Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Changing Family Law Orders and Agreements Involving Children"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi Nate - thanks for the message. Definitely will review the case - we are due to have a team meeting later this month and will discuss this case and a few other cases at that time. Edits should be forthcoming shortly!
--[[User:Justin Werb|Justin Werb]] ([[User talk:Justin Werb|talk]]) 17:37, 9 August 2013 (PDT)
==New cases on relocation==
==New cases on relocation==
Editors of this page (Justin, Ron and Mary) may want to see if the new Supreme Court case [http://canlii.ca/t/fztt9 L.J.R. v. S.W.R.] means that any changes to the section on "Relocating with or without a child" should be considered.--[[User:Nate Russell|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell|talk]]) 15:49, 9 August 2013 (PDT)
Editors of this page (Justin, Ron and Mary) may want to see if the new Supreme Court case [http://canlii.ca/t/fztt9 L.J.R. v. S.W.R.] means that any changes to the section on "Relocating with or without a child" should be considered.--[[User:Nate Russell|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell|talk]]) 15:49, 9 August 2013 (PDT)
:Hi Nate - thanks for the message. Definitely will review the case - we are due to have a team meeting later this month and will discuss this case and a few other cases at that time. Edits should be forthcoming shortly!--[[User:Justin Werb|Justin Werb]] ([[User talk:Justin Werb|talk]]) 17:37, 9 August 2013 (PDT)
::Glad to hear you are all meeting to discuss this. Justin, I have taken the liberty to move your reply comment to underneath my original one, since that is the easiest way to know which comments are connected.--[[User:Nate Russell|Nate Russell]] ([[User talk:Nate Russell|talk]]) 11:11, 12 August 2013 (PDT)