Difference between revisions of "Contracts for Sale of Goods (11:III)"

Contracts for Sale of Goods (11:III) (view source)

12 bytes added , 05:49, 15 June 2016

m

5,483

edits

Revision as of 05:48, 15 June 2016 (view source) Desy Wahyuni (talk \| contribs) (→‎d) Implied Condition of Fitness for Buyer’s Purpose: s 18(a)) ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:49, 15 June 2016 (view source) Desy Wahyuni (talk \| contribs) m (→‎(1) The Concept of Merchantable Quality) Newer edit →
Line 104:		Line 104:

	The concept of merchantable quality is difficult to define. A commonly used test, the '''price abatement''' test, asks whether a reasonable buyer, informed of the actual quality of the goods, would buy the goods without a substantial abatement of price (''B.S. Brown & Son v Craiks Ltd.'', [1970] 1 All ER 823 (HL)). If the informed reasonable buyer would not buy without a substantial abatement of price, unmerchantable quality is inferred, and repudiation may be available.		The concept of merchantable quality is difficult to define. A commonly used test, the '''price abatement''' test, asks whether a reasonable buyer, informed of the actual quality of the goods, would buy the goods without a substantial abatement of price (''B.S. Brown & Son v Craiks Ltd.'', [1970] 1 All ER 823 (HL)). If the informed reasonable buyer would not buy without a substantial abatement of price, unmerchantable quality is inferred, and repudiation may be available.

			next 11-12