Difference between revisions of "Employment Insurance Benefit Entitlement (8:VII)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 142: Line 142:
In the case of ''Attorney General of Canada v Mattieu Lamonde'', 2006 FCA44, the court held that the claimant should be disqualified from benefits because he took a year’s leave from his full time job to attend school in another community, although he immediately found part time work when he arrived there.  
In the case of ''Attorney General of Canada v Mattieu Lamonde'', 2006 FCA44, the court held that the claimant should be disqualified from benefits because he took a year’s leave from his full time job to attend school in another community, although he immediately found part time work when he arrived there.  


Refer also to ''Attorney General of Canada v Melanie Gauthier'', 2006 FCA40 and ''Canada v Cloutier'', 2007 FCA 161 and CUB 66126.
'''NOTE:''' While  nothing in the legislation indicates that improving one’s qualifications can never be just cause, the Court of Appeal continues to set aside decisions on this basis.
 
'''NOTE:''' While  nothing in the legislation indicates that improving one’s qualifications can never be just cause, the Court of Appeal continues to set aside decisions on this basis.  


=== 2. Misconduct ===
=== 2. Misconduct ===
5,109

edits

Navigation menu