Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Introduction to Compensation Claims for Injured Workers (7:III)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
no edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


If the worker (or the employer) disagrees with the Board’s decision, he or she may appeal the decision to the Review Division (RD) '''within 90  days of the Board decision'''. The RD is a review body internal to the Board; links to RD material, including RD appeal forms, are available on the Board website (through the link “Review and Appeals” on the left list of the home page). The RD must issue a decision within 180 days of the appeal being filed. The RD decision may then be appealed to an independent tribunal, the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal (WCAT) within '''30 days of the RD decision'''. WCAT appeal forms are available on the [http://www.wcat.bc.ca WCAT website]. See [[Appeals in Worker%27s Compensation Claims (7:VI) | Section VI: Appeals]] for more details.
If the worker (or the employer) disagrees with the Board’s decision, he or she may appeal the decision to the Review Division (RD) '''within 90  days of the Board decision'''. The RD is a review body internal to the Board; links to RD material, including RD appeal forms, are available on the Board website (through the link “Review and Appeals” on the left list of the home page). The RD must issue a decision within 180 days of the appeal being filed. The RD decision may then be appealed to an independent tribunal, the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal (WCAT) within '''30 days of the RD decision'''. WCAT appeal forms are available on the [http://www.wcat.bc.ca WCAT website]. See [[Appeals in Worker%27s Compensation Claims (7:VI) | Section VI: Appeals]] for more details.
Section 55 of the WCA requires that generally, a worker must apply for compensation within one year of the date of injury unless there are  “exceptional circumstances” (with some exceptions). If a worker’s application has been denied because of a late application, please consult s. 55 of the WCA and Policy #93 of the RSCM II to assess what evidence of “exceptional circumstances” may be relevant in that case. 
== C. Overview: Worker Disability and Compensation Benefits ==
Of the 100,000 workers injured on the job in B.C. every year, about half suffer minor or inconvenient injuries and return to their pre-injury employment in quick order. Most of these claims are accepted by the Board for health care benefits only (medical treatment, medication, etc.). 
Of those workers whose injuries are more serious, there are several common profiles of disability and recovery. The following examples are to illustrate common compensation benefits and scenarios for disability.
#The worker suffers a broken wrist in his dominant hand and cannot perform his job duties as a result. His doctor recommends a certain number  of weeks to recover after which he is cleared to return to work (RTW) full duties. The worker makes an application for compensation. If his claim is accepted, the Board sets a short-term wage rate (STWR) on his claim (based on his average earnings) and the worker is paid temporary wage loss benefits (TWL) at this rate for his days of lost work. The Board also covers any health care costs such as treatment or medication. If there are no permanent medical consequences to this injury and the worker returns to work full duties, the Board issues a decision that the  injury is “resolved” and his claim is closed. The worker is not referred for any other benefits such as Disability Awards (DAs) or Vocational Rehabilitation (VR).
#The worker suffers a more serious injury to his hand (e.g. a crush injury). If his claim is accepted, he again receives TWL for his time away from work. However, after 10 weeks, the Board issues a new long-term wage rate (LTWR) based on a more complex formula in law and policy. At  some point, the Board considers that the worker’s condition is no longer “temporary” and must make one of the following decisions about the  worker’s medical condition. Either:
#*a. His injury has “'''resolved'''” with no permanent impairment and he can RTW and perform full duties. In this case (as above), the Board will  issue a “resolve” decision ending his TWL benefits and his file will be closed; or
#*b. His injury is not fully resolved and he is left with some permanent functional impairment. In this case, the Board will issue a “plateau decision”, setting a date at which it considers that the worker’s condition is no longer temporary but it has reached a medical “plateau” (that is, the condition will not significantly change in the next year). This “plateau” decision also ends TWL benefits on the plateau date but will  also refer the worker to DAs to assess the nature and severity of this permanent impairment. In a separate decision, the DA will rate his impairment according to a schedule and award the worker “permanent functional impairment” (PFI) pension (impairment % compared to a healthy  person) in a “PFI decision”. The PFI pension is awarded regardless of whether the worker returns to work or not as it is compensation for the physical impairment, not for lost wages. 
The plateau decision also sets out whether the Board thinks that the worker can return to his pre-injury job, performing full duties, with the impairment. If the worker can return to his pre-injury work, the Board does not need to retrain him and there is no referral made to VR.