Practice Recommendations on Criminal Law for Law Students (1:XIII): Difference between revisions
From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Practice Recommendations on Criminal Law for Law Students (1:XIII) (view source)
Revision as of 17:13, 16 February 2017
, 16 February 2017no edit summary
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== 1. Challenging the | == 1. Challenging the admissibility of evidence == | ||
Prior to the trial commencing one should have reviewed the key evidence in the case and identified potential challenges to the admissibility of that evidence. One should consider if the admissibility issue or ''Charter'' challenge to the evidence can be canvassed with Crown counsel prior to the start of a trial. Generally, unless there is a good strategic reason to not inform Crown counsel, (i.e. informing the Crown will allow it to call additional evidence that the defence knows is available, but not being called) admissibility issues should be brought to the Crown’s attention ahead of time. | Prior to the trial commencing one should have reviewed the key evidence in the case and identified potential challenges to the admissibility of that evidence. One should consider if the admissibility issue or ''Charter'' challenge to the evidence can be canvassed with Crown counsel prior to the start of a trial. Generally, unless there is a good strategic reason to not inform Crown counsel, (i.e. informing the Crown will allow it to call additional evidence that the defence knows is available, but not being called) admissibility issues should be brought to the Crown’s attention ahead of time. | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Challenging the admissibility of evidence is perhaps the most important work that the defence can perform as an advocate for the client as lay litigants are ill-equipped to recognize and challenge inadmissible evidence. Rules of admissibility of evidence tend to be complex issues that require a critical analysis of the law followed by an application of the law to the facts. Diligent preparation would allow student to present challenges to the admissibility of evidence and have inadmissible evidence excluded from the court’s consideration. Some challenges to the admissibility of evidence are simply made through objections and legal arguments at the time Crown seeks to adduce the evidence, while others will require the court to hear additional evidence that is relevant to its admissibility. | Challenging the admissibility of evidence is perhaps the most important work that the defence can perform as an advocate for the client as lay litigants are ill-equipped to recognize and challenge inadmissible evidence. Rules of admissibility of evidence tend to be complex issues that require a critical analysis of the law followed by an application of the law to the facts. Diligent preparation would allow student to present challenges to the admissibility of evidence and have inadmissible evidence excluded from the court’s consideration. Some challenges to the admissibility of evidence are simply made through objections and legal arguments at the time Crown seeks to adduce the evidence, while others will require the court to hear additional evidence that is relevant to its admissibility. | ||
== 2. Setting the | == 2. Setting the trial date == | ||
LSLAP clinicians are encouraged to, but are not required to appear in court to set a trial date. The trial date must be set with the approval of the supervising lawyer and according to LSLAP trial avaiability. | LSLAP clinicians are encouraged to, but are not required to appear in court to set a trial date. The trial date must be set with the approval of the supervising lawyer and according to LSLAP trial avaiability. |