Difference between revisions of "Creditors' Remedies against Debtors (10:III)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 111: Line 111:


After default, a secured party may make a proposal to the debtor and other interested parties to take the collateral to satisfy obligations secured by it (s 61).
After default, a secured party may make a proposal to the debtor and other interested parties to take the collateral to satisfy obligations secured by it (s 61).
'''The debtor and other interested parties have 15 days to object to the secured party’s proposal. Failure to object is deemed to be an irrevocable election to forfeit all rights and interests in the good and entitles the secured party to retain the good.'''
If the debtor or other secured party provides notice of objection to the secured party within 15 days after the notice is given, the secured  party must dispose of the collateral in accordance with the provisions of s 59. In such circumstances, the secured party may make an application to the court for an order that an objection to the secured party’s proposal is ineffective because:
*i) the objection was made for a purpose other than protecting an interest in the collateral or the proceeds of the disposition of the collateral; or
*ii) the market value of the collateral is less than the total amount owing to the secured party plus the costs of disposition.
=== 11. Restrictions on Realization ===
==== a) Subordination of Unperfected Security Interests ====
Under s 20(a), an unperfected security interest is subordinate to the interest of:
*a person who causes the collateral to be seized under legal process to enforce a judgment (including execution, garnishment or attachment), or who has obtained a charging order or equitable execution affecting or relating to the collateral;
*a representative of a creditor enforcing the rights of a person referred to above; and 
*a sheriff acting under the Creditor Assistance Act and any judgment creditor entitled to participate in the distribution of property under the ''Creditor Assistance Act''.
Also, if an interest is unperfected at the date of the bankruptcy or winding-up, then that interest is not effective against a trustee in bankruptcy or a liquidator (''Winding-up and Restructuring Act'', RSC 1985, c 6).
In addition, ss 20(c), 30(3) and 31 confirm the subordination of the interest of a secured party to a bona fide purchaser for value under various circumstances.
==== b) Restriction on the Right to Accelerate a Term Debt ====
The security agreement may contain an “acceleration clause” that provides that the total amount owing becomes due upon default in payments or  whenever the secured party has “commercially reasonable grounds” to believe that they may not be repaid or that the collateral is “in jeopardy”. If there is an acceleration clause in the security agreement, it may not be invoked unless this objective test of “commercially  reasonable grounds” has been satisfied. A secured creditor has commercially reasonable grounds when they have a reasonable belief that there is a risk of non-payment. This could occur for a variety of reasons including the debtor fleeing the country, being hospitalized or illegal  activity taking place on the premises. If the risk is not obvious the creditor must make commercially reasonable efforts to verify their suspicions. Commercially reasonable efforts do not mean best efforts.
==== c) Limitation of the Right of Seizure for Consumer Goods ====
For collateral that is a “consumer good”, where the debtor has paid at least two-thirds of the total amount secured, the creditor may not  seize the good without first obtaining a court order (see [[{{PAGENAME}}#a) Secured Party's Remedies | Section II.A.12.a: Secured Party's Remedies]]).
==== d) Obligation While in Possession of Collateral ====
Section 17 of the PPSA imposes a standard of reasonable care on any secured party in possession of the collateral. e)Rights of a Debtor The  PPSA  preserves  the  debtor’ s  (but  not  the  secured  party’ s)  rights  and  remedies under  other  statutes  that  are  not  inconsistent  with  the  PPSA  as  well  as  the  specific rights and remedies provided in the security agreement, ss 17 and 56(2)(b). f)Rights of Redemption and Reinstatement Under  s  62,  a  debtor  has  redemption  rights.  Any  person entitled  to  notice  of  a pending  disposition  of  collateral  may “redeem”  the  collateral  by  tendering  to  the secured  party  fulfilment  of  the  obligations  secured  by the  collateral  plus  the reasonable  expenses  incurred  by  the  secured  party  associated  in  seizing  the collateral or otherwise preparing it for disposition. The aforementioned obligations may  simply  be  the  amount  in  arrears;  however,  it  is  more  often  the  case  that  an acceleration clause applies, and that the obligations will be the total amount of the debt. Where the security agreement contains an acceleration clause, the debtor may apply  to  court for  relief from  the  consequences  of  default  or  for  an  order  staying enforcement of the security agreement’ s acceleration provision.  Where the collateral is a “consumer good”, the calculation of the obligation secured and the obligation that must be tendered is varied. The debtor may “reinstate” the security  agreement  by  paying  only  the  monies  actually  in  arrears –  negating  the operation of any acceleration clause. The debtor may waive this right but any such agreement  must  be  in  writing  after  default.  Note  that  the  number  of  times  the debtor  may  reinstate  the  security  agreement is  limited  depending  on  the  period  of time  for  repayment  set  out  in  the  security  agreement;  however,  the  frequency  of reinstatement may be varied by agreement between the parties.  1 2.Consumer Goods a)Secured Party’s Remedies Section 67(1) lists the options available to a secured party. The secured party may elect to pursue one of the following remedies:seize or repossess the goods (s 58);  enact the voluntary foreclosure remedy (s 61) (discussedabove); accept the surrender of the goods by the debtor; or start an action to recover a judgment against the debtor for the amount of  the  unpaid  debt  or  unperformed  obligations  under  the  security agreement. This is sometimes called the “seize or sue” rule. If  the  debtor  has  paid  at  least  two-thirds  of  the  total amount  of  the  secured obligation,  the  secured  party  may  not  seize  the consumer good  used  as collateral  (s 58(3)).  However,  the  secured  party  may  apply  to  court  for  an  order  that  the “two-thirds  rule”  should  not  apply  and  the court  will  make  a decision  based  on  (s 58(4), (5)):  the value of the collateral; the amount of the obligation that has been discharged;

Navigation menu