Builders Liens

What is a builders lien?

A builders lien is also known as a lien on land. It secures a claim for payment for work done on—or materials supplied to—a construction project or for repairs or renovations made to an existing structure. When a lien is registered in the Land Title Office, it becomes a charge against the title to the land or property involved.

Who can file a builders lien?

People and companies can claim a lien if they are:

1. workers on a construction project.
2. suppliers of materials (including renters of equipment) used on a project.
3. contractors hired by the landowner to work on the project.
4. subcontractors hired by the contractor or by other subcontractors to work on the project.
5. engineers and architects on the project.

However, a person who performs or provides work or supplies material to an architect, engineer or material supplier can’t file a builders lien.

Why file a builders lien?

A lien claimant can file a builders lien to secure payment for work done on—or material supplied to—an improvement to land, such as a construction project. A large construction project is like a pyramid, with a developer (usually a landowner) at the top. The landowner may handle the construction personally, or hire a general contractor. The general contractor may hire several subcontractors such as a plumber, electrician, and so on. Those subcontractors may in turn hire workers and material suppliers. Somewhere in this chain of contracts, someone may not get paid.

The BC Builders Lien Act (the Act) helps those who have worked on a construction project or supplied material to it, but haven’t been paid. Under this law, they can file a charge against the property to secure payment of the money owed to them.

But a builders lien is not always good security. When a project fails, those who have filed liens often receive only a fraction of what they are owed. The right to file a builders lien is no substitute for careful credit-granting practices. And people on a construction project who have not been paid have other options to collect money owing to them. They can sue the company or person who hired them, or anyone who guaranteed the debts or contractual obligations of that company or person. They can also make a claim against any bond that a contractor or subcontractor provided for the project. And they can make a claim against anyone who breached the trust provisions of the Act. Script 250, called “Collection of Debts” has more on this. It’s a complex area of law. For legal advice, consult a lawyer.

How does a lien claimant file a lien?

A claimant can file a lien personally or have a lawyer file it. The lien claimant must fill out a completed Claim of Lien (Builders Lien Act Form 5) and file it in the Land Title Office where the land is registered. It is important to complete the form accurately. The form is in the Regulations of the Act, available at some public libraries and at www.bclaws.ca. Click on “Statutes and Regulations” and then on the letter “B” in the alphabetical list. Scroll down and click on “Builders Lien Forms Regulation.”

To file a lien, you need the legal description of the project site—a street address is not enough. You can go to BC Assessment Authority’s area office to get free information on the legal description on their self-serve Webfiche. Office locations are listed at www.bcassessment.ca. Click on “About Us” and then on “Contact us”. You can also access Webfiche online, for a charge. The BC Assessment website has information on that. Lawyers can also provide the legal address.

What are the time limits to file a lien?

Claimants must act quickly to file a lien. If they wait too long, they lose the right to do so. Generally, the deadline to file a lien is 45 days after the project is substantially completed, abandoned or ended. But it may be necessary to file sooner. Once a “certificate of completion” is issued for a contract or subcontract, then the deadline is 45 days from the date the certificate was issued. Condominium projects and mines and quarries have different deadlines. Because the deadlines are short and can be confusing, it’s good to file the lien well before a deadline. The deadline is strict: a court cannot extend it.

Even if a claimant has not filed a lien within the time limit, they may still be able to file a lien against holdback funds that have not yet been distributed. This is often called a “Shimco” claim. To do this, the claimant must start a lawsuit in BC Supreme Court. The holdback fund is discussed below.

What must a claimant do after filing a lien?

A claimant must sue in BC Supreme Court to enforce the lien and prove it is valid. The lawsuit must be started in a Supreme Court Registry near the property. In other words, lawsuits to prove builder’s liens may only be filed at the Supreme Court, and only in the same jurisdiction as the land on which the lien is to be placed. (A claimant should get legal advice from a lawyer if it’s not clear which court registry is the right one.) The claimant must also file a “certificate of pending litigation” (CPL) against the property in the Land Title Office. The claimant must do both these things within a year of filing the lien or else the lien is no longer valid.

Because a builders lien is registered against the land, it can interfere with the landowner’s ability to sell the property or maintain mortgage financing for the project. This may encourage the landowner to take steps to “clear” the lien, which may involve paying the lien or providing other security.

What can a landowner do to remove a lien?

