Difference between revisions of "Introduction to Youth Justice (2:I)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
By the 1960s, the ''JDA'' was undergoing public criticism, particularly for its highly discretionary regime, which gave judges, police, and correctional officials broad powers to deal with youths according to their own perceptions of a child’s “best interests”. Thus, Parliament enacted the ''Young Offenders Act'', RSC 1985, c Y-1 [“''YOA''”], which governed juvenile criminal law from 1984 to 2003. The Act applied to youths charged with specific offences under the ''Criminal Code'', RSC 1984, c C-46 [“''CC''”] and other federal  law.  While  the ''YOA''  considered  the  individual  circumstances  of  young  persons,  it  also purported to better protect society against violent youths. The Act also gave more recognition of juvenile  legal  rights,  established  a  uniform  national  age  jurisdiction,  safeguarded  against  the infringement of the basic rights guaranteed under the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms'' (Part I of the ''Constitution Act'', 1982, being Schedule B to the ''Canada Act'' 1982 (U.K.), 1982 c. 11 [“''Charter''”]), and increased protection for young persons by creating the requirement of parental notification upon arrest, rights to legal representation, and the availability of the insanity defence to youth charged with offences.
By the 1960s, the ''JDA'' was undergoing public criticism, particularly for its highly discretionary regime, which gave judges, police, and correctional officials broad powers to deal with youths according to their own perceptions of a child’s “best interests”. Thus, Parliament enacted the ''Young Offenders Act'', RSC 1985, c Y-1 [“''YOA''”], which governed juvenile criminal law from 1984 to 2003. The Act applied to youths charged with specific offences under the ''Criminal Code'', RSC 1984, c C-46 [“''CC''”] and other federal  law.  While  the ''YOA''  considered  the  individual  circumstances  of  young  persons,  it  also purported to better protect society against violent youths. The Act also gave more recognition of juvenile  legal  rights,  established  a  uniform  national  age  jurisdiction,  safeguarded  against  the infringement of the basic rights guaranteed under the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms'' (Part I of the ''Constitution Act'', 1982, being Schedule B to the ''Canada Act'' 1982 (U.K.), 1982 c. 11 [“''Charter''”]), and increased protection for young persons by creating the requirement of parental notification upon arrest, rights to legal representation, and the availability of the insanity defence to youth charged with offences.


As of April 1, 2003, the ''Youth Criminal Justice Act'', SC 2002, c 1 [“''YCJA''”] came into effect and replaced the previous ''YOA''. The ''YCJA'' recognizes that youths have rights under the ''Charter'', the ''Canadian Bill of Rights'' S.C. 1960, c 44, and the United Nations ''Convention on the Rights of the Child'' [“''UNCRC''”], which Canada signed and ratified in the early 1990s. The ''YCJA'' preserves many of the elements of the ''YOA''; however, it focuses on three key objectives to better protect the public: (1) preventing youth crime by addressing underlying causes; (2) meaningful consequences  for  offences;  and  (3)  increased  focus  on  rehabilitation  and  reintegration  for  youth returning to the community (''YCJA'', s 3). The ''YCJA'' also encourages judges to impose non-custodial sentences  on young  persons  who are found guilty  under  the  Act where  it is consistent  under  the general  principles. This  does  not  mean  that  it  seeks  to  prohibit custodial  sentences,  but  rather  to ensure that such measures are the last option.
As of April 1, 2003, the ''Youth Criminal Justice Act'', SC 2002, c 1 [“''YCJA''”] came into effect and replaced the previous ''YOA''. The ''YCJA'' recognizes that youths have rights under the ''Charter'', the ''Canadian Bill of Rights'' S.C. 1960, c 44, and the United Nations ''Convention on the Rights of the Child'' [“''UNCRC''”], which Canada signed and ratified in the early 1990s.
 
The ''YCJA'' preserves many of the elements of the ''YOA''; however, it focuses on three key objectives to better protect the public: (1) preventing youth crime by addressing underlying causes; (2) meaningful consequences  for  offences;  and  (3)  increased  focus  on  rehabilitation  and  reintegration  for  youth returning to the community (''YCJA'', s 3). The ''YCJA'' also encourages judges to impose non-custodial sentences  on young  persons  who are found guilty  under  the  Act where  it is consistent  under  the general  principles. This  does  not  mean  that  it  seeks  to  prohibit custodial  sentences,  but  rather  to ensure that such measures are the last option.
 
A significant change is the inclusion of the victims’ role in the process. While victims have no rights per se as they are not a party to criminal proceedings, the ''YCJA'' holds that victims will be heard and treated with courtesy, compassion, and respect for their privacy, and be minimally inconvenienced. Also, consequences will include educating the offender about the impact of the crime, and focusing on repairing the damage or paying back society in a constructive fashion. Parliament recognizes that victims are involved in the process, though not as legal parties to the proceedings. In some respects, B.C. legislation dealing with victims of crime has already incorporated a number of these principles, particularly in the ''Victims of Crime Act'', RSBC 1996, c 478. In 2015, Parliament enacted the ''Canadian Victims Bill of Rights'', SC 2015, c 13, s 2 (“''CVBR''”). The Act guarantees victims of crime various rights, including the right to information about the criminal justice system, their rights as victims of crime, and  their  right  to  have  their  security and  privacy considered  by  the  appropriate  authorities  in  the criminal justice system. For more information on victims’ rights, and resources for victims of crime see '''Chapter 4: Victims'''.
 
The ''YCJA'' was amended by Bill C-10 (“''The Safe Streets and Communities Act''”) in 2012. The changes to the ''YCJA'' in Bill C-10 came into force on October 23, 2012.
 
One change to the YCJA in Bill C-10 is that individual deterrence and denunciation of unlawful conduct was added as a sentencing principle. It  also sets out that youths are presumed to have diminished moral culpability or blameworthiness in comparison to adult offenders. Furthermore, Bill C-10 states that the youth justice system is intended to protect the public by holding young persons convicted of offences accountable through using proportionate measures, promoting rehabilitation and reintegration, and preventing crime by directing youths to programs that  address underlying causes of their actions. Bill C-10 also sets out definitions for a “serious offence” and a “violent offence” which are  broader than previous definitions given in the case law. B.C. has enacted complementary legislation for offences against provincial statutes  or municipal bylaws. The ''Youth Justice Act'', SBC 2003, c 85 came into force on April 1, 2004, replacing the ''Young Offenders (British Columbia) Act'', RSBC 1996, c 494.

Navigation menu