Difference between revisions of "Directing Residential Care Concerns to Health Authorities"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 284: Line 284:
There  are a number of  international human rights conventions that can also be relied to support human rights  (non discrimination) based  arguments for people living in residential care, such as equitable access to wheelchairs. These include for example, the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  which Canada signed in 2007 and ratified it in 2010.  It places a responsibility on Canada to address the many barriers faced by persons of any age with a disability. The provincial and territorial governments are responsible for implementing rights in the Convention within their jurisdictions.  From a human rights perspective, for example, a wheelchair is more than an assistive device for many people with disabilities; it is the means by which they can exercise their human rights and achieve inclusion and equal participation.
There  are a number of  international human rights conventions that can also be relied to support human rights  (non discrimination) based  arguments for people living in residential care, such as equitable access to wheelchairs. These include for example, the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  which Canada signed in 2007 and ratified it in 2010.  It places a responsibility on Canada to address the many barriers faced by persons of any age with a disability. The provincial and territorial governments are responsible for implementing rights in the Convention within their jurisdictions.  From a human rights perspective, for example, a wheelchair is more than an assistive device for many people with disabilities; it is the means by which they can exercise their human rights and achieve inclusion and equal participation.


==Ombudsperson Office==
===Ombudsperson Office===


The Ombudsperson is an independent officer of the Legislature appointed under the Ombudsperson Act. The focus of the Office is to ensure that every person in British Columbia is treated fairly in the provision of public services. The Ombudsperson has the responsibility to advise government on systemic causes of unfairness and to recommend changes to practices, policies and legislation that contribute to recurring unfairness.
The Ombudsperson is an independent officer of the Legislature appointed under the Ombudsperson Act. The focus of the Office is to ensure that every person in British Columbia is treated fairly in the provision of public services. The Ombudsperson has the responsibility to advise government on systemic causes of unfairness and to recommend changes to practices, policies and legislation that contribute to recurring unfairness.


===Role, mandate, function===
====Role, mandate, function====


The general function of the Ombudsperson is to oversee the administrative actions of government authorities. The Ombudsperson determines whether provincial ministries and  public agencies have acted fairly and reasonably, and whether their actions and decisions are consistent with relevant legislation, policies and procedures. The Ombudsperson can
The general function of the Ombudsperson is to oversee the administrative actions of government authorities. The Ombudsperson determines whether provincial ministries and  public agencies have acted fairly and reasonably, and whether their actions and decisions are consistent with relevant legislation, policies and procedures. The Ombudsperson can
Line 301: Line 301:
The Ombudsperson has authority over a wide range of government departments and Ministries; perhaps  one of  the most relevant ones here is the Ministry of Health.  From 2008 to 2009 the Ombudsperson carried out an extensive review of care for seniors in British Columbia, identifying a wide variety of situations where seniors and families were not being treated in a fair manner in home support and residential care services. In 2012 the Ombudsperson also reviewed the circumstances under which certificates of incapability were being issued in British Columbia to declare persons (typically  seniors) incapable of managing their financial affairs. The Ombudsperson’s review focused on whether the incapability certificate process was fair, and whether there were sufficient procedural safeguards to protect the person’s rights.
The Ombudsperson has authority over a wide range of government departments and Ministries; perhaps  one of  the most relevant ones here is the Ministry of Health.  From 2008 to 2009 the Ombudsperson carried out an extensive review of care for seniors in British Columbia, identifying a wide variety of situations where seniors and families were not being treated in a fair manner in home support and residential care services. In 2012 the Ombudsperson also reviewed the circumstances under which certificates of incapability were being issued in British Columbia to declare persons (typically  seniors) incapable of managing their financial affairs. The Ombudsperson’s review focused on whether the incapability certificate process was fair, and whether there were sufficient procedural safeguards to protect the person’s rights.


===Issues===
====Issues====


A wide variety of residential care issues potentially come under the scope of the  Ombudsperson’s mandate of assuring administrative  fairness. These may include, for example, examining whether or not
A wide variety of residential care issues potentially come under the scope of the  Ombudsperson’s mandate of assuring administrative  fairness. These may include, for example, examining whether or not
Line 312: Line 312:
* a public body  has failed to act – e.g.  a health authority  “turns a blind eye”  to care facility operators  charging  residents extra  for services that  are  included in the accommodation fees paid.
* a public body  has failed to act – e.g.  a health authority  “turns a blind eye”  to care facility operators  charging  residents extra  for services that  are  included in the accommodation fees paid.


===Process===
====Process====


Complaints to Ombudsperson may be made by a person or group of persons.  A complaint must be in writing.  The Ombudsperson is a resource of last resort; that is, the person must have gone through the other avenues first.  
Complaints to Ombudsperson may be made by a person or group of persons.  A complaint must be in writing.  The Ombudsperson is a resource of last resort; that is, the person must have gone through the other avenues first.  