A landowner may not want to pay off the lien if there is a dispute about whether it is valid. Or the landowner may not be the person in default—for example, the lien claimant supplied materials to a subcontractor who has not paid for them. But in either case, the landowner may not want the property tied up in a long court battle that interferes with their selling or mortgaging it. The Act lets the landowner pay money into court—either the full amount of the lien or a smaller amount linked to the holdback kept from the person who owes the money. The court can then order the lien and CPL to be removed from the property. Then the lien has no further effect on the property. The money paid into court is held as security for the lien—to be paid to the claimant if the lien is eventually proven.

Can the landowner—or others on the project—speed things up?

Yes, the landowner, or other people involved in the project, can give the lien claimant a written notice to speed up the process. If this happens, the claimant must start the lawsuit and file the CPL within 21 days, instead of the usual year. If the claimant misses this time limit, the lien is removed. The court cannot extend the 21 days. But a claimant may still have a valid Shimco claim against the holdback fund, explained below. In other words, there is no specific time limit to bring a claim against the holdback monies provided they haven’t been paid out.

What happens in court?

If the landowner doesn’t pay the lien, and the court decides it is valid, the court may order the sale of the property and the use of the sale proceeds to pay the lien. But if the court decides the lien is not valid, it will remove the lien, and it may order the claimant to pay the landowner’s costs resulting from the lien and the court case.

Sales of property to pay liens are actually quite rare. More often, if liens are proven, the amount of the holdback fund available to satisfy the liens is calculated. Then the parties negotiate and the lien claimants are paid their proportionate share of the available holdback funds.

How does the Act help claimants get money owed to them?

Sometimes, the landowner will properly pay its contractors (or its head contractor) but one or more of them won’t pay its subcontractors or they won’t pay their workers or suppliers. All the unpaid parties could then file liens and the landowner would have to pay all of them too. It wouldn’t be fair to make the landowner pay twice, so the Act uses a system called the “holdback” to protect the landowner if the general contractor or a subcontractor defaults, or does not pay what they owe.

The landowner must hold back 10% of the contract price until 55 days after the general contract is substantially completed, abandoned, or otherwise ended. If the total project is over $100,000, the landowner must pay the 10% holdback into a holdback account at a bank or savings institution, administered jointly by the landowner and the contractor. After the 55 days are up, if no liens have been filed within the 45-day limit and no lawsuit making a Shimco claim has been started, the landowner can pay out the 10% holdback to the contractor. But if any liens have been filed, the holdback may be used to help pay these liens.

Often, the total of all liens filed by all claimants is greater than the holdback. The landowner does not have to pay lien claimants more than the holdback amount (plus any other money owed to the contractor and not needed to complete the contractor’s work or fix deficient work by the contractor). So claimants may receive only part of their lien—it depends on the details of the case. The Act sets out how claimants share the holdback.

Are there other holdbacks?

BC has a “multiple” holdback system. So contractors and subcontractors must also hold back 10% from any subcontractors they hire. But no holdback can be kept from workers, material suppliers, architects, or engineers—they must be paid in full. The value of these holdbacks may limit the amount a lien claimant can recover under the Act.

How can a contractor or subcontractor speed things up?

Contractors or subcontractors who have finished their part of a project may not want to wait until the whole project is done to get the 10% held back from them. The Act allows a holdback to be released 55 days after a certificate of completion is issued for their work. If the architect issues a certificate of completion for their contract or subcontract, the person can get their holdback 55 days after the certificate is issued—unless any liens have been filed within the 45-day time limit or any Shimco lawsuits have been filed against the holdback.

What about the “trust fund”?

The Act says that all money received by a contractor or subcontractor is a “trust fund” for the benefit of the people or companies hired for the project by the contractor or subcontractor. Contractors or subcontractors must pay for everything they owe for work and materials supplied for the project before they can use the money for anything else. If they don’t, they may be in breach of trust and their directors and officers may be personally liable.

Summary

Builders liens can be very complicated. You should get prompt legal advice if you are not sure of your position.

[updated August 2014]

---

---

In law, the re-examination of a term of an order or agreement, usually to determine whether the term remains fair and appropriate in light of the circumstances prevailing at the time of the review. In family law, particularly the review of an order or agreement provided for the payment of spousal support. See "de novo," "family law agreements," "order" and "spousal support."

In law, to formally deliver documents to a person in a manner that complies with the rules of court. Service may be ordinary (mailed or delivered to a litigant's address for service), personal (hand-delivered to a person), or substituted (performed in a way other than the rules normally require). See "address for delivery," "ordinary service," "personal service" and "substituted service."

Real property; a parcel of real property and the buildings upon it. See also "chattel," "ownership" and "possession."

