Anonymous

Pleading Not Guilty and Criminal Trials (1:VII): Difference between revisions

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Line 154: Line 154:
# That the accused intended to commit the crime (''mens rea'').  
# That the accused intended to commit the crime (''mens rea'').  


If the Crown failed to lead ''any'' evidence on any of the above, the defence/accused should make a no-evidence motion. This asks the judge to direct the acquittal of the accused on the ground that there is absolutely no evidence of some essential element of the offence. [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1976/1976canlii8/1976canlii8.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQAodW5pdGVkIHN0YXRlcyBvZiBhbWVyaWNhIHYgc2hlcGhhcmQgMTk3NgAAAAAB&resultIndex=1 'USA v Shephard'' [1977<nowiki>]</nowiki> 2 SCR 1067]; [https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1998/1998canlii819/1998canlii819.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQANciB2IGNoYXJlbXNraQAAAAAB&resultIndex=1 ''R v Charemski'', [1998<nowiki>]</nowiki> 1 SCR 679]. Arguments by the Crown and defence will be heard. Defence may still call their own evidence if the motion fails.
If the Crown failed to lead ''any'' evidence on any of the above, the defence/accused should make a no-evidence motion. This asks the judge to direct the acquittal of the accused on the ground that there is absolutely no evidence of some essential element of the offence. ([https://canlii.ca/t/1mx51 ''USA v Shephard'' [1977<nowiki>]</nowiki> 2 SCR 1067]; [https://canlii.ca/t/1fqtc ''R v Charemski'', [1998<nowiki>]</nowiki> 1 SCR 679]. Arguments by the Crown and defence will be heard. Defence may still call their own evidence if the motion fails.
 


=== 7. Presentation of Defence Case ===
=== 7. Presentation of Defence Case ===
6,151

edits