Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "BC Human Rights Code (6:III)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
no edit summary
Line 97: Line 97:
Also, distinctions based on age are not prohibited insofar as they relate to a ''bona fide'' seniority scheme. Distinctions based on marital  status, physical or mental disability, sex or age will continue to be allowed under bona fide retirement, superannuation, or pension plans,  and under ''bona fide'' insurance plans, including those which are self-funded by employers or provided by third parties: see s 13(3). Mandatory retirement may also not constitute a breach of the Code when it is part of a bona fide pension plan as long as it is not done in order to circumvent the rights of individuals.  
Also, distinctions based on age are not prohibited insofar as they relate to a ''bona fide'' seniority scheme. Distinctions based on marital  status, physical or mental disability, sex or age will continue to be allowed under bona fide retirement, superannuation, or pension plans,  and under ''bona fide'' insurance plans, including those which are self-funded by employers or provided by third parties: see s 13(3). Mandatory retirement may also not constitute a breach of the Code when it is part of a bona fide pension plan as long as it is not done in order to circumvent the rights of individuals.  


7. Discrimination by Unions, Employer Organizations or Occupational A ssociationsSection  14 states that trade unions, employers’   organizations or occupational associations may not deny membership to any person or  discriminate against a person on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, political belief, religion, marital status, family  status, physical or mental disability, sex, sexual orientation, age, or unrelated criminal record. Please refer to De Lima v. The Empire Landmark and Hotel Conference Centre and Major, 2006 BCHRT 440.Protection against denial of membership has been held to apply only against an implicated union, organization, or association and not against  an individual, since “persons” are not covered by s 14. Please refer to Ratsoy v BC Teachers’ Federation and others, 2005 BCHRT 53 at para  23. This differs from other protections granted by the HRC, which, in appropriate circumstances, generally do allow an action to be brought against both an organization (e.g. an employer) and its individual members (e.g. a manager).B.Prohibited Grounds of Discrimination 1.GeneralProhibited  grounds of discrimination include gender, age (for those 19 and over), race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, political belief, religion, marital status, family status, physical or   mental   disability,   sexual   orientation,   criminal   record   (that   is   not   relevant   to   the employment, union or occupational association), and lawful source of income. Note that not all of the areas listed in ss 7 -14 of the HRC are  afforded protection against all forms of discrimination. For example, the HRC does not prohibit landlords from discriminating on the basis of a tenant’ s political beliefs. The grounds of discrimination that apply depend on the section of the HRC in question. One must first decide which  section is involved and then check to see which grounds are associated with that section (see the helpful chart on page 6-3 above) .  To determine whether a violation of the HRC has occurred, consult the relevant section of the HRC and review recent case law. Case law can be  found on the B.C.  Human  Rights Tribunal  website  (www.bchrt.bc.ca\decisions), indexed by year, and searchable based on a variety of criteria.
=== 7. Discrimination by Unions, Employer Organizations or Occupational Associations ===
 
Section 14 states that trade unions, employers’ organizations or occupational associations may not deny membership to any person or  discriminate against a person on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, political belief, religion, marital status, family  status, physical or mental disability, sex, sexual orientation, age, or unrelated criminal record. Please refer to ''De Lima v. The Empire Landmark and Hotel Conference Centre and Major'', 2006 BCHRT 440.
 
Protection against denial of membership has been held to apply only against an implicated union, organization, or association and not against  an individual, since “persons” are not covered by s 14. Please refer to ''Ratsoy v BC Teachers’ Federation and others'', 2005 BCHRT 53 at para  23. This differs from other protections granted by the HRC, which, in appropriate circumstances, generally do allow an action to be brought against both an organization (e.g. an employer) and its individual members (e.g. a manager).
 
== B. Prohibited Grounds of Discrimination ==
 
=== 1. General ===
 
Prohibited grounds of discrimination include gender, age (for those 19 and over), race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, political belief, religion, marital status, family status, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation, criminal record (that is not relevant to the employment, union or occupational association), and lawful source of income. Note that not all of the areas listed in ss 7-14 of the HRC are  afforded protection against all forms of discrimination. For example, the HRC does not prohibit landlords from discriminating on the basis of a tenant’s political beliefs. The grounds of discrimination that apply depend on the section of the HRC in question. One must first decide which  section is involved and then check to see which grounds are associated with that section (see the helpful chart on page 6-3 above) .   
 
To determine whether a violation of the HRC has occurred, consult the relevant section of the HRC and review recent case law. Case law can be  found on the [http://www.bchrt.bc.ca/decisions B.C. Human RightsTribunal website], indexed by year, and searchable based on a variety of criteria.


p6-8
p6-8