when deciding whether to admit the records involves “the balancing of the rights of the accused under ss 7 and 11 of the ''Charter'' with the privacy rights of the complainant.”  Unlike documents which the prosecution has in their possession, the burden is on the accused to prove that third-party records should be disclosed because the information is not part of the prosecution’s case, and third-parties have no obligation to assist the defence.  However, under s 278.5 if the trial judge is satisfied that the defence’s application is made in accordance with s 278.3, and that they have established that the record is likely relevant to an issue at trial or to the competence of the witness to testify, and production of the record is necessary in the interests of justice, then they may order the third-party to produce the records. The trial judge will then review the records and may order their disclosure to the accused under s 278.7.  
The process the court undergoes when deciding whether to admit the records involves “the balancing of the rights of the accused under ss 7 and 11 of the ''Charter'' with the privacy rights of the complainant.”  Unlike documents which the prosecution has in their possession, the burden is on the accused to prove that third-party records should be disclosed because the information is not part of the prosecution’s case, and third-parties have no obligation to assist the defence.  However, under s 278.5 if the trial judge is satisfied that the defence’s application is made in accordance with s 278.3, and that they have established that the record is likely relevant to an issue at trial or to the competence of the witness to testify, and production of the record is necessary in the interests of justice, then they may order the third-party to produce the records. The trial judge will then review the records and may order their disclosure to the accused under s 278.7.  


'''Legal representation for witnesses if an application is made to see their personal records'''
'''Legal representation for witnesses if an application is made to see their personal records'''
Line 104: Line 96:


The Legal Services Society manual can be accessed [https://lss.bc.ca/sites/default/files/2019-03/introduction_Oct09.pdf here].
The Legal Services Society manual can be accessed [https://lss.bc.ca/sites/default/files/2019-03/introduction_Oct09.pdf here].


=== 4. Victim Travel Fund ===
=== 4. Victim Travel Fund ===
Line 117: Line 108:


Furthermore, you may contact VictimLinkBC by phone at 604-875-0885 or email victimlinkbc@bc211.ca to ask to be connected to a victim service worker. A victim service worker may be able to help you apply for travel assistance.
Furthermore, you may contact VictimLinkBC by phone at 604-875-0885 or email victimlinkbc@bc211.ca to ask to be connected to a victim service worker. A victim service worker may be able to help you apply for travel assistance.


=== 5. Parole Board of Canada Hearings ===
=== 5. Parole Board of Canada Hearings ===
Line 128: Line 118:


For more information, see the [http://canada.justice.gc.ca/eng/fund-fina/cj-jp/fund-fond/attend-audience.html Department of Justice website].
For more information, see the [http://canada.justice.gc.ca/eng/fund-fina/cj-jp/fund-fond/attend-audience.html Department of Justice website].


== B. Pursuing the Matter in a Civil (Tort) Action ==
== B. Pursuing the Matter in a Civil (Tort) Action ==
2,734

edits