Difference between revisions of "Talk:Provincial Court Forms (Family Law)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Same as for Supreme Court: why not get rid of that (Family law) in the title (it's just legalese) and use '''Provincial Court: Forms & Examples'''.")
 
m
 
Line 2: Line 2:


why not get rid of that (Family law) in the title (it's just legalese) and use '''Provincial Court: Forms & Examples'''.
why not get rid of that (Family law) in the title (it's just legalese) and use '''Provincial Court: Forms & Examples'''.
[[User:Gayla Reid|Gayla Reid]] ([[User talk:Gayla Reid|talk]]) 20:10, 30 April 2013 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 03:10, 1 May 2013

Same as for Supreme Court:

why not get rid of that (Family law) in the title (it's just legalese) and use Provincial Court: Forms & Examples.

Gayla Reid (talk) 20:10, 30 April 2013 (PDT)