Pleading Not Guilty and Criminal Trials (1:VII): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pleading Not Guilty and Criminal Trials (1:VII) (view source)
Revision as of 06:31, 6 December 2015
, 6 December 2015no edit summary
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
*A confession is a statement made to a police officer (or person in authority), and there are very strict rules regarding the admission of such statements at trial. | *A confession is a statement made to a police officer (or person in authority), and there are very strict rules regarding the admission of such statements at trial. | ||
Anything the accused says to the police before or after the arrest is admissible as a confession ''only'' if the Crown first proves it was made voluntarily. See the Section X: Charter below for more information on confessions. | Anything the accused says to the police before or after the arrest is admissible as a confession ''only'' if the Crown first proves it was made voluntarily. See the [[Criminal Law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1:X) | Section X: Charter]] below for more information on confessions. | ||
e)Hearsay | ==== e) Hearsay evidence ==== | ||
Hearsay is generally defined as an out of court statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Hearsay is inadmissible unless the statement falls into one of the hearsay exceptions. The key factor in determining if a statement is inadmissible hearsay is its purpose.. The defining features of the Hearsay rule are: (a) the purpose of adducing the statement is to prove the truth of its contents and (b) the absence of contemporaneous opportunity to cross-examine the declarant. For example, if the witness on the stand states "the passenger said the light was red," this is hearsay if: (a) the truth of the matter is to determine whether the light was red, and (b) the passenger who made this statement is not in-court and cannot be cross-examined. | |||
There are some traditional exceptions to the hearsay rule, through which such statements can be admissible. These include: | |||
#confessions, | |||
#dying declarations, | |||
#declarations against the interest of the declarant, | |||
#records made in the course of duty if the declarant is deceased or otherwise unavailable (for example, doctor's notes), | |||
#declarations of a state of mind or bodily condition as evidence of the state reported, but not of its cause (for example, using the declaration "I'm cold" to establish that the person making the statement was cold, but not using it for the assumption that the weather outside was cold that day), | |||
#statements of intention (used to increase the probability that the person who made the statement actually performed that intended action), and | |||
#spontaneous declarations (''Res Gestae'' - statements made so closely to the event that they are connected to it). | |||
Each exception has its own requirements that must be met. However, there are two basic tests underlying all of them: necessity, and the circumstantial probability of trustworthiness. In addition to the traditional common law exceptions, the Courts have developed the "principled approach" to determining the admissibility of hearsay. See ''R v Starr'', [2000] 2 SCR 144. This approach, too, looks at necessity and reliability. These two requirements must be met before allowing hearsay evidence to be admitted: |