Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "ICBC and Personal Injury Claims (12:XII)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
case links
(removed bad reference)
(case links)
Line 229: Line 229:
ICBC has an obligation to protect the insured by making an effort to settle the claim in the limits of the amounts of coverage. Insurers are under an obligation to consider the interests of their insured in deciding whether to settle a claim. The insurer assumes by contract the power of deciding whether to settle and it must exercise that power in good faith.  
ICBC has an obligation to protect the insured by making an effort to settle the claim in the limits of the amounts of coverage. Insurers are under an obligation to consider the interests of their insured in deciding whether to settle a claim. The insurer assumes by contract the power of deciding whether to settle and it must exercise that power in good faith.  


In ''Fredrikson v ICBC'' (1990), 44 BCLR (2d) 303 (S.C), Esson CJ. summarizes the law respecting the insurer’s duty to its insureds in certain areas discussed therein. In this particular case, ICBC acted in good faith, and in a fair and open manner, followed the course the insured wished to take. Among the points raised in the judgment are: i) the exclusive discretionary power of ICBC to settle liability claims places  the insured at the mercy of the insurer ii) this vulnerability imposes duties on the insurer to act in good faith and deal fairly, and to not act contrary to the interests of the insured, or, at least, to fully advise the insured of its intention to do so; iii) the insurer’s duty to  defend includes the obligation to defend by all lawful means the amount of any judgment awarded against the insured.  
In [http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1990/1990canlii3814/1990canlii3814.html?autocompleteStr=fredrikson%20v&autocompletePos=2 ''Fredrikson v ICBC''], 1990 CanLII 3814 (BCSC), Esson CJ. summarizes the law respecting the insurer’s duty to its insureds in certain areas discussed therein. In this particular case, ICBC acted in good faith, and in a fair and open manner, followed the course the insured wished to take. Among the points raised in the judgment are:
*i) the exclusive discretionary power of ICBC to settle liability claims places  the insured at the mercy of the insurer
*ii) this vulnerability imposes duties on the insurer to act in good faith and deal fairly, and to not act contrary to the interests of the insured, or, at least, to fully advise the insured of its intention to do so;
*iii) the insurer’s duty to  defend includes the obligation to defend by all lawful means the amount of any judgment awarded against the insured.  


See ''Shea v Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation'' (1991), 55 BCLR (2d) 15 (SC), per Finch J.  
See also [http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1991/1991canlii616/1991canlii616.html?autocompleteStr=shea%20v%20ma&autocompletePos=1 ''Shea v Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation''] 1991 CanLII 616 (BCSC), per Finch J.


=== 4. Formal Offers to Settle and Cost Consequences ===
=== 4. Formal Offers to Settle and Cost Consequences ===
5,109

edits