Difference between revisions of "Conditional Sales Contracts and Security Agreements (11:VI)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= July 29, 2020}}
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 8, 2021}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = consumer}}
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = consumer}}


The ''Personal Property Security Act'', RSBC 1996, c 359 [''PPSA''] governs conditional sales agreements and security contracts. It established a new unified system for the registration, priority, and enforcement of transactions where collateral is given to secure payment or the performance of an obligation. The main purpose of the ''PPSA'' is to offer lenders or creditors a system of priority vis-à-vis other creditors where it is necessary for the lender or seller to take an interest in personal property to ensure the obligations of the borrower or purchaser are met. The legislation effectively creates a system for the registration and enforcement of a security interest against personal property.  
The ''Personal Property Security Act'', RSBC 1996, c 359 [PPSA] governs conditional sales agreements (e.g. the contract is subject to some condition to be fulfilled later) and security contracts. The ''PPSA'' established a new unified system for the registration, priority, and enforcement of transactions where collateral is given to secure payment or the performance of an obligation. The main purpose of the ''PPSA'' is to offer lenders or creditors a system of priority vis-à-vis other creditors where it is necessary for the lender or seller to take an interest in personal property to ensure the obligations of the borrower or purchaser are met. The legislation effectively creates a system for the registration and enforcement of a security interest against personal property.


Under s 2, the ''PPSA'' governs every transaction that creates a security interest. A “security interest” is defined in s 1 as an interest in goods that secures payment or the performance of an obligation.  
Under s 2, the ''PPSA'' governs every transaction that creates a security interest, regardless of the form of the agreement, even in agreements that do not appear to be security agreements, so long as it is creating a security interest in substance. A “'''security interest'''” is defined in s 1(1) as an interest in goods that secures payment or the performance of an obligation.


Note: For the purposes of this section, goods is used to define security interests. However, the actual definition is broader than that. For more information, see ss 1(a) and ss 1(b) “security interest”.  
:'''NOTE:''' For the purposes of this section, goods is used to define security interests. However, the actual definition is broader than that. For more information, see ss 1(a) and ss 1(b) “security interest”.  


[[Introduction to Creditors%27 Remedies (10:I) | Chapter 10: Creditors’ Remedies and Debtors’ Assistance]] has a discussion on the protection offered to a consumer by the ''PPSA'', including the requirements of enforceable security. The ''PPSA'' has some special considerations applicable if the goods in which the collateral was taken were consumer goods. Consumer goods are defined in s 1 as goods that are acquired primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.  
[[Introduction to Creditors%27 Remedies (10:I) | Chapter 10: Creditors’ Remedies and Debtors’ Assistance]] has a discussion on the protection offered to a consumer by the ''PPSA'', including the requirements of enforceable security. The ''PPSA'' has some special considerations applicable if the goods in which the collateral was taken were consumer goods. '''Consumer goods''' are defined in s 1(1) as goods that are acquired primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.


== A. Creditor’s Remedies Against the Debtor ==
== A. Creditor’s Remedies Against the Debtor ==
Line 14: Line 14:
=== 1. Control by the Creditor ===
=== 1. Control by the Creditor ===


Section 58 provides that where the debtor defaults on a security agreement, the creditor can take control of the collateral item through any method authorised by law with a few select exceptions (s 56). Where, however, the collateral is a consumer good and the debtor has paid two-thirds of the total amount secured, the creditor may not seize the goods without an application to the court (s 58(3)).
Under s 58, the ''PPSA'' provides that, where the debtor defaults on a security agreement, the creditor can take control of the collateral item through any method authorised by law with a few select exceptions (s 56). Where, however, the collateral is a consumer good and the debtor has paid two-thirds of the total amount secured, the creditor may '''not''' seize the goods without an application to the court (s 58(3))


=== 2. Action by the Creditor ===
=== 2. Action by the Creditor ===


A creditor can sue the debtor for breach of contract and seek repayment of the monies owed. Unless the security interest has been taken in consumer goods, the secured party can seize '''and''' sue for any deficiency. When consumer goods form all or merely a portion of the collateral, the secured party must elect to '''seize or sue''', subject to s 58(3).
A creditor (lender) can sue the debtor (borrower) for breach of contract and seek repayment of the monies owed. Additionally, the creditor can enforce their interest in the collateral by seizure (s 58) or possession (s 61). Generally, the secured party (lender) can seize '''and''' sue for any deficiency. However, when consumer goods form all or merely a portion of the collateral, the secured party must elect to '''seize or sue''', subject to s 58(3).


=== 3. Acceleration Clauses ===
=== 3. Acceleration Clauses ===


A security agreement provides that a creditor may accelerate payment (or performance) by the debtor if the creditor, in good faith, believes and has commercially reasonable grounds to believe that the prospect of payment or performance is about to be impaired or that the collateral is or is about to be placed in jeopardy (s 16).
A security agreement provides that a creditor may accelerate payment (or performance) by the debtor if the creditor, in good faith, believes and has commercially reasonable grounds to believe that the prospect of payment or performance is about to be impaired or that the collateral is or is about to be placed in jeopardy (s 16).  


