Difference between revisions of "ICBC and Personal Injury Claims (12:XII)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 165: Line 165:
'''NOTE:''' The court is not prevented from awarding damages in excess of $100,000.  
'''NOTE:''' The court is not prevented from awarding damages in excess of $100,000.  


If this rule applies to an action, 1.any party may file a notice of fast track action in Form 61; 2.the filing party must serve all other parties on record with a copy; and3.the words “Subject to Rule 15-1” must be added to the style of proceeding, immediately below the listed parties, for all documents filed after the notice of fast track action is filed or if the court so orders. This rule ceases to apply if the court, on its own motion or on application of any party, so orders. Parties to a fast track action can serve on another party a notice of application or  an  affidavit  in  support  of  an  application  ONLY  after  a  case  planning conference  or  a  trial  management  conference  has  been  conducted  in  relation to the action. This rule does not apply if: a.The court orders the fast track action to cease; b.If an application is made by a party, judge, or master to relieve a party from this requirement if            i.It  is  impracticable  or  unfair  to  require  the  party  to comply; orii.The fast track litigation application is urgent;
If this rule applies to an action,  
#any party may file a notice of fast track action in Form 61;  
#the filing party must serve all other parties on record with a copy; '''and'''
#the words “Subject to Rule 15-1” must be added to the style of proceeding, immediately below the listed parties, for all documents filed after the notice of fast track action is filed or if the court so orders.  


*This rule ceases to apply if the court, on its own motion or on application of any party, so orders.
*Parties to a fast track action can serve on another party a notice of application or an affidavit in support of an application ONLY after a  case planning conference or a trial management conference has been conducted in relation to the action. This rule does not apply if:
**a. The court orders the fast track action to cease;
**b. If an application is made by a party, judge, or master to relieve a party from this requirement if           
***i. It is impracticable or unfair to require the party to comply; '''or'''
***ii. The fast track litigation application is urgent;
c.If the action is scandalous, frivolous, or vexatious (as per Rule 9-5); d.If  the  action  will  proceed  by  summary  judgment  or  summary trial (Rule 9-6 and 9-7); e.If an application is made to add, remove, or substitute a party; orf.The parties consent. Fast track action must be heard by the court without a jury. Examinations  for  discovery  of  a  party  of  record  by  all  parties  of  record  who are adverse in interest must not, in total, exceed 2 hours or any greater period to  which  the  person  to  be  examined  consents, unless  otherwise  ordered  by  a court All examinations for discovery in a fast track action must be completed at least 14  days  before  the  scheduled  trial  date,  unless  the  court  orders  otherwise  or the parties to the examination consent. If a party to a fast track action applies for a trial date within 4 moths after the date  on  which  this  rules  becomes  applicable  to  that  action,  the  registrar  must set a date for the trial that is not later than 4 months after the application for a trial date. H.Damages Claimants  often  have  unrealistic  expectations  about  the  amount  of  damages  they  are  likely  to  receive. Claimants should be cautious about listening to stories of awards told by relatives and friends as these stories may be exaggerated and/or may be missing crucial pieces of information. 1.How Damages are A ssessed The court will determine what damages a claimant is entitled to on the basis of precedent. It is therefore  possible  to  project  what  the  court  will  award  by  looking  for  similar  cases.  The judgments  will  outline  the  nature  of  the  injuries  sustained  by  the  claimant  and  court’ s assessment of damages. 2.Heads of Damage To understand  an  award,  it  is  necessary  to consider  all the  heads  of  damage. For  example,  a claimant  who  is  a  brain  surgeon  at  the  height  of  his  or  her  career  and  who  has  a  finger amputated might have a loss of prospective earnings claim in the millions and a relatively small claim for non-pecuniary losses. In contrast, a claimant who is retired and has a leg amputated may have a relatively low loss of prospective earnings claim but a relatively high claim for non-pecuniary damages. The major heads of damage are as follows: a)Non-pecuniary Damages
12-28
12-28

Navigation menu