5,109
edits
Difference between revisions of "Consumer Protection from Deceptive and Unconscionable Acts (11:IV)"
From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Consumer Protection from Deceptive and Unconscionable Acts (11:IV) (view source)
Revision as of 19:31, 24 August 2023
, 19:31, 24 August 2023no edit summary
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= July 8, | {{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= July 8, 2023}} | ||
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = consumer}} | {{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = consumer}} | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
The court may draw the conclusion that a practice is deceptive on the basis of vague contractual language in circumstances where that language allowed the supplier to claim that additional work was not part of the original contract: see [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1999/1999canlii6663/1999canlii6663.html?autocompleteStr=British%20Columbia%20(Director%20of%20Trade%20Practices)%20v%20Van%20City%20Construction%20Ltd&autocompletePos=2 ''British Columbia (Director of Trade Practices) v Van City Construction Ltd'', [1999<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No 2033 (SC) (QL)]. | The court may draw the conclusion that a practice is deceptive on the basis of vague contractual language in circumstances where that language allowed the supplier to claim that additional work was not part of the original contract: see [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1999/1999canlii6663/1999canlii6663.html?autocompleteStr=British%20Columbia%20(Director%20of%20Trade%20Practices)%20v%20Van%20City%20Construction%20Ltd&autocompletePos=2 ''British Columbia (Director of Trade Practices) v Van City Construction Ltd'', [1999<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No 2033 (SC) (QL)]. | ||
For a list of statutorily defined deceptive acts and practices, see the following link: http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/04002_02#section4 | |||
=== 2. Unconscionable Acts === | === 2. Unconscionable Acts === | ||