(1) The assertion of a legal right to an order or to a thing; (2) the remedy or relief sought by a party to a court proceeding.

In law, the interpretation of something, like a document or a set of circumstances, so as to give it meaning. For example, if a separation agreement stated that one guardian "will have the children on Monday, Tuesday, and Friday" but didn’t say anything about the other guardian, the agreement would be constructed to mean that the other guardian would have the children on the days that weren't mentioned.

In law, a document demonstrating ownership of a thing. See "ownership."

Something which can be owned. See "chattels" and "real property."

In law, something that is relevant or important. A material fact, for example, is a fact relevant to a claim or a defence to a claim. See "claim," "evidence" and "fact."

The person who starts a court proceeding seeking an order for a specific remedy or relief against another person, the respondent. See "action" and "respondent."

In law, a form of possession of property in which a "trustee" keeps and manages property for the benefit of another person, the "beneficiary," without owning that property and usually without acquiring an interest in that property other than as payment for their services. The trustee holds the property in trust for the beneficiary. See "constructive trust," "ownership," "possession" and "resulting trust."

A person licensed to practice law in a particular jurisdiction by that jurisdiction's law society. See "barrister and solicitor."

In real property law, the full formal identification of a particular piece of property by its lot number, district lot number, block number, plan number, and land district, rather than by its street address. See "Land Title and Survey Authority," "PID," and "real property."

Under the old Divorce Act, the schedule of a parent's time with their children under an order or agreement, replaced with "parenting time" and "contact" in the new Divorce Act. Access usually referred to the schedule of the parent with the least amount of time with the child. See "contact," "custody" and "parenting time."

(1) Intentionally doing a thing, or (2) a law passed by a government, also called "legislation" or a "statute." See "regulations."

An agreement between two or more people, giving them obligations towards each other that can be enforced in court. A valid contract must be offered by one person and accepted by the other, and some form of payment or other thing of value must generally be exchanged between the parties to the contract.

Normally referred to as the "Supreme Court of British Columbia," this court hears most of the trials in this province. The Supreme Court is a court of inherent jurisdiction and has no limits on the sorts of claims it can hear or on the sorts of orders it can make. Decisions of the Provincial Court are appealed to the Supreme Court; decisions of the Supreme Court are appealed to the Court of Appeal. See "Court of Appeal," "jurisdiction," "Provincial Court" and "Supreme Court of Canada."

With respect to courts, (1) the authority of the court to hear an action and make orders, (2) the limits of the authority of a particular judicial official, (3) the geographic location of a court, or (4) the territorial limits of a court's authority. With respect to governments, (5) the authority of a government to make legislation as determined by the constitution, or (6) the limits of authority of a particular government agency. See “constitution."

A central office, located in each judicial district, at which the court files for each court proceeding in that district are maintained, and at which legal documents can be filed, searched and reviewed.

The short form for "Certificate of Pending Litigation." See "Certificate of Pending Litigation."

The conditional transfer of the title to real property by an owner to another person in return for money given by that person as a loan, while retaining possession of the property. The party to whom title is given, the "mortgagee," usually a bank, is allowed to register the title of the property in their name if the person taking the loan, the "mortgagor," fails to make the required payments. See "encumbrance" and "real property."

In law, failing to do something which is either optional or mandatory, such as failing to respond to an application or to a claim within the time limits set out in the rules of court. See "default judgment."

(1) In law, a court proceeding; a lawsuit; an action; a cause of action; a claim. (2) A historic decision of the court; case law. See "action," "case law, " "court proceeding," and "precedent."

A mandatory direction of the court that is binding and enforceable upon the parties to a court proceeding. An "interim order" is a temporary order made following the hearing of an interim application. A "final order" is a permanent order, made following the trial of the court proceeding or the parties' settlement, following which the only recourse open to a dissatisfied party is to appeal. Failing to abide by the terms of an order may constitute contempt of court. See "appeal," "consent order," "contempt of court," "decision" and "declaration."

An agreement to transfer the ownership of property from one person to another in exchange for the reciprocal transfer of something else, usually money. See "agreement."

In law, a calculation of the allowable legal expenses of a party to a court proceeding, as determined by the Supreme Court Family Rules. The party who is most successful in a court proceeding is usually awarded their "costs" of the proceeding. See "account," "bill of costs," "Certificate of Costs or Expenses" and "lawyer's fees."

In law, (1) a lawyer's bill to their client or a statement, or (2) a person's recollection of events.