ICBC and Basic Compulsory Autoplan Coverage (12:X): Difference between revisions
From Clicklaw Wikibooks
ICBC and Basic Compulsory Autoplan Coverage (12:X) (view source)
Revision as of 22:41, 12 August 2019
, 12 August 2019→C. Accident (“No Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the IVR*
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
According to [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/1931/1931canlii473/1931canlii473.html?autocompleteStr=mcknight%20v%20general&autocompletePos=1 McKnight v General Casualty Insurance Co. of Paris], 1931 CanLII 473 (BC CA), an insured need not provide information or evidence to an insurance company respecting a breach if the company is contemplating using such a breach to deny coverage to the insured. This is not considered to be refusing to cooperate with the insurer in the defence of the action. However, the insured may still have to provide information regarding the accident itself. | According to [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/1931/1931canlii473/1931canlii473.html?autocompleteStr=mcknight%20v%20general&autocompletePos=1 McKnight v General Casualty Insurance Co. of Paris], 1931 CanLII 473 (BC CA), an insured need not provide information or evidence to an insurance company respecting a breach if the company is contemplating using such a breach to deny coverage to the insured. This is not considered to be refusing to cooperate with the insurer in the defence of the action. However, the insured may still have to provide information regarding the accident itself. | ||
== C. Accident (“No Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the ''IVR'' | == C. Accident (“No Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the ''IVR'' == | ||
=== 1. What are “No Fault” Benefits? === | === 1. What are “No Fault” Benefits? === |