1,399
edits
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= July 18, 2019}} | |||
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = criminal}} | {{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = criminal}} | ||
Line 171: | Line 172: | ||
Consider whether there are other exclusionary rules that could be used to exclude any key pieces of evidence that the Crown needs to prove its case. Generally, if a piece of evidence has more prejudicial effect than probative value, the evidence will be excluded. (''R v. Seaboyer'' [1991] 2 SCR 577) | Consider whether there are other exclusionary rules that could be used to exclude any key pieces of evidence that the Crown needs to prove its case. Generally, if a piece of evidence has more prejudicial effect than probative value, the evidence will be excluded. (''R v. Seaboyer'' [1991] 2 SCR 577) | ||
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters1-7}} | {{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters1-7}} |
edits