Difference between revisions of "Small Claims Settlement Conferences (20:XI)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 33: Line 33:
== D. Disclosure ==
== D. Disclosure ==


Trial by ambush is not permitted. Each party is entitled to know the evidence for and against its position. If the parties cannot reach a settlement, the focus will turn to trial preparation. The judge at a settlement conference has the power to order production of documents and  evidence. Each party should attend the settlement conference with a list of documents and evidence that is believed to be in the possession of the other party.  
Trial by ambush is not permitted. Each party is entitled to know the evidence for and against its position. If the parties cannot reach a settlement, the focus will turn to trial preparation. The judge at a settlement conference has the power to order production of documents and  evidence. Each party should attend the settlement conference with a list of documents and evidence that is believed to be in the possession of the other party.  


A judge will order the parties to exchange copies of all documents or allow for their inspection before trial. Disclosure must be timely236. These documents should be compiled in a tabbed binder for easy reference at trial.  
A judge will order the parties to exchange copies of all documents or allow for their inspection before trial. Disclosure must be timely. (See ''Golden Capital Securities Ltd. v Holmes'', 2002 BCSC 516 (CanLII)). These documents should be compiled in a tabbed binder for easy reference at trial.  


Each party must be prepared to disclose the  name of each witness that party intends to call, indicate what evidence each witness will give, and provide a time estimate. If expert evidence will be used, it is helpful if a written report (or at least a draft copy) is available for  the settlement conference. If an expert report is not available, parties will be ordered to exchange those reports prior to trial. There is a minimum  deadline of 30 days before trial237  however the judge at the settlement conference can be asked to change the time limits.  
Each party must be prepared to disclose the  name of each witness that party intends to call, indicate what evidence each witness will give, and provide a time estimate. If expert evidence will be used, it is helpful if a written report (or at least a draft copy) is available for  the settlement conference. If an expert report is not available, parties will be ordered to exchange those reports prior to trial. There is a minimum  deadline of 30 days before trial (Rules 10(3) and (4)) however the judge at the settlement conference can be asked to change the time limits.  


If a party does not comply with a disclosure order, a judge may adjourn the trial, the settlement conference, or both, order that party to pay expenses, order the trial to proceed without allowing that evidence to be used, or dismiss the action.  
If a party does not comply with a disclosure order, a judge may adjourn the trial, the settlement conference, or both, order that party to pay expenses, order the trial to proceed without allowing that evidence to be used, or dismiss the action.  


'''NOTE:''' For case law relating to the disclosure of medical documents and ethical obligations of physicians to their patients see ''Halliday v McCulloch'', 1986 CanLII 1004 (BC CA), ''Hope v Brown'', [1990] BCJ No. 2586, ''Davies v Milne'', 1999 CanLII 6654 (BC SC), and ''Cunningham v Slubowski'',2003 BCSC 1854 (CanLII).  
'''NOTE:''' For case law relating to the disclosure of medical documents and ethical obligations of physicians to their patients see ''Halliday v McCulloch'', 1986 CanLII 1004 (BC CA), ''Hope v Brown'', [1990] BCJ No. 2586, ''Davies v Milne'', 1999 CanLII 6654 (BC SC), and ''Cunningham v Slubowski'',2003 BCSC 1854 (CanLII).  


'''NOTE:''' For case law on obtaining disclosure from the Crown (e.g., from a related criminal case) in a civil case see ''Huang (litigation  guardian of) v Sadler'', [2006] BCJ No. 758 and ''Wong v Antunes'', [2008] BCSC 1739 (CanLII). For case law pertaining to the  admissibility  of evidence obtained through electronic surveillance (e.g., recording telephone conversations and videotaping) and whether it will be considered a violation of the ''Privacy Act'', RSBC 1996, c 373 see ''Watts v Klaemt'', 2007 BCSC 662 (CanLII) and ''Cam v Hood'', 2006 BCSC  842 (CanLII). For case law on obtaining evidence from third parties see ''Lewis v Frye'', 2007 BCSC 89 (CanLII).  
'''NOTE:''' For case law on obtaining disclosure from the Crown (e.g., from a related criminal case) in a civil case see ''Huang (litigation  guardian of) v Sadler'', [2006] BCJ No. 758 and ''Wong v Antunes'', [2008] BCSC 1739 (CanLII). For case law pertaining to the  admissibility  of evidence obtained through electronic surveillance (e.g., recording telephone conversations and videotaping) and whether it will be considered a violation of the ''Privacy Act'', RSBC 1996, c 373 see ''Watts v Klaemt'', 2007 BCSC 662 (CanLII) and ''Cam v Hood'', 2006 BCSC  842 (CanLII). For case law on obtaining evidence from third parties see ''Lewis v Frye'', 2007 BCSC 89 (CanLII).  


A judge may also order the exchange of all case law prior to the trial date.  
A judge may also order the exchange of all case law prior to the trial date.  


Parties should consider writing to the other side after the settlement conference to confirm the deadline, the documents required, and remedies that will be pursued if there is no disclosure. When sending documents, it is important to include a list or outline of what material is enclosed.
Parties should consider writing to the other side after the settlement conference to confirm the deadline, the documents required, and remedies that will be pursued if there is no disclosure. When sending documents, it is important to include a list or outline of what material is enclosed.


== E. Enforcing a Settlement Agreement238 ==
== E. Enforcing a Settlement Agreement238 ==


If an agreement reached at a settlement conference includes payment, and if a party does not comply, the  agreement  can  be  cancelled.  After  filing  an  affidavit describing  the  non-compliance,  the  person entitled  to  payment  may  file  a  payment  order  for  either  the  amount  agreed  to  by  the  parties  as  the default amount and noted on the record as the default amount endorsed by the judge at the settlement conference  or  the full  amount  of  the  original claim  if  there  was  no  default  amount  endorsed  by  the judge.
If an agreement reached at a settlement conference includes payment, and if a party does not comply, the  agreement  can  be  cancelled.  After  filing  an  affidavit describing  the  non-compliance,  the  person entitled  to  payment  may  file  a  payment  order  for  either  the  amount  agreed  to  by  the  parties  as  the default amount and noted on the record as the default amount endorsed by the judge at the settlement conference  or  the full  amount  of  the  original claim  if  there  was  no  default  amount  endorsed  by  the judge.

Navigation menu