== B. Restrictions on the Creditor’s Right to Dispose ==
== B. Restrictions on the Creditor’s Right to Dispose ==


Section 59 provides that a creditor cannot sell the seized goods before the expiration of the 20-day notice period as every party entitled to notice under ss 59(6) or ss 59(10) via approved method outlined in s 72 may redeem the collateral by fulfilling the obligations secured in the security agreement (s 62). Where the collateral is a consumer good, the redeeming party need only pay the amount in arrears (s 62(1)(b)), plus reasonable seizure fees. This is known as the right of re-instatement. It cannot be used more than twice in a 12-month period (s 62(2)).
Under s 59 of the ''PPSA'', a creditor cannot sell the seized goods before the expiration of the '''20-day''' notice period, as every party entitled to notice under ss 59(6) or ss 59(10) via approved methods outlined in s 72 may '''redeem''' the collateral by fulfilling the obligations secured in the security agreement (s 62). Where the collateral is a consumer good, the redeeming party need only pay the amount in arrears (i.e. debt owing to date) plus reasonable seizure fees (s 62(1)(b)). This is known as the '''right of reinstatement'''. It cannot be used more than twice in a 12-month period (s 62(2)).


== C. Disqualification from “Seize or Sue” Provisions ==
== C. Disqualification from “Seize or Sue” Provisions ==


A party with a security interest in consumer goods may avoid the “seize or sue” restriction where:  
A party with a security interest in consumer goods may avoid the “seize or sue” restriction where:
*a) the debtor has engaged in wilful or reckless acts or neglect which have caused substantial damage or deterioration to the goods, and the secured party may seek a court order pursuant to s 67(9) disqualifying the debtor from the rights and remedies ordinarily available under ss 67(1) - (7); or  
* a) The debtor (borrower) is a company, a partnership of corporations, or a joint venture of corporations (s 55(4)(a));
*b) the secured party discovers after seizure that an accession that was collateral has been removed and not replaced by other goods of equivalent value and free from prior security interests; a claim may be advanced against the debtor for the value of the accession (s 67(8)).  
* b) The debtor has engaged in wilful or reckless acts or neglect which have caused substantial damage or deterioration to the goods, and the secured party may seek a court order pursuant to s 67(9) disqualifying the debtor from the rights and remedies ordinarily available under  
ss 67(1) (7); or
* c) The secured party discovers after seizure that an accession that was collateral has been removed and not replaced by other goods of equivalent value and free from prior security interests; a claim may be advanced against the debtor for the value of the accession (s 67(8)).  


Note: Accession means goods that are installed in or affixed to other goods. For example, a shovel attached to a truck. See s 38 and ss 1(1) for more information about accessions.  
:'''NOTE:''' Accession means goods that are installed in or affixed to other goods. For example, a shovel attached to a truck. See ss 38 and 1(1) for more information about accessions.  


The seizure of consumer goods generally extinguishes the debt in relation to the security agreement. However, there are exceptions under s 67:
The seizure of consumer goods generally extinguishes the debt in relation to the security agreement. However, there are exceptions under s 67:
*If the creditor returns the consumer goods within 20 days after the seizure, that will revive the debt;  
* If the creditor (lender) returns the consumer goods within 20 days after the seizure, that will revive the debt;
*If the security agreement is a mortgage or an agreement for sale and the consumer goods are part of this security, in the case that the lender exercises their rights under the mortgage or agreement of sale but does not seize the goods, the debt is not extinguished;  
* If the security agreement is a mortgage or an agreement for sale and the consumer goods are part of this security, in the case that the lender exercises their rights under the mortgage or agreement of sale but does not seize the goods, the debt is '''not''' extinguished; or
*If the creditor has a purchase money security interest in the seized consumer goods and other consumer goods, the debt is extinguished to the extent identified in the security instrument as relating to the seized consumer goods.
* If the creditor (lender) has a purchase money security interest in the seized consumer goods and other consumer goods, the debt is extinguished to the extent identified in the security instrument as relating to the seized consumer goods.


These qualifications also apply in the event of a voluntary foreclosure and a voluntary surrender of consumer goods rather than a seizure.
These qualifications also apply in the event of a voluntary foreclosure and a voluntary surrender of consumer goods rather than a seizure.
For consumer goods only, if the creditor (lender) chooses not to enforce their interest in the collateral and chooses to seek judgement instead, the security interest in the collateral is also extinguished (s 67(10)(a)).


== D. Third Party Purchaser’s Rights ==
== D. Third Party Purchaser’s Rights ==
Line 69: Line 73:
Therefore, if the consumer does not get what they have paid for, that person may not be required to pay the loan back when pressed for payment by the assignee. Also, if the seller does not fulfil obligations under a warranty, the consumer will be able to resist payment.  (See ''Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Geldart'', [1985] BCJ No 1973 and ''Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Kabatoff'', [1986] BCJ No 942)
Therefore, if the consumer does not get what they have paid for, that person may not be required to pay the loan back when pressed for payment by the assignee. Also, if the seller does not fulfil obligations under a warranty, the consumer will be able to resist payment.  (See ''Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Geldart'', [1985] BCJ No 1973 and ''Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Kabatoff'', [1986] BCJ No 942)


{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 8, 2021}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}