Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "ICBC and Compulsory Coverage (12:X)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Line 172: Line 172:
According to [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/1931/1931canlii473/1931canlii473.html?autocompleteStr=mcknight%20v%20general&autocompletePos=1 McKnight v General Casualty Insurance Co. of Paris], 1931 CanLII 473 (BC CA), an insured need not provide information or evidence to an insurance company respecting a breach if the company is contemplating using such a breach to deny coverage to the insured. This is not considered to be refusing to cooperate with the insurer in the defence of the action. However, the insured may still have to provide information regarding the accident itself.
According to [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/1931/1931canlii473/1931canlii473.html?autocompleteStr=mcknight%20v%20general&autocompletePos=1 McKnight v General Casualty Insurance Co. of Paris], 1931 CanLII 473 (BC CA), an insured need not provide information or evidence to an insurance company respecting a breach if the company is contemplating using such a breach to deny coverage to the insured. This is not considered to be refusing to cooperate with the insurer in the defence of the action. However, the insured may still have to provide information regarding the accident itself.


== C. Accident (“No Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the ''IVR'' ==
== C. Accident (“No Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the ''IVR''* ==


=== 1. What are “No Fault” Benefits? ===
=== 1. What are “No Fault” Benefits? ===
5,109

edits