===Available remedies===
====Available remedies====


The Ombudsperson can make recommendations which may or may not be acted upon by the public  body. These recommendations are typically couched in language of “administrative fairness” and “natural justice” not whether the actions are  legal. The Ombudsperson’s work is guided by the democratic principles of openness, transparency and accountability.
The Ombudsperson can make recommendations which may or may not be acted upon by the public  body. These recommendations are typically couched in language of “administrative fairness” and “natural justice” not whether the actions are  legal. The Ombudsperson’s work is guided by the democratic principles of openness, transparency and accountability.


==The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT)==
===The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT)===


The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT) has numerous roles. In the context of residential care, the PGT’s responsibilities can include investigating
The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT) has numerous roles. In the context of residential care, the PGT’s responsibilities can include investigating
Line 332: Line 332:
The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT) has jurisdiction over health care decisions, when no one is available or qualified from the list of substitute decision makers. The PGT office can authorize another person such as a friend of the adult to make substitute decisions.  If there is no person to authorize, the PGT can take the role as Temporary Substitute Decisionmaker.
The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT) has jurisdiction over health care decisions, when no one is available or qualified from the list of substitute decision makers. The PGT office can authorize another person such as a friend of the adult to make substitute decisions.  If there is no person to authorize, the PGT can take the role as Temporary Substitute Decisionmaker.
    
    
The PGT also has jurisdiction when there is a dispute between potential substitute decisionmakers of equal rank about who is to be chosen to make decisions on the person’s  behalf and the  issue cannot be resolved by the health care provider.   In those circumstances, the health care provider is required to contact a Health Care Decisions Consultant at the Public Guardian and Trustee.
The PGT also has jurisdiction when there is a dispute between potential substitute decisionmakers of equal rank about who is to be chosen to make decisions on the person’s  behalf and the  issue cannot be resolved by the health care provider. In those circumstances, the health care provider is required to contact a Health Care Decisions Consultant at the Public Guardian and Trustee.
    
    
The PGT also has the authority to act as Committee  of the Estate when a person is declared mentally incapable under the Patient Property Act. This area of law on the role of the PGT and  “incapability  certificates” is undergoing major change at present, and a new  approach is expected to be in place by the end of 2014.
The PGT also has the authority to act as Committee  of the Estate when a person is declared mentally incapable under the Patient Property Act. This area of law on the role of the PGT and  “incapability  certificates” is undergoing major change at present, and a new  approach is expected to be in place by the end of 2014.
 
==Directing Concerns to Review Boards==
 
===Mental Health Review Board===
 
As noted in Chapter 3 (Legal Issues in Admission & Transfer), older adults are sometimes admitted to a hospital where they become involuntarily detained under the Mental Health Act  and then involuntarily transferred to a residential care facility on  “extended leave. “ They can also be transferred from a care facility to a hospital and become involuntarily detained under the Mental Health Act.  In both cases, they lose basic rights and can be treated without consent.
 
There is a formal process for medically certifying adults under the Mental Health Act.  However, the adult does not have to be personally examined by a psychiatrist or even a physician in order to be involuntarily detained under the Mental Health Act.  The physician may operate on collateral information when “medically certifying “the person. This can sometimes lead to unnecessary loss of liberty.  However, the Mental Health Review Board can review the continued involuntary detention of people “medically certified” under the  Mental Health Act.
 
====Purpose====
 
The Mental Health Review Board is an independent tribunal established to conduct review panel hearings under the Mental Health Act. The review panel makes a decision on only one issue - whether the person continues to meet the criteria to remain as an involuntary patient under the Mental Health Act. It does not make decisions about treatment. However, if the person is no longer involuntarily detained, the treatment issues usually become moot.
The Board's mandate is based on involuntary patients' periodic rights to fair and timely reviews of their loss of liberty. Its function is to ensure that people admitted by physicians and detained involuntarily in the designated facilities have access to an objective review process.
The system is subject to the constitutional rights of section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,  which states that "[e]veryone has a right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
 
====Composition====
 
 
The Mental Health Review Board is comprised of a chair and members appointed by the Minister of Health to conduct “review panel” hearings. A review panel must consist of a medical practitioner, a member in good standing of the Law Society of British Columbia or a person with equivalent training, and a third member who is neither a medical practitioner nor a lawyer.
Currently, the Board has 83 legal, medical and community members living in various locations throughout the province. A review panel is comprised of three or more members of the Board. After a hearing, the review panel decides whether a patient should be discharged from involuntary status. In the Lower Mainland, Community Legal Assistance Services delivers the Mental Health Law Program, which may be able to provide representation at a review panel hearing. Its resources are very limited.
 
====Process====
 
A person is eligible to apply for a review within strict statutory time limits following the issuance of the second medical certificate. Board members must conduct hearings within either 14 or 28 days from the day the application is received unless the person waives this right.
 
Mental Health Review Board controls its own processes and makes rules respecting practice and procedure. It has considerable latitude in terms of who can attend, who can stay in the hearing, whether the patient can have a support person present throughout the hearing, and the allowable evidence.
If the Mental Health Review Board confirms the continuing need for the person’s involuntary detention, this can be reviewed, but subject to the time frames in  the Mental Health Act.
 
====Remedies====
 
 




1,185

edits

Navigation menu