Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Starting a Court Proceeding in a Family Matter"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
m
Line 98: Line 98:
<blockquote>'''7. Have a trial management conference (TMC).''' A TMC is a formal hearing before a judge designed to fix the schedule of events at the trial and resolve as many disputes about evidence before trial as possible. Among other things, the judge will ask about the witnesses each party intends to present, the completeness of the disclosure made to date, expert's reports and expert witnesses, and anything else that can be dealt with to help make sure the trial will go ahead and be completed within the time available. A TMC is generally not an opportunity to engage in settlement discussions.</blockquote>
<blockquote>'''7. Have a trial management conference (TMC).''' A TMC is a formal hearing before a judge designed to fix the schedule of events at the trial and resolve as many disputes about evidence before trial as possible. Among other things, the judge will ask about the witnesses each party intends to present, the completeness of the disclosure made to date, expert's reports and expert witnesses, and anything else that can be dealt with to help make sure the trial will go ahead and be completed within the time available. A TMC is generally not an opportunity to engage in settlement discussions.</blockquote>


<blockquote>'''8. Go to trial.''' At the end of the day, if you can't agree on a resolution you will wind up at trial. At the trial, each side will call their witnesses to give evidence, cross-examine the witnesses of the other party, and give their argument as to why the judge ought to decide the case in their favour. The judge will hear all the evidence and the arguments, and reach a decision in the form of ''Reasons for Judgment''. The lawyers, or the court clerk in the absence of lawyers, will prepare a final order based on the reasons for judgment.</blockquote>
<blockquote>'''8. Go to trial.''' At the end of the day, if you can't agree on a resolution you will wind up at trial. At the trial, each side will call their witnesses to give evidence, cross-examine the witnesses of the other party, and give their argument as to why the judge ought to decide the case in their favour. The judge will hear all the evidence and the arguments, and reach a decision in the form of ''reasons for judgment''. The lawyers, or the court clerk in the absence of lawyers, will prepare a final order based on the reasons for judgment.</blockquote>


This description of the steps involved is just a rough sketch of the lengthy process of bringing an action to a conclusion. Not every case will need to use all of these steps (some people may not need to have examinations for discovery and others won't see the point of holding a settlement conference, for example), and some steps may need to be repeated more than once. As well, the actual trial process is much, much more complex that my <span class="noglossary">brief</span> description.
This description of the steps involved is just a rough sketch of the lengthy process of bringing an action to a conclusion. Not every case will need to use all of these steps (some people may not need to have examinations for discovery and others won't see the point of holding a settlement conference, for example), and some steps may need to be repeated more than once. As well, the actual trial process is much, much more complex that my <span class="noglossary">brief</span> description.
2,443

